Active Users:354 Time:17/06/2025 11:54:26 AM
Re: I see that differently Kieran Send a noteboard - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM
Exactly, the narrator made the distinction that it was Rand who recognized the sword. That should solidly debunk the LTT's sword theory.

As far as the False Dragon's sword theory, that has no basis at all. It could be any of the false dragon's over the 'centuries'.

In regards to Justice theory, the only problem seems to be that some don't believe Artur would have a dragon on his scabbard because he was his enemy always. But...

"I have fought by your side times beyond number, Lews Therin, and faced you as many more..."


So he was his ally as often as his enemy...

"Something is wrong here, something holds me." Suddenly ht turned his sharp-eyed gaze on Rand. "You are here. Have you the banner?"


Hmm, how odd, he seems to need a certain banner, with a certain symbol on it to fight under. I wonder which symbol it could be?

"Yes." Rand tore open the straps of his saddlebags and pulled out the Dragon's banner.


Oh yeah, the dragon...

So apparently he Artur wasn't always the Dragon's enemy, and he would fight under the Dragon.
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1287 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 761 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 810 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 708 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 703 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 765 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 747 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 707 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 677 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 740 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 864 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 708 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 683 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 647 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 717 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 646 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 607 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 695 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 835 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 774 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 695 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 690 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 705 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 657 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 639 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1151 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 719 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 679 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 631 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 680 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 642 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 746 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 718 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 688 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 664 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 667 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 633 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 708 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 759 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 744 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 676 Views

Reply to Message