Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it
scalius Send a noteboard - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM
If it's true and the "oddly" is the narrator's voice that is VERY sloppy writing. The narrator should be completely neutral, not injecting his own suprise at what is happening in Rand's head, just reporting it. Also I'm not sure I like the implications of that. It could mean that every time we have an omniscient(sp?) pov we have to watch for editorial comments? I hope not. If it was narrator reporting I would have hoped for something along the line of "and it came from Rand's memories alone, not from LTT's".
NaCl(don't want to know what the narrator thinks, just what he sees)H2O
' />
NaCl(don't want to know what the narrator thinks, just what he sees)H2O
' />I agree, it's a bit sloppy, but in the end the narrator is stating exactly what you want. Namely, that the memory of the weapon came from Rand, and not from LTT, as most memories of old things do. There are mutiple instances of BS making it clear that the reader is gaining insight into Rand's personal thoughts. He uses both italics, and literally says it as well. I am the Dragon Reborn, Rand thought. I break all covenants and vows. How odd, that they should find this now, he thought, and make.... Light! he thought. I'm losing control.
For the rest, I see it as the narrator commenting from Rand's POV, giving insight into Rand's thoughts but not voicing them directly. For example, "How did the questioning go, Cadsuane Sedai?" he asked in a more moderate tone. This is not Rand's direct thought, that he asked in a moderate tone, it's the narrator letting us know what's happening. Or Cadsuane sipped her wine. Rand isn't directly thinking this, it's the observation from his POV, that the narrator is letting us in on. Or "This isn't art, Cadsuane," Rand said dryly. Rand is not thinking to himself "I said that dryly", it's the narrator letting us know.
So, we have Rand's direct thoughts....How odd, that they should find this now, he thought, and make a gift of it to me, completely unaware of what they were holding... which was followed immediately by the narrator informing us that Rand had taken to wearing the sword immediately (certainly Rand is not thinking to himself at this point "I began wearing the sword immediately" ), that if felt right in his hands, that he had told nobody he recognized the sword, and that the recognition came from Rand, and not LTT as one would expect given the "centuries old" bit and given that LTT is the primary source of much knowledge for Rand.
I would slave, to pave the way, to sink your ship of fools.
This message last edited by scalius on 09/09/2009 at 03:11:59 PM
Plot relevance of the sword
- 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM
1425 Views
Great
- 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM
919 Views
Re: Great
- 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM
821 Views
Re: Great
- 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM
827 Views
Re: Great
- 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM
1041 Views
I see that differently
- 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM
843 Views
Re: I see that differently
- 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM
756 Views
Nice
- 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM
814 Views
Re: Nice
- 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM
829 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this
- 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM
789 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this
- 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM
783 Views
I'd favor it being Justice, they probably tell us in the prologue
- 09/09/2009 05:46:37 PM
791 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak
- 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM
1313 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers
- 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM
861 Views
see above for part
- 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM
812 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it
- 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM
785 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it
- 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM
823 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want.
- 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM
742 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons?
- 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM
822 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak
- 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM
828 Views

