Active Users:337 Time:17/06/2025 12:48:52 PM
Ockham's Razor Kieran Send a noteboard - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM
Ok let's look at this again,

Name of possible source: Artur Paendrag Tanreall

Name of character he is a type and shadow of: Arthur Pendragon

Arthur means: Long Bear.
Pendragon means: Head of the dragon.

Arthur's father Uther Pendraon's banner: Golden Dragon

Of course we know that Rand AL'THOR also draws symbolism from Mr sword in the stone. Does that mean that only he can have a dragon banner? No, of course not, several of the characters in the WoT world draw from the same sources. If fact even from Arthurian legends there were several people who have a dragon on their banner. Since a particular animal generally is put on a banner to claim a certain characteristic for it's owner, it seems inevitable that the dragon will come up multiple times.

So anyway...maybe thats why he would have a sword with the symbol of the person he symbolizes.
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1287 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 762 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 811 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 708 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 704 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 765 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 747 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 707 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 678 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 740 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 865 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 708 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 683 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 647 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 717 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 646 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 607 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 696 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 836 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 774 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 696 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 690 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 705 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 658 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 639 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1152 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 720 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 679 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 632 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 680 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 642 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 747 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 718 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 689 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 664 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 667 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 633 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 708 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 760 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 745 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 677 Views

Reply to Message