Active Users:752 Time:04/02/2026 11:11:59 PM
Re: I see that differently Kieran Send a noteboard - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM
Exactly, the narrator made the distinction that it was Rand who recognized the sword. That should solidly debunk the LTT's sword theory.

As far as the False Dragon's sword theory, that has no basis at all. It could be any of the false dragon's over the 'centuries'.

In regards to Justice theory, the only problem seems to be that some don't believe Artur would have a dragon on his scabbard because he was his enemy always. But...

"I have fought by your side times beyond number, Lews Therin, and faced you as many more..."


So he was his ally as often as his enemy...

"Something is wrong here, something holds me." Suddenly ht turned his sharp-eyed gaze on Rand. "You are here. Have you the banner?"


Hmm, how odd, he seems to need a certain banner, with a certain symbol on it to fight under. I wonder which symbol it could be?

"Yes." Rand tore open the straps of his saddlebags and pulled out the Dragon's banner.


Oh yeah, the dragon...

So apparently he Artur wasn't always the Dragon's enemy, and he would fight under the Dragon.
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1447 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 920 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 945 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 854 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 866 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 930 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 888 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 843 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 814 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 907 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 1064 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 859 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 861 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 786 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 869 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 795 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 765 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 840 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 1007 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 908 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 857 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 838 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 861 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 831 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 809 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1345 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 883 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 833 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 814 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 837 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 775 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 884 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 893 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 844 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 786 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 781 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 767 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 860 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 924 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 889 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 817 Views

Reply to Message