Active Users:1460 Time:14/09/2025 04:50:10 AM
No... Etzel Send a noteboard - 28/05/2010 03:04:41 PM
The question was always only, who directly killed Asmo by his hands in that scene. IMO, Slayer did this. It's not erroneous to assume then, that he was hired by a Forsaken to do that.

Indeed, except that you use the evidence of Graendal as some of the concrete evidence for your theory.


It isn't that important for my theory, because this rather deals with the question who hired Slayer, if he was the direct killer of Asmo. Not directly with the identity of the one who actually did it, though one could call it an indirect clue in LoC, as RJ does.

So Slayer would attack Asmodean head on? Despite the fact that I've shown you that he'd only attack Rand in his sleep in a neutralizing city, you still believe he'd attack one of the original thirteen directly? Pfft...


Yes, I think so. Surprise, opportunity & timing are the keys to manage it.

He ambushed Rand while he was sleeping in a city where Rand couldn't channel! That's like saying that a man can kill a lion if the lion has no legs, and teeth and is drugged. Therefore he must have killed that able-bodied lying dead over there.


Slayer offered, though, to try killing Rand again, though it was very possible that Rand isn't in Far Madding anymore.

Except that even if Asmodean was that moronic, Slayer would not be. He's mentioned that he only bows to the Forsaken, implying that they are the greatest threats he knows, and yet we are to believe he attacks one of them head on with poisoned daggers using surprise. That's like betting on the lottery. Worst of all, to think that any of the thirteen would go pale is utter nonsense. Moridin mentions Slayer to them in WH and it hardly stirs a breeze. 'Oooh, the lethal killer is after Fain'... not really. They're much more concerned about other things.


Asmo lost his Chosen status at the end of TSR. And if a real Chosen orders Slayer to kill the betrayer, he naturally would. Besides, the Forsaken are naturally arrogant, they usually don't even have much respect for each other.

Which you can't base on anything, except a single paragraph that heavily insinuates that it was a crime of opportunity.


If it was as simply as you and the others think, RJ wouldn't need to write an extensive note about the murder with all details and what lead to it, and certainly more people had sent/told RJ the right answer.

The idea that Graendal did it is in my eyes a typical bandwagon effect. Although not much indicates that Graendal is the killer before LoC, people just accept it as the obvious answer, because it seems comfortable. But if one actually looks at the mystery, Graendal simply doesn't make much sense.

