Active Users:1057 Time:15/12/2025 10:54:14 PM
Ockham's Razor Kieran Send a noteboard - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM
Ok let's look at this again,

Name of possible source: Artur Paendrag Tanreall

Name of character he is a type and shadow of: Arthur Pendragon

Arthur means: Long Bear.
Pendragon means: Head of the dragon.

Arthur's father Uther Pendraon's banner: Golden Dragon

Of course we know that Rand AL'THOR also draws symbolism from Mr sword in the stone. Does that mean that only he can have a dragon banner? No, of course not, several of the characters in the WoT world draw from the same sources. If fact even from Arthurian legends there were several people who have a dragon on their banner. Since a particular animal generally is put on a banner to claim a certain characteristic for it's owner, it seems inevitable that the dragon will come up multiple times.

So anyway...maybe thats why he would have a sword with the symbol of the person he symbolizes.
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1422 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 887 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 914 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 813 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 822 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 899 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 870 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 812 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 790 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 871 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 1040 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 837 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 838 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 752 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 842 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 764 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 735 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 811 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 968 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 884 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 831 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 812 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 826 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 783 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 782 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1307 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 859 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 808 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 782 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 819 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 737 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 855 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 863 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 817 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 764 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 747 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 744 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 826 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 890 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 861 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 790 Views

Reply to Message