Active Users:915 Time:09/08/2026 10:37:35 PM
But is it...? Digital_Eon Send a noteboard - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM
An omniscient narrator should do ONLY narration, no commenting, editorializing or any other 3rd party stuff.


Technically, the narrator isn't omniscient in each individual scene - while throughout the book, we can see into everyone's thoughts, each scene is written in third-person limited. I see why you'd have a problem with the writing, though and I agree that it'd be a case of bad writing, but only in the sense that it confuses the reader. I can't believe that this wouldn't be from Rand's POV; I can't imagine any competent writer would use that kind of commentary unless it's specifically in the style of the novel to do so, and BS is definitely more competent than that.
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1596 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 1061 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 1078 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 989 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 1018 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 1069 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 1037 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 970 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 958 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 1054 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 1198 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 1003 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 1012 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 925 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 988 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 921 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 894 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 972 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 1151 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 1063 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 998 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 979 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 999 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 983 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 960 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1512 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 1016 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 974 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 955 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 974 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 898 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 1020 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 1041 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 991 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 938 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 926 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 904 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 1001 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 1066 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 1004 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 951 Views

Reply to Message