Active Users:661 Time:22/03/2026 05:38:15 PM
Well the point of the original poster NaClH2O Send a noteboard - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM
Technically, the narrator isn't omniscient in each individual scene - while throughout the book, we can see into everyone's thoughts, each scene is written in third-person limited. I see why you'd have a problem with the writing, though and I agree that it'd be a case of bad writing, but only in the sense that it confuses the reader. I can't believe that this wouldn't be from Rand's POV; I can't imagine any competent writer would use that kind of commentary unless it's specifically in the style of the novel to do so, and BS is definitely more competent than that.

Unfortunately that was the original point. Basically scalius is trying to say that the sword is Turak's ... ok, it fits a lot of the criteria, but why the "And not, oddly, from Lews Therin’s memories—but Rand’s own." There is no way LTT would recognise Turak's sword. Scalius's point was that maybe the "oddly" was from the narrator. ie. the narrator himself thought it odd, not Rand. Therefor NOT from Rand's POV but the narrator's. That's what I'm objecting to.

NaCl(3rd person ltd should stay that way)H2O +<img class=' />
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1475 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 946 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 967 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 878 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 901 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 961 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 917 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 870 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 838 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 936 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 1093 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 884 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 884 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 810 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 892 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 821 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 789 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 867 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 1038 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 939 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 879 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 863 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 883 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 858 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 832 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1375 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 911 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 858 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 840 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 859 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 794 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 905 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 928 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 870 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 811 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 808 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 789 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 895 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 952 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 911 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 846 Views

Reply to Message