Active Users:349 Time:02/05/2025 06:21:32 AM
No, He's giving me way more than I want. NaClH2O Send a noteboard - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM
I understand how omniscient voice works. What I DON'T want from that writing voice is editorializing. I have no need of and don't want to know how the narrator feels about anyone's thoughts. All I want is the pure thought. This is along the same lines as learning that the narrator thinks that a particular thought from say Elayne is slutty, or one from Nynaeve is timid or whatever. Bad bad writing. An omniscient narrator should do ONLY narration, no commenting, editorializing or any other 3rd party stuff. I really don't care and really really really don't want to know what the narrator thinks, only what the characters think. Interpretation should be left to the reader, and reader alone.

NaCl(climbs down from the soapbox )H2O +<img class=' />

edit: eliminated the stupid mo smiley
This message last edited by NaClH2O on 09/09/2009 at 05:29:11 PM
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1265 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 743 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 779 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 690 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 687 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 748 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 730 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 692 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 663 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 720 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 825 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 696 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 665 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 626 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 703 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 627 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 593 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 679 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 817 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 752 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 679 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 674 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 689 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 639 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 622 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1132 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 709 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 660 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 612 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 660 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 623 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 727 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 698 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 668 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 642 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 650 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 612 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 690 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 740 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 727 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 656 Views

Reply to Message