Active Users:2232 Time:08/05/2026 04:36:48 AM
No, He's giving me way more than I want. NaClH2O Send a noteboard - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM
I understand how omniscient voice works. What I DON'T want from that writing voice is editorializing. I have no need of and don't want to know how the narrator feels about anyone's thoughts. All I want is the pure thought. This is along the same lines as learning that the narrator thinks that a particular thought from say Elayne is slutty, or one from Nynaeve is timid or whatever. Bad bad writing. An omniscient narrator should do ONLY narration, no commenting, editorializing or any other 3rd party stuff. I really don't care and really really really don't want to know what the narrator thinks, only what the characters think. Interpretation should be left to the reader, and reader alone.

NaCl(climbs down from the soapbox )H2O +<img class=' />

edit: eliminated the stupid mo smiley
This message last edited by NaClH2O on 09/09/2009 at 05:29:11 PM
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1515 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 979 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 1004 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 915 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 936 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 994 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 955 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 908 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 873 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 973 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 1129 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 919 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 927 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 846 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 930 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 857 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 829 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 903 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 1072 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 975 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 920 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 903 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 921 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 900 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 874 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1417 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 951 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 908 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 883 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 895 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 835 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 943 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 963 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 902 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 855 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 846 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 827 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 935 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 986 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 948 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 879 Views

Reply to Message