It's my interpretation that the "centuries old" part refers to both sword and scabbard. AFAIC, the wording is ambiguous enough to mean either one, the other or both.
If the sword is mentioned in the prologue we've got merely another 8 days, otherwise let the theory writing begin!
NaCl(do you think it will be as big as Asmo?)H2O
' />
If the sword is mentioned in the prologue we've got merely another 8 days, otherwise let the theory writing begin!
NaCl(do you think it will be as big as Asmo?)H2O
' />
Plot relevance of the sword
- 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM
1547 Views
Great
- 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM
1034 Views
Re: Great
- 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM
948 Views
Re: Great
- 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM
973 Views
Re: Great
- 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM
1156 Views
I see that differently
- 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM
966 Views
Re: I see that differently
- 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM
880 Views
Nice
- 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM
934 Views
Re: Nice
- 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM
954 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this
- 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM
935 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this
- 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM
915 Views
I'd favor it being Justice, they probably tell us in the prologue
- 09/09/2009 05:46:37 PM
927 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak
- 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM
1453 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers
- 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM
977 Views
see above for part
- 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM
943 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it
- 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM
915 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it
- 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM
928 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want.
- 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM
860 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons?
- 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM
941 Views
Not sure
- 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM
894 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak
- 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM
963 Views

