It's my interpretation that the "centuries old" part refers to both sword and scabbard. AFAIC, the wording is ambiguous enough to mean either one, the other or both.
If the sword is mentioned in the prologue we've got merely another 8 days, otherwise let the theory writing begin!
NaCl(do you think it will be as big as Asmo?)H2O
' />
If the sword is mentioned in the prologue we've got merely another 8 days, otherwise let the theory writing begin!
NaCl(do you think it will be as big as Asmo?)H2O
' />
Plot relevance of the sword
- 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM
1517 Views
Great
- 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM
1004 Views
Re: Great
- 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM
916 Views
Re: Great
- 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM
937 Views
Re: Great
- 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM
1130 Views
I see that differently
- 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM
928 Views
Re: I see that differently
- 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM
849 Views
Nice
- 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM
904 Views
Re: Nice
- 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM
921 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this
- 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM
901 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this
- 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM
875 Views
I'd favor it being Justice, they probably tell us in the prologue
- 09/09/2009 05:46:37 PM
892 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak
- 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM
1417 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers
- 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM
951 Views
see above for part
- 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM
910 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it
- 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM
883 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it
- 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM
896 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want.
- 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM
836 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons?
- 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM
905 Views
Not sure
- 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM
856 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak
- 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM
936 Views

