Active Users:615 Time:24/06/2026 10:09:10 PM
Ockham's Razor Kieran Send a noteboard - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM
Ok let's look at this again,

Name of possible source: Artur Paendrag Tanreall

Name of character he is a type and shadow of: Arthur Pendragon

Arthur means: Long Bear.
Pendragon means: Head of the dragon.

Arthur's father Uther Pendraon's banner: Golden Dragon

Of course we know that Rand AL'THOR also draws symbolism from Mr sword in the stone. Does that mean that only he can have a dragon banner? No, of course not, several of the characters in the WoT world draw from the same sources. If fact even from Arthurian legends there were several people who have a dragon on their banner. Since a particular animal generally is put on a banner to claim a certain characteristic for it's owner, it seems inevitable that the dragon will come up multiple times.

So anyway...maybe thats why he would have a sword with the symbol of the person he symbolizes.
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1547 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 1007 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 1034 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 948 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 971 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 1023 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 990 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 935 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 908 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 1008 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 1156 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 958 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 965 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 879 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 950 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 887 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 857 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 934 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 1104 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 1010 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 953 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 933 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 954 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 935 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 914 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1451 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 976 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 943 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 913 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 927 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 858 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 973 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 998 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 941 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 892 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 881 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 861 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 963 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 1020 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 970 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 910 Views

Reply to Message