It's my interpretation that the "centuries old" part refers to both sword and scabbard. AFAIC, the wording is ambiguous enough to mean either one, the other or both.
If the sword is mentioned in the prologue we've got merely another 8 days, otherwise let the theory writing begin!
NaCl(do you think it will be as big as Asmo?)H2O
' />
If the sword is mentioned in the prologue we've got merely another 8 days, otherwise let the theory writing begin!
NaCl(do you think it will be as big as Asmo?)H2O
' />
Plot relevance of the sword
- 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM
1596 Views
Great
- 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM
1078 Views
Re: Great
- 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM
991 Views
Re: Great
- 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM
1019 Views
Re: Great
- 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM
1198 Views
I see that differently
- 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM
1012 Views
Re: I see that differently
- 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM
925 Views
Nice
- 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM
979 Views
Re: Nice
- 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM
999 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this
- 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM
984 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this
- 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM
960 Views
I'd favor it being Justice, they probably tell us in the prologue
- 09/09/2009 05:46:37 PM
980 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak
- 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM
1513 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers
- 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM
1016 Views
see above for part
- 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM
974 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it
- 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM
956 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it
- 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM
975 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want.
- 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM
898 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons?
- 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM
991 Views
Not sure
- 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM
939 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak
- 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM
1001 Views

