Active Users:341 Time:02/05/2025 09:06:36 AM
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! NaClH2O Send a noteboard - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM
Arthur Pendragon would mean nothing to Hawkwing! Pendragon is from a different universe! In fact the dragon as a mythical beast is quite rare in the Wotverse, possibly because of the associations with Lews Therin Kinslayer. The sigil of Hawkwing was a golden hawk on blue. It was his enemy Guaire Amalasan who declared himself the Dragon, not Hawkwing! Why would Artur Tanreall paint his enemy's sigil on his own sword? It doesn't make sense at all.

NaCl(Hawkwing was called the Hammer, I could understand it if that was painted on his scabbard)H2O +<img class=' />
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1266 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 744 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 779 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 690 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 687 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 748 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 731 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 692 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 663 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 722 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 825 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 696 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 666 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 626 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 703 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 627 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 593 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 679 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 817 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 752 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 679 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 674 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 690 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 639 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 622 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1133 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 709 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 660 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 612 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 660 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 623 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 728 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 699 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 668 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 643 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 650 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 612 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 690 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 740 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 727 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 657 Views

Reply to Message