Active Users:345 Time:17/06/2025 01:27:49 PM
Maybe we're just reading it wrong Sidious Send a noteboard - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM
It could be Lews Therin's sword from the War of Power which was unearthed directly, or found in a stasis box.

1. If it's Power wrought it could have survived 3,000 years. Centuries don't preclude it from being millenia old... it's merely 30 centuries old.

2. He's surprised that it's from his own memories because the theme of the chapter is that the two men are merging mentally. Later he shouts directly at Lews Therin, which is also a first. Instead of it being read as a memory of Rand's, it might be his surprise that Lews Therin said nothing and that he recognized it. In essence, they're becoming one man.

It can't plausibly be a False Dragon's. Amalasan is no more a valid memory to Rand than it is to Lews Therin. Rand is 21 years old and he doesn't have Mat's memories. He's got his life experiences and Lews Therin's. It must logically be Lews Therin's that he's referring to, but he's just surprised that Lews Therin isn't the one mentioning it.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
This message last edited by Sidious on 09/09/2009 at 05:06:53 AM
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1288 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 763 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 812 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 709 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 704 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 765 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 747 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 707 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 678 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 741 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 866 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 708 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 683 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 647 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 718 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 646 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 608 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 696 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 837 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 774 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 696 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 691 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 706 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 659 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 640 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1153 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 721 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 680 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 632 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 681 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 643 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 748 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 719 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 690 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 664 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 667 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 634 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 709 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 760 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 746 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 678 Views

Reply to Message