Active Users:647 Time:22/03/2026 05:49:30 PM
Re: I see that differently Kieran Send a noteboard - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM
Exactly, the narrator made the distinction that it was Rand who recognized the sword. That should solidly debunk the LTT's sword theory.

As far as the False Dragon's sword theory, that has no basis at all. It could be any of the false dragon's over the 'centuries'.

In regards to Justice theory, the only problem seems to be that some don't believe Artur would have a dragon on his scabbard because he was his enemy always. But...

"I have fought by your side times beyond number, Lews Therin, and faced you as many more..."


So he was his ally as often as his enemy...

"Something is wrong here, something holds me." Suddenly ht turned his sharp-eyed gaze on Rand. "You are here. Have you the banner?"


Hmm, how odd, he seems to need a certain banner, with a certain symbol on it to fight under. I wonder which symbol it could be?

"Yes." Rand tore open the straps of his saddlebags and pulled out the Dragon's banner.


Oh yeah, the dragon...

So apparently he Artur wasn't always the Dragon's enemy, and he would fight under the Dragon.
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1477 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 946 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 967 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 880 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 904 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 962 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 919 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 871 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 838 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 939 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 1094 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 885 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 885 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 812 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 894 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 822 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 792 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 867 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 1039 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 939 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 879 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 864 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 885 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 859 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 833 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1376 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 912 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 859 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 841 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 860 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 797 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 907 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 928 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 870 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 813 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 809 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 792 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 897 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 952 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 912 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 847 Views

Reply to Message