Active Users:768 Time:04/02/2026 11:15:11 PM
Maybe we're just reading it wrong Sidious Send a noteboard - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM
It could be Lews Therin's sword from the War of Power which was unearthed directly, or found in a stasis box.

1. If it's Power wrought it could have survived 3,000 years. Centuries don't preclude it from being millenia old... it's merely 30 centuries old.

2. He's surprised that it's from his own memories because the theme of the chapter is that the two men are merging mentally. Later he shouts directly at Lews Therin, which is also a first. Instead of it being read as a memory of Rand's, it might be his surprise that Lews Therin said nothing and that he recognized it. In essence, they're becoming one man.

It can't plausibly be a False Dragon's. Amalasan is no more a valid memory to Rand than it is to Lews Therin. Rand is 21 years old and he doesn't have Mat's memories. He's got his life experiences and Lews Therin's. It must logically be Lews Therin's that he's referring to, but he's just surprised that Lews Therin isn't the one mentioning it.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
This message last edited by Sidious on 09/09/2009 at 05:06:53 AM
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1448 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 920 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 945 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 854 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 867 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 932 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 888 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 843 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 815 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 908 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 1065 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 859 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 861 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 787 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 869 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 797 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 767 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 841 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 1009 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 908 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 857 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 839 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 861 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 832 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 811 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1345 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 883 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 834 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 815 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 838 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 775 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 884 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 895 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 846 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 786 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 781 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 767 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 860 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 924 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 889 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 817 Views

Reply to Message