Active Users:557 Time:10/11/2026 12:08:32 AM
No, He's giving me way more than I want. NaClH2O Send a noteboard - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM
I understand how omniscient voice works. What I DON'T want from that writing voice is editorializing. I have no need of and don't want to know how the narrator feels about anyone's thoughts. All I want is the pure thought. This is along the same lines as learning that the narrator thinks that a particular thought from say Elayne is slutty, or one from Nynaeve is timid or whatever. Bad bad writing. An omniscient narrator should do ONLY narration, no commenting, editorializing or any other 3rd party stuff. I really don't care and really really really don't want to know what the narrator thinks, only what the characters think. Interpretation should be left to the reader, and reader alone.

NaCl(climbs down from the soapbox )H2O +<img class=' />

edit: eliminated the stupid mo smiley
This message last edited by NaClH2O on 09/09/2009 at 05:29:11 PM
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1685 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 1141 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 1132 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 1060 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 1098 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 1134 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 1113 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 1027 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 1027 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 1123 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 1283 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 1107 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 1097 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 1010 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 1049 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 980 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 970 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 1037 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 1226 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 1146 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 1072 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 1047 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 1077 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 1049 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 1024 Views
I'd favor it being Justice, they probably tell us in the prologue - 09/09/2009 05:46:37 PM 1069 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1634 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 1088 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 1049 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 1035 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 1057 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 957 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 1090 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 1102 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 1075 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 1022 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 992 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 978 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 1062 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 1138 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 1070 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 1027 Views

Reply to Message