Active Users:690 Time:04/08/2025 06:48:06 PM
? Yes, I am aware of this Isaac Send a noteboard - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM
It say's it's not from LTT memories... It was from Rand's, and he seen Justice in book 2.


IT doesn't mean it isn't LTT's just because of that, he could have seen a picture of it during his studies. Besides, the 'oddly enough' remark implies he'd think it was something LTT might know too. Rand doesn't say things like 'oddly enough' regarding his normal memories. If Justice was not power-wrought, then it would probably be a rusted heap of garbage after a thousand years of being lost, if it was power-wrought it would have had an AoL owner, that could have been LTT. I could easily see Almasan having a sword he claimed was LTT's and Hawkwing taking it for his own as a trophy. Then Rand and LTT both remember it, Rand from Falme.
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein

King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1306 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 778 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 828 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 721 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 721 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 790 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 764 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 722 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 697 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 759 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 905 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 726 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 713 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 667 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 740 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 666 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 626 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 710 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 856 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 789 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 712 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 713 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 725 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 684 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 658 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1173 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 749 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 703 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 662 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 695 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 661 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 760 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 743 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 704 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 680 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 678 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 650 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 730 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 778 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 769 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 694 Views

Reply to Message