That said, I still think that Graendal is the best suspect after Slayer, because the other candidates fit even less than Graendal.
Reply to message
An analysis of Asmodean's last seconds - 27/05/2010 12:12:50 PM 2635 Views
I hate to say it, as I love this mystery.... - 27/05/2010 03:01:08 PM 1379 Views
Surely, there can never be enough Asmo threads! *NM* - 27/05/2010 04:18:06 PM 740 Views
I have a theory on the killer that doesn't involve Slayer... - 28/05/2010 03:41:23 AM 1180 Views
It's not really obvious... - 28/05/2010 09:08:27 AM 1121 Views
In addition to Etzel's comments - 28/05/2010 09:08:45 PM 1027 Views
Far-fetched, IMO - 27/05/2010 04:01:05 PM 1477 Views
very well said *NM* - 27/05/2010 04:19:10 PM 765 Views
I don't want Slayer to be the killer - 27/05/2010 04:33:06 PM 1166 Views
The way you twist things, it certainly seems so! - 27/05/2010 05:07:22 PM 1261 Views
Bah, hogwash! - 27/05/2010 05:17:37 PM 1125 Views
Re: Bah, hogwash! - 27/05/2010 08:14:16 PM 1171 Views
The point is... - 28/05/2010 08:38:49 AM 1211 Views
Yes, but Fain is a far cry from your average non-channeler - 28/05/2010 12:01:44 PM 1263 Views
As is Slayer - 28/05/2010 12:25:07 PM 1118 Views
There is no evidence of this at all - 28/05/2010 12:32:37 PM 1096 Views
Yeah, the evil guys don't manage to harm the good guys - 28/05/2010 12:38:57 PM 1066 Views
so far we've seen Slayer kill a sleeping guy and his wife - 28/05/2010 12:45:14 PM 1089 Views
I disagree. *NM* - 28/05/2010 12:50:02 PM 1203 Views
You always twist the quotes to make them say what Jordan didn't intend to say.... - 28/05/2010 02:20:09 PM 1159 Views
I think this is your interpretation - 28/05/2010 02:50:14 PM 1104 Views
Yeah right... - 27/05/2010 08:35:35 PM 1196 Views
See my replies above. *NM* - 28/05/2010 08:40:42 AM 990 Views
Re: Bah, hogwash! - 28/05/2010 08:28:16 AM 985 Views
See my repy to DomA. *NM* - 28/05/2010 08:39:15 AM 953 Views
None of this explains how Slayer had opportunity that others didn't - 27/05/2010 05:12:48 PM 1309 Views
We often see... - 27/05/2010 05:33:19 PM 1171 Views
I just keep coming back to Slayer needs wild explanations while Graendal is more obvious - 27/05/2010 05:52:13 PM 1240 Views
Ok, as we said in the other thread, let's RAFO! *NM* - 27/05/2010 05:57:49 PM 1253 Views
Agreed *NM* - 27/05/2010 06:03:51 PM 690 Views
Indeed - 28/05/2010 08:39:14 AM 1096 Views
Well... - 28/05/2010 10:19:46 AM 1171 Views
Re: Well... - 28/05/2010 12:20:15 PM 1161 Views
I adressed the points regarding the Fain-comparsion above - 28/05/2010 12:35:08 PM 1098 Views
your Slayer theory is ridiculously complex! - 28/05/2010 12:37:08 PM 1147 Views
It just requires to combine some clues from the first 5 books & some common sense - 28/05/2010 12:44:10 PM 1108 Views
common sense? - 28/05/2010 12:51:25 PM 1108 Views
See my posts above. *NM* - 28/05/2010 02:50:56 PM 1119 Views
Re: Well... - 28/05/2010 02:27:40 PM 1263 Views
No... - 28/05/2010 03:04:41 PM 1187 Views
let's try this another way - 28/05/2010 03:14:07 PM 1175 Views
The main problem with Graendal is... - 28/05/2010 05:31:09 PM 1092 Views
Graendal has a pretty significant role in TFoH - 28/05/2010 06:54:39 PM 1179 Views
Re: The main problem with Graendal is... - 28/05/2010 09:20:27 PM 1240 Views
my first thought was it was Sammael or Graendal. Come LoC it was clear to me that it was Graendal. - 28/05/2010 09:44:38 PM 1304 Views
RJ used the expression... - 29/05/2010 08:17:08 AM 1079 Views
be careful ... your stretching far enough you might hurt yourself - 29/05/2010 01:12:29 PM 1182 Views
Re: No... - 28/05/2010 03:38:49 PM 1059 Views
Re: I don't want Slayer to be the killer - 27/05/2010 07:47:40 PM 1131 Views
Couple of questions - 27/05/2010 09:53:05 PM 1159 Views
Be'lal managed to get out NO! - 27/05/2010 10:08:33 PM 1010 Views
Hmmm - 27/05/2010 10:27:55 PM 1129 Views
Re: Hmmm - 27/05/2010 10:34:30 PM 1016 Views
I don't think you can actually cut BF weaves - 27/05/2010 10:45:34 PM 1042 Views
Hmmm I wonder about that. - 27/05/2010 10:58:46 PM 1102 Views
