Active Users:672 Time:22/03/2026 05:36:26 PM
Maybe we're just reading it wrong Sidious Send a noteboard - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM
It could be Lews Therin's sword from the War of Power which was unearthed directly, or found in a stasis box.

1. If it's Power wrought it could have survived 3,000 years. Centuries don't preclude it from being millenia old... it's merely 30 centuries old.

2. He's surprised that it's from his own memories because the theme of the chapter is that the two men are merging mentally. Later he shouts directly at Lews Therin, which is also a first. Instead of it being read as a memory of Rand's, it might be his surprise that Lews Therin said nothing and that he recognized it. In essence, they're becoming one man.

It can't plausibly be a False Dragon's. Amalasan is no more a valid memory to Rand than it is to Lews Therin. Rand is 21 years old and he doesn't have Mat's memories. He's got his life experiences and Lews Therin's. It must logically be Lews Therin's that he's referring to, but he's just surprised that Lews Therin isn't the one mentioning it.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
This message last edited by Sidious on 09/09/2009 at 05:06:53 AM
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1475 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 945 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 967 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 878 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 901 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 960 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 917 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 870 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 838 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 936 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 1092 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 882 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 883 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 810 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 892 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 820 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 789 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 867 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 1038 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 939 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 879 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 862 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 883 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 858 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 832 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1374 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 910 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 857 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 840 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 859 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 794 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 905 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 927 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 869 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 810 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 807 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 789 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 895 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 950 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 911 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 845 Views

Reply to Message