Active Users:929 Time:09/08/2026 10:39:49 PM
No, He's giving me way more than I want. NaClH2O Send a noteboard - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM
I understand how omniscient voice works. What I DON'T want from that writing voice is editorializing. I have no need of and don't want to know how the narrator feels about anyone's thoughts. All I want is the pure thought. This is along the same lines as learning that the narrator thinks that a particular thought from say Elayne is slutty, or one from Nynaeve is timid or whatever. Bad bad writing. An omniscient narrator should do ONLY narration, no commenting, editorializing or any other 3rd party stuff. I really don't care and really really really don't want to know what the narrator thinks, only what the characters think. Interpretation should be left to the reader, and reader alone.

NaCl(climbs down from the soapbox )H2O +<img class=' />

edit: eliminated the stupid mo smiley
This message last edited by NaClH2O on 09/09/2009 at 05:29:11 PM
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1596 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 1063 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 1078 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 991 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 1020 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 1070 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 1038 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 970 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 958 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 1056 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 1198 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 1005 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 1013 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 925 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 988 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 922 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 895 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 972 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 1152 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 1064 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 998 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 980 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 999 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 985 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 961 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1514 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 1017 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 974 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 957 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 976 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 900 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 1020 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 1042 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 991 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 939 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 927 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 905 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 1001 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 1067 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 1004 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 953 Views

Reply to Message