I think it would be impossible for someone to react that quickly - 27/05/2010 11:13:01 PM 1190 Views
We've seen it done. - 28/05/2010 06:32:08 PM 1043 Views
Not the same thing - 28/05/2010 07:00:13 PM 1019 Views
Re: Couple of questions - 28/05/2010 03:29:29 PM 1191 Views
As said... - 28/05/2010 08:36:28 AM 1135 Views
Of course you do. Trying to deny it is just silly. Everyone knows your bias. *NM* - 27/05/2010 08:43:18 PM 583 Views
No, seriously, if actually Graendal did it, it's ok to me, too - 27/05/2010 09:08:48 PM 1150 Views
Re: No, seriously, if actually Graendal did it, it's ok to me, too - 28/05/2010 08:25:46 AM 1136 Views
But look... - 28/05/2010 09:01:12 AM 1159 Views
if there are clues in TFoH I find it hard to believe that Slayer is involved - 28/05/2010 12:29:40 PM 1053 Views
The scene of Asmo's murder contains clues, of course - 28/05/2010 12:32:13 PM 1128 Views
Re: The scene of Asmo's murder contains clues, of course - 28/05/2010 12:35:22 PM 1127 Views
RJ said the main clues are in the books before LoC. *NM* - 28/05/2010 12:40:23 PM 1178 Views
Re: RJ said the main clues are in the books before LoC. *NM* - 28/05/2010 12:52:30 PM 1045 Views
Yeah, I know. *NM* - 28/05/2010 02:51:32 PM 1114 Views
??? - 28/05/2010 02:19:17 PM 1092 Views
Of course RJ implied that. You should read his quotes about Asmo! *NM* - 28/05/2010 02:52:32 PM 1113 Views
Here is what RJ said EDIT - 28/05/2010 03:29:19 PM 888 Views
Indeed - 28/05/2010 05:18:35 PM 1053 Views
Re: Indeed - 28/05/2010 05:26:38 PM 1020 Views
LOL!! - 28/05/2010 03:29:35 PM 857 Views
Too much? - 28/05/2010 05:16:44 PM 1115 Views
Re: Far-fetched, IMO - 02/06/2010 07:34:58 PM 1237 Views
Sent by whom? And how on earth would he be expected to interrupt a Forsaken plot? *NM* - 02/06/2010 11:13:04 PM 698 Views
Re: Sent by whom? And how on earth would he be expected to interrupt a Forsaken plot? - 19/06/2010 12:59:54 AM 943 Views
Slayer takes orders from the Forsaken - 19/06/2010 03:30:37 AM 1142 Views
Re: Slayer takes orders from the Forsaken - 24/06/2010 09:03:18 AM 1361 Views
The orders to not kill Rand didn't happen until the next book - 26/06/2010 02:32:26 PM 854 Views
Re: The orders to not kill Rand didn't happen until the next book - 01/07/2010 10:13:53 PM 1272 Views
Re: An analysis of Asmodean's last seconds - 27/05/2010 06:19:18 PM 1062 Views
Re: An analysis of Asmodean's last seconds - 27/05/2010 09:16:21 PM 1072 Views
Lanfear killed Asmo..... - 28/05/2010 05:05:55 AM 1043 Views
Doesn't make sense - 28/05/2010 11:09:14 AM 1081 Views
Sorry, Lanfear did it..... - 29/05/2010 03:47:44 AM 1011 Views
Death is Moridin "when death took him"; need I say more *NM* - 28/05/2010 10:07:14 AM 699 Views
There is a quote that refutes this... - 28/05/2010 10:22:12 AM 1122 Views
I think I found an RJ quote that kills the Slayer theory - 29/05/2010 01:57:20 PM 1027 Views
If Slayer is actually the killer... - 29/05/2010 02:20:32 PM 1096 Views
Please, RJ would do as he always had and immediately RAFOd a question like that - 29/05/2010 02:26:10 PM 1073 Views
Well, I don't think so. - 29/05/2010 02:43:28 PM 1085 Views
yet he never gave an answer like this one - 29/05/2010 02:57:35 PM 1163 Views
Again... - 29/05/2010 03:09:06 PM 1159 Views
Taking things NO - 29/05/2010 03:12:24 PM 1126 Views
RJ pretty much said it wasn't Slayer. - 06/06/2010 05:44:05 AM 963 Views
If Slayer never met Asmo in the books he could not have killed him - 06/06/2010 12:46:40 PM 960 Views
But Slayer could have met Asmo, when he was killed.. *NM* - 06/06/2010 01:06:01 PM 1020 Views
Directly contradicts what RJ said "they did not meet in the books" - 06/06/2010 02:51:50 PM 971 Views
Not "before" the murder. *NM* - 06/06/2010 06:03:34 PM 1021 Views
Re: Not "before" the murder. *NM* - 06/06/2010 10:25:16 PM 973 Views
He answers the question, if they met "before" the murder. *NM* - 07/06/2010 07:18:50 AM 690 Views
not if it didn't happen in the books - 07/06/2010 12:08:34 PM 907 Views
I'm relieved then... - 07/06/2010 12:13:58 PM 912 Views
it's nearly as simplistic as knowing Graendal did it - 07/06/2010 12:48:42 PM 1045 Views
