It's my interpretation that the "centuries old" part refers to both sword and scabbard. AFAIC, the wording is ambiguous enough to mean either one, the other or both.
If the sword is mentioned in the prologue we've got merely another 8 days, otherwise let the theory writing begin!
NaCl(do you think it will be as big as Asmo?)H2O
' />
If the sword is mentioned in the prologue we've got merely another 8 days, otherwise let the theory writing begin!
NaCl(do you think it will be as big as Asmo?)H2O
' />
Plot relevance of the sword
- 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM
1418 Views
Great
- 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM
913 Views
Re: Great
- 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM
813 Views
Re: Great
- 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM
822 Views
Re: Great
- 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM
1039 Views
I see that differently
- 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM
837 Views
Re: I see that differently
- 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM
750 Views
Nice
- 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM
810 Views
Re: Nice
- 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM
826 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this
- 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM
782 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this
- 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM
780 Views
I'd favor it being Justice, they probably tell us in the prologue
- 09/09/2009 05:46:37 PM
785 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak
- 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM
1306 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers
- 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM
857 Views
see above for part
- 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM
808 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it
- 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM
781 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it
- 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM
818 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want.
- 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM
737 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons?
- 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM
816 Views
Not sure
- 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM
763 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak
- 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM
826 Views

