Active Users:333 Time:17/06/2025 12:49:38 PM
No, He's giving me way more than I want. NaClH2O Send a noteboard - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM
I understand how omniscient voice works. What I DON'T want from that writing voice is editorializing. I have no need of and don't want to know how the narrator feels about anyone's thoughts. All I want is the pure thought. This is along the same lines as learning that the narrator thinks that a particular thought from say Elayne is slutty, or one from Nynaeve is timid or whatever. Bad bad writing. An omniscient narrator should do ONLY narration, no commenting, editorializing or any other 3rd party stuff. I really don't care and really really really don't want to know what the narrator thinks, only what the characters think. Interpretation should be left to the reader, and reader alone.

NaCl(climbs down from the soapbox )H2O +<img class=' />

edit: eliminated the stupid mo smiley
This message last edited by NaClH2O on 09/09/2009 at 05:29:11 PM
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1287 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 762 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 811 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 708 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 704 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 765 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 747 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 707 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 678 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 740 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 865 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 708 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 683 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 647 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 717 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 646 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 607 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 696 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 836 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 774 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 696 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 690 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 705 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 658 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 639 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1152 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 720 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 679 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 632 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 680 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 643 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 747 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 718 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 689 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 664 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 667 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 633 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 708 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 760 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 745 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 677 Views

Reply to Message