Active Users:763 Time:04/02/2026 11:14:37 PM
Ockham's Razor Kieran Send a noteboard - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM
Ok let's look at this again,

Name of possible source: Artur Paendrag Tanreall

Name of character he is a type and shadow of: Arthur Pendragon

Arthur means: Long Bear.
Pendragon means: Head of the dragon.

Arthur's father Uther Pendraon's banner: Golden Dragon

Of course we know that Rand AL'THOR also draws symbolism from Mr sword in the stone. Does that mean that only he can have a dragon banner? No, of course not, several of the characters in the WoT world draw from the same sources. If fact even from Arthurian legends there were several people who have a dragon on their banner. Since a particular animal generally is put on a banner to claim a certain characteristic for it's owner, it seems inevitable that the dragon will come up multiple times.

So anyway...maybe thats why he would have a sword with the symbol of the person he symbolizes.
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1448 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 920 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 945 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 854 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 867 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 931 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 888 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 843 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 815 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 908 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 1065 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 859 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 861 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 787 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 869 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 796 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 767 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 840 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 1008 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 908 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 857 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 839 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 861 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 832 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 810 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1345 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 883 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 834 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 815 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 837 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 775 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 884 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 894 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 845 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 786 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 781 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 767 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 860 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 924 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 889 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 817 Views

Reply to Message