Compilation of the clues I could find on Slayer and Graendal - 29/05/2010 04:26:58 PM 1170 Views
I think Asmo's killer was as surprised as he. - 29/05/2010 09:26:03 PM 1088 Views
That's what I've always thought as well. - 29/05/2010 10:06:56 PM 1014 Views
That's always been my theory too - 29/05/2010 10:18:30 PM 1118 Views
*nods* - 29/05/2010 11:23:18 PM 1132 Views
Re: That's always been my theory too - 30/05/2010 07:35:50 AM 1054 Views
You know, there's no direct proof suggesting that Asmo's killer was "surprised"..... - 01/06/2010 04:04:56 AM 1005 Views
That's why I said "I think" and offered my opinion. - 01/06/2010 09:46:09 PM 1055 Views
except the Author said it was a murder of opportunity - 01/06/2010 11:13:14 PM 1032 Views
That is simply false. - 02/06/2010 10:00:27 AM 1097 Views
RJ stated it was a murder of opportunity ... I never said "only" - 02/06/2010 11:49:23 AM 1148 Views
Of course, it is false - 02/06/2010 12:13:11 PM 1067 Views
Here are the quotes - 02/06/2010 12:39:29 PM 998 Views
As said, those quotes simply don't support that the murder was basically just an unplanned accident. *NM* - 02/06/2010 02:14:29 PM 686 Views
I disagree. It's pretty much black and white that the opportunity/timing is the key factor to - 02/06/2010 02:39:03 PM 926 Views
Actually I like it because it fits Slayer better than Graendal, as pointed out. *NM* - 02/06/2010 02:51:24 PM 546 Views
that makes no sense at all *NM* - 02/06/2010 02:53:28 PM 739 Views
RJ pretty much said it wasn't Slayer. - 06/06/2010 05:47:13 AM 1091 Views
Well... - 06/06/2010 10:46:13 AM 1086 Views
Logic - 06/06/2010 02:53:27 PM 1049 Views
You're falling into Etzelian logic there... - 06/06/2010 03:25:30 PM 1043 Views
I'm just being a smartass *NM* - 06/06/2010 03:36:00 PM 715 Views
It's good that Etzel sticks to his guns - 06/06/2010 04:42:01 PM 1154 Views
OMG, Taim and Mesaana were getting it on in the pantry - 06/06/2010 09:49:57 PM 1016 Views
That reminds me... - 19/06/2010 04:46:58 AM 1038 Views
That's not anyone's logic, this argument is simply utter nonsense. *NM* - 07/06/2010 12:08:05 PM 1080 Views
just like thinking Slayer was the killer is - 07/06/2010 12:09:34 PM 1025 Views
Yeah... - 07/06/2010 12:21:31 PM 1128 Views
thinking the top assassin killed someone when it's been stated over and over - 07/06/2010 12:56:48 PM 1080 Views
Those quotes pretty much show that Graendal is careful... *NM* - 07/06/2010 01:03:26 PM 1065 Views
No they show that she is deliberate! - 07/06/2010 01:12:29 PM 1106 Views
That are just semantics - 07/06/2010 01:36:12 PM 1183 Views
and you think it's obvious that Slayer was the premier Shadow assassin prior to WH? - 07/06/2010 02:06:47 PM 1062 Views
As I explained you several times, I can see why RJ thought it is obvious, yes... - 07/06/2010 02:17:01 PM 1024 Views
Why wouldn't Graendal head to Caemlyn at that point? - 07/06/2010 02:36:24 PM 1112 Views
And where was she then, when Rand attacked Rahvin? - 07/06/2010 02:54:33 PM 1156 Views
Re: And where was she then, when Rand attacked Rahvin? - 07/06/2010 03:01:14 PM 1116 Views
You should re-read the scene where Moghedien tells Nynaeve about it... - 07/06/2010 03:12:55 PM 1149 Views
That's a different thing than Moghedien saying the plan was canceled - 07/06/2010 03:15:32 PM 1192 Views
That is essentially what Moghedien said. - 07/06/2010 03:33:35 PM 945 Views
um no it's not - 07/06/2010 04:17:04 PM 1037 Views
It's told after that... - 07/06/2010 04:46:31 PM 995 Views
No it doesn't. It tells us that Rahvin, just like all the others had a side plan in place - 07/06/2010 04:55:43 PM 1147 Views
Yeah... - 07/06/2010 05:17:59 PM 1080 Views
Funny I feel the same way you do ... - 07/06/2010 05:25:48 PM 1068 Views
Ah, whatever... - 07/06/2010 05:35:22 PM 994 Views
We are on the exact same page - 07/06/2010 05:42:48 PM 1045 Views
Re: We are on the exact same page - 07/06/2010 05:52:37 PM 1120 Views
LMAO - 07/06/2010 06:07:16 PM 1500 Views
I promised Etzel long ago... - 19/06/2010 04:49:11 AM 1059 Views

Reply to Message