An omniscient narrator should do ONLY narration, no commenting, editorializing or any other 3rd party stuff.
Technically, the narrator isn't omniscient in each individual scene - while throughout the book, we can see into everyone's thoughts, each scene is written in third-person limited. I see why you'd have a problem with the writing, though and I agree that it'd be a case of bad writing, but only in the sense that it confuses the reader. I can't believe that this wouldn't be from Rand's POV; I can't imagine any competent writer would use that kind of commentary unless it's specifically in the style of the novel to do so, and BS is definitely more competent than that.
Plot relevance of the sword
- 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM
1596 Views
Great
- 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM
1078 Views
Re: Great
- 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM
989 Views
Re: Great
- 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM
1018 Views
Re: Great
- 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM
1198 Views
I see that differently
- 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM
1012 Views
Re: I see that differently
- 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM
925 Views
Nice
- 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM
979 Views
Re: Nice
- 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM
999 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this
- 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM
983 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this
- 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM
960 Views
I'd favor it being Justice, they probably tell us in the prologue
- 09/09/2009 05:46:37 PM
980 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak
- 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM
1512 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers
- 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM
1016 Views
see above for part
- 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM
974 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it
- 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM
955 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it
- 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM
974 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want.
- 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM
898 Views
But is it...?
- 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM
1020 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons?
- 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM
991 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak
- 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM
1001 Views

