Active Users:657 Time:22/03/2026 05:41:39 PM
No, He's giving me way more than I want. NaClH2O Send a noteboard - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM
I understand how omniscient voice works. What I DON'T want from that writing voice is editorializing. I have no need of and don't want to know how the narrator feels about anyone's thoughts. All I want is the pure thought. This is along the same lines as learning that the narrator thinks that a particular thought from say Elayne is slutty, or one from Nynaeve is timid or whatever. Bad bad writing. An omniscient narrator should do ONLY narration, no commenting, editorializing or any other 3rd party stuff. I really don't care and really really really don't want to know what the narrator thinks, only what the characters think. Interpretation should be left to the reader, and reader alone.

NaCl(climbs down from the soapbox )H2O +<img class=' />

edit: eliminated the stupid mo smiley
This message last edited by NaClH2O on 09/09/2009 at 05:29:11 PM
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1476 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 946 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 967 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 878 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 902 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 962 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 917 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 870 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 838 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 937 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 1094 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 885 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 884 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 810 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 894 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 822 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 790 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 867 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 1039 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 939 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 879 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 863 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 884 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 859 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 833 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1376 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 912 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 858 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 840 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 860 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 797 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 905 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 928 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 870 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 813 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 808 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 790 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 895 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 952 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 911 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 847 Views

Reply to Message