Active Users:1576 Time:24/09/2026 10:05:51 AM
Well the point of the original poster NaClH2O Send a noteboard - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM
Technically, the narrator isn't omniscient in each individual scene - while throughout the book, we can see into everyone's thoughts, each scene is written in third-person limited. I see why you'd have a problem with the writing, though and I agree that it'd be a case of bad writing, but only in the sense that it confuses the reader. I can't believe that this wouldn't be from Rand's POV; I can't imagine any competent writer would use that kind of commentary unless it's specifically in the style of the novel to do so, and BS is definitely more competent than that.

Unfortunately that was the original point. Basically scalius is trying to say that the sword is Turak's ... ok, it fits a lot of the criteria, but why the "And not, oddly, from Lews Therin’s memories—but Rand’s own." There is no way LTT would recognise Turak's sword. Scalius's point was that maybe the "oddly" was from the narrator. ie. the narrator himself thought it odd, not Rand. Therefor NOT from Rand's POV but the narrator's. That's what I'm objecting to.

NaCl(3rd person ltd should stay that way)H2O +<img class=' />
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1627 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 1094 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 1099 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 1013 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 1045 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 1090 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 1063 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 989 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 981 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 1080 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 1233 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 1034 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 1041 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 958 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 1014 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 945 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 923 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 996 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 1182 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 1098 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 1024 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 1003 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 1033 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 1007 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 983 Views
I'd favor it being Justice, they probably tell us in the prologue - 09/09/2009 05:46:37 PM 1010 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1548 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 1038 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 998 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 983 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 1001 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 917 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 1045 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 1064 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 1020 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 971 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 954 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 931 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 1022 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 1094 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 1034 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 977 Views

Reply to Message