Active Users:446 Time:18/09/2025 09:05:20 PM
I disagree about the TP aspect darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 25/07/2010 03:30:37 PM
It makes no real sense that the Moridin first wanted Semirhage to capture Rand with the DB in KoD (as stated in TGS, prologue). Then SH actually frees Semirhage to try it again. Exactly in the moment, when she succeeds, when Rand is breaking, since he is killing Min, the DO would prevent this by saving Min and killing Semirhage due to giving Rand access to the TP.

It makes more sense that Rand managed to take the TP through the link to Moridin and that the Shadow couldn't foresee this. If Rand wouldn't have done this, the Shadow had likely won, because Rand would be a prisoner at SG, tortured by Semirhage, and Min dead.


The more I think about it the less I believe it is possible for the TP to be accessed through the link without the DO allowing it. Sure the link may have enabled the situation, but the DO could have shut Rand down pretty easily if he'd wanted too. The TP is essence of the DO so I have a hard time believing Rand could have used it without him immediately knowing what was up.

Personally I think the DO simply took advantage of the situation and sacrificed Semirhage when he realized he had an opportunity to get Rand addicted to the TP. As the quote in the original post points out the goal was to capture and TURN your opponents piece, sacrificing your own pieces in order to achieve it.
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
foreshadowing of Semirhage's death - 25/07/2010 07:13:48 AM 1705 Views
I don't think that Semirhage was sacrificed - 25/07/2010 08:36:47 AM 909 Views
No, too tired to give reasons... *NM* - 25/07/2010 09:30:46 AM 292 Views
Re: No, too tired to give reasons... *NM* - 26/07/2010 01:19:26 AM 296 Views
I disagree about the TP aspect - 25/07/2010 03:30:37 PM 817 Views
Re: I disagree about the TP aspect - 25/07/2010 04:03:45 PM 814 Views
It's an interesting theory in either direction - 25/07/2010 04:54:31 PM 763 Views
Re: It's an interesting theory in either direction - 26/07/2010 02:17:35 AM 605 Views
You can't expect BS to give away things with 2 books to go. - 26/07/2010 01:48:37 AM 682 Views
Re: You can't expect BS to give away things with 2 books to go. - 26/07/2010 02:24:29 AM 640 Views
Re: I disagree about the TP aspect - 26/07/2010 01:22:30 AM 640 Views
Re: I disagree about the TP aspect - 26/07/2010 02:30:11 AM 608 Views
^^^what Datakim said^^^ - 26/07/2010 06:58:02 PM 639 Views
I don't know if Semirhage was sacrificed or not. Either way the Semirhage quote set up tGS 6 books - 26/07/2010 02:29:59 AM 713 Views
You were right the first time - 26/07/2010 03:02:22 AM 733 Views
I think the question is... - 26/07/2010 08:27:17 AM 661 Views
Re: I think the question is... - 27/07/2010 12:43:44 AM 654 Views
Re: I think the question is... - 27/07/2010 01:15:29 AM 667 Views
Re: I think the question is... - 27/07/2010 02:10:41 AM 637 Views
Re: I think the question is... - 27/07/2010 03:17:01 AM 703 Views
Re: I think the question is... - 27/07/2010 05:08:59 AM 712 Views
Re: I think the question is... - 27/07/2010 05:59:37 PM 686 Views
I'd say that there was a pre-meditated plan or backup plan to sacrifice Semirhage - 26/07/2010 09:02:44 AM 696 Views
I think SH simply didn't care about the CK access key - 26/07/2010 09:17:11 AM 643 Views
Re: I think SH simply didn't care about the CK access key - 26/07/2010 12:10:43 PM 628 Views
Re: I think SH simply didn't care about the CK access key - 26/07/2010 12:27:11 PM 710 Views
But if this was the plan... - 26/07/2010 12:30:37 PM 624 Views
Moridin and SH knew that the CK could never defeat the dark one so they were happy to leave it - 26/07/2010 05:56:56 PM 707 Views
Unlikely, and stupid if true - 26/07/2010 06:12:30 PM 635 Views
That wasn't the Choedan Kal, that was Shadar Logoth. - 27/07/2010 12:11:46 AM 589 Views
Re: That wasn't the Choedan Kal, that was Shadar Logoth. - 27/07/2010 01:29:29 AM 608 Views
I fail to see the relevance. *NM* - 27/07/2010 02:06:27 AM 278 Views
the relevance is that it was impossible without the CK - 27/07/2010 05:25:45 AM 555 Views
Are you certain? - 27/07/2010 05:37:28 AM 604 Views
Re: Are you certain? - 27/07/2010 03:00:51 PM 649 Views
Re: Are you certain? - 27/07/2010 06:17:59 PM 622 Views
key word is "necessary" *NM* - 27/07/2010 05:14:19 AM 257 Views
Re: Unlikely, and stupid if true - 27/07/2010 01:36:53 AM 579 Views
Re: Unlikely, and stupid if true - 27/07/2010 02:19:22 AM 618 Views
Re: Unlikely, and stupid if true - 27/07/2010 02:43:39 AM 633 Views
Re: Unlikely, and stupid if true - 27/07/2010 03:17:49 AM 651 Views
Re: Unlikely, and stupid if true - 27/07/2010 03:39:07 AM 618 Views
Re: Unlikely, and stupid if true - 27/07/2010 04:26:31 AM 634 Views
Something still doesn't make sense in that theory though - 27/07/2010 07:15:22 AM 705 Views
Re: Unlikely, and stupid if true - 27/07/2010 01:44:19 AM 660 Views
Re: Unlikely, and stupid if true - 27/07/2010 05:31:03 AM 579 Views
Re: Unlikely, and stupid if true - 27/07/2010 03:53:20 PM 619 Views
??? The CK in the hands of a madman is exactly what the Dark One needs to destroy the pattern - 27/07/2010 07:01:13 AM 630 Views
So why not give it to Moridin then? - 27/07/2010 10:54:47 AM 629 Views
Re: I think SH simply didn't care about the CK access key - 27/07/2010 12:10:01 AM 585 Views
This has been seen and commented before, by myself and others. - 26/07/2010 03:36:51 PM 597 Views
Sorry I missed them. I would have been happy enough to comment there. - 27/07/2010 03:43:46 AM 645 Views
Considering there are years and years worth of comments... - 27/07/2010 02:49:42 PM 608 Views
Hands up if you don't believe in foreshadowing in this series - 26/07/2010 04:27:14 PM 660 Views
Re: Hands up if you don't believe in foreshadowing in this series - 26/07/2010 10:34:18 PM 575 Views
Prophesying, but not foreshadowing. - 27/07/2010 12:06:06 AM 541 Views
You confuse foreshadowing and predictability - 27/07/2010 02:57:15 AM 917 Views
I agree with DomA *NM* *NM* - 27/07/2010 03:44:51 AM 275 Views
I don't believe in foreshadowing that you can figure out from the actual plot. - 27/07/2010 08:42:11 PM 603 Views

Reply to Message