Active Users:858 Time:05/02/2026 12:40:09 AM
Re: I see that differently Kieran Send a noteboard - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM
Exactly, the narrator made the distinction that it was Rand who recognized the sword. That should solidly debunk the LTT's sword theory.

As far as the False Dragon's sword theory, that has no basis at all. It could be any of the false dragon's over the 'centuries'.

In regards to Justice theory, the only problem seems to be that some don't believe Artur would have a dragon on his scabbard because he was his enemy always. But...

"I have fought by your side times beyond number, Lews Therin, and faced you as many more..."


So he was his ally as often as his enemy...

"Something is wrong here, something holds me." Suddenly ht turned his sharp-eyed gaze on Rand. "You are here. Have you the banner?"


Hmm, how odd, he seems to need a certain banner, with a certain symbol on it to fight under. I wonder which symbol it could be?

"Yes." Rand tore open the straps of his saddlebags and pulled out the Dragon's banner.


Oh yeah, the dragon...

So apparently he Artur wasn't always the Dragon's enemy, and he would fight under the Dragon.
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1448 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 921 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 945 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 854 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 868 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 933 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 890 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 843 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 816 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 909 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 1065 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 859 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 862 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 788 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 869 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 797 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 767 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 841 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 1009 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 908 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 860 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 839 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 862 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 832 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 811 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1345 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 884 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 834 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 815 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 839 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 775 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 884 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 896 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 846 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 786 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 781 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 768 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 862 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 925 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 889 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 817 Views

Reply to Message