Active Users:682 Time:09/08/2026 10:43:42 PM
Re: I see that differently Kieran Send a noteboard - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM
Exactly, the narrator made the distinction that it was Rand who recognized the sword. That should solidly debunk the LTT's sword theory.

As far as the False Dragon's sword theory, that has no basis at all. It could be any of the false dragon's over the 'centuries'.

In regards to Justice theory, the only problem seems to be that some don't believe Artur would have a dragon on his scabbard because he was his enemy always. But...

"I have fought by your side times beyond number, Lews Therin, and faced you as many more..."


So he was his ally as often as his enemy...

"Something is wrong here, something holds me." Suddenly ht turned his sharp-eyed gaze on Rand. "You are here. Have you the banner?"


Hmm, how odd, he seems to need a certain banner, with a certain symbol on it to fight under. I wonder which symbol it could be?

"Yes." Rand tore open the straps of his saddlebags and pulled out the Dragon's banner.


Oh yeah, the dragon...

So apparently he Artur wasn't always the Dragon's enemy, and he would fight under the Dragon.
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1598 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 1063 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 1078 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 991 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 1020 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 1071 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 1039 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 970 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 958 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 1056 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 1198 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 1005 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 1014 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 927 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 990 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 923 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 896 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 974 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 1153 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 1065 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 1000 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 981 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 999 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 985 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 962 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1514 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 1018 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 974 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 957 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 976 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 900 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 1020 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 1043 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 991 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 940 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 928 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 906 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 1003 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 1068 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 1006 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 953 Views

Reply to Message