An omniscient narrator should do ONLY narration, no commenting, editorializing or any other 3rd party stuff.
Technically, the narrator isn't omniscient in each individual scene - while throughout the book, we can see into everyone's thoughts, each scene is written in third-person limited. I see why you'd have a problem with the writing, though and I agree that it'd be a case of bad writing, but only in the sense that it confuses the reader. I can't believe that this wouldn't be from Rand's POV; I can't imagine any competent writer would use that kind of commentary unless it's specifically in the style of the novel to do so, and BS is definitely more competent than that.
Plot relevance of the sword
- 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM
1446 Views
Great
- 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM
945 Views
Re: Great
- 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM
853 Views
Re: Great
- 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM
865 Views
Re: Great
- 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM
1063 Views
I see that differently
- 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM
859 Views
Re: I see that differently
- 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM
785 Views
Nice
- 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM
837 Views
Re: Nice
- 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM
859 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this
- 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM
830 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this
- 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM
809 Views
I'd favor it being Justice, they probably tell us in the prologue
- 09/09/2009 05:46:37 PM
817 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak
- 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM
1343 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers
- 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM
881 Views
see above for part
- 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM
832 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it
- 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM
813 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it
- 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM
836 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want.
- 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM
773 Views
But is it...?
- 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM
883 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons?
- 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM
844 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak
- 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM
860 Views

