Active Users:464 Time:18/09/2025 11:31:59 PM
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! NaClH2O Send a noteboard - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM
Arthur Pendragon would mean nothing to Hawkwing! Pendragon is from a different universe! In fact the dragon as a mythical beast is quite rare in the Wotverse, possibly because of the associations with Lews Therin Kinslayer. The sigil of Hawkwing was a golden hawk on blue. It was his enemy Guaire Amalasan who declared himself the Dragon, not Hawkwing! Why would Artur Tanreall paint his enemy's sigil on his own sword? It doesn't make sense at all.

NaCl(Hawkwing was called the Hammer, I could understand it if that was painted on his scabbard)H2O +<img class=' />
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1334 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 817 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 850 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 757 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 752 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 831 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 792 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 751 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 725 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 790 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 944 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 754 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 757 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 690 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 770 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 690 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 659 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 737 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 888 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 818 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 748 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 735 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 749 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 714 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 699 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1203 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 789 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 730 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 710 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 724 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 687 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 792 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 771 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 725 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 705 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 706 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 675 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 760 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 805 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 793 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 722 Views

Reply to Message