Active Users:698 Time:24/06/2026 08:56:28 PM
Maybe we're just reading it wrong Sidious Send a noteboard - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM
It could be Lews Therin's sword from the War of Power which was unearthed directly, or found in a stasis box.

1. If it's Power wrought it could have survived 3,000 years. Centuries don't preclude it from being millenia old... it's merely 30 centuries old.

2. He's surprised that it's from his own memories because the theme of the chapter is that the two men are merging mentally. Later he shouts directly at Lews Therin, which is also a first. Instead of it being read as a memory of Rand's, it might be his surprise that Lews Therin said nothing and that he recognized it. In essence, they're becoming one man.

It can't plausibly be a False Dragon's. Amalasan is no more a valid memory to Rand than it is to Lews Therin. Rand is 21 years old and he doesn't have Mat's memories. He's got his life experiences and Lews Therin's. It must logically be Lews Therin's that he's referring to, but he's just surprised that Lews Therin isn't the one mentioning it.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
This message last edited by Sidious on 09/09/2009 at 05:06:53 AM
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1545 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 1007 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 1034 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 946 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 969 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 1021 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 988 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 935 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 906 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 1006 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 1155 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 957 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 963 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 877 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 949 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 885 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 855 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 933 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 1103 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 1009 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 951 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 931 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 952 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 934 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 912 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1450 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 974 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 941 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 911 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 926 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 856 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 973 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 996 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 940 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 891 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 879 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 859 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 961 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 1019 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 969 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 908 Views

Reply to Message