Active Users:343 Time:17/06/2025 01:29:42 PM
Re: I see that differently Kieran Send a noteboard - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM
Exactly, the narrator made the distinction that it was Rand who recognized the sword. That should solidly debunk the LTT's sword theory.

As far as the False Dragon's sword theory, that has no basis at all. It could be any of the false dragon's over the 'centuries'.

In regards to Justice theory, the only problem seems to be that some don't believe Artur would have a dragon on his scabbard because he was his enemy always. But...

"I have fought by your side times beyond number, Lews Therin, and faced you as many more..."


So he was his ally as often as his enemy...

"Something is wrong here, something holds me." Suddenly ht turned his sharp-eyed gaze on Rand. "You are here. Have you the banner?"


Hmm, how odd, he seems to need a certain banner, with a certain symbol on it to fight under. I wonder which symbol it could be?

"Yes." Rand tore open the straps of his saddlebags and pulled out the Dragon's banner.


Oh yeah, the dragon...

So apparently he Artur wasn't always the Dragon's enemy, and he would fight under the Dragon.
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1288 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 763 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 812 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 709 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 704 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 765 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 747 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 707 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 678 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 741 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 866 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 708 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 683 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 648 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 718 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 646 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 608 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 696 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 837 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 774 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 696 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 691 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 706 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 659 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 640 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1153 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 721 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 680 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 633 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 681 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 643 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 748 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 719 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 690 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 664 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 667 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 634 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 709 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 760 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 746 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 678 Views

Reply to Message