Active Users:624 Time:24/06/2026 10:11:49 PM
No, He's giving me way more than I want. NaClH2O Send a noteboard - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM
I understand how omniscient voice works. What I DON'T want from that writing voice is editorializing. I have no need of and don't want to know how the narrator feels about anyone's thoughts. All I want is the pure thought. This is along the same lines as learning that the narrator thinks that a particular thought from say Elayne is slutty, or one from Nynaeve is timid or whatever. Bad bad writing. An omniscient narrator should do ONLY narration, no commenting, editorializing or any other 3rd party stuff. I really don't care and really really really don't want to know what the narrator thinks, only what the characters think. Interpretation should be left to the reader, and reader alone.

NaCl(climbs down from the soapbox )H2O +<img class=' />

edit: eliminated the stupid mo smiley
This message last edited by NaClH2O on 09/09/2009 at 05:29:11 PM
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1547 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 1009 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 1034 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 948 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 973 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 1023 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 991 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 936 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 909 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 1010 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 1156 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 959 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 966 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 880 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 952 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 888 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 858 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 936 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 1105 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 1011 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 953 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 934 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 954 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 935 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 915 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1453 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 977 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 943 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 915 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 928 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 860 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 973 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 998 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 941 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 893 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 882 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 863 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 963 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 1021 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 971 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 912 Views

Reply to Message