Active Users:2254 Time:08/05/2026 04:37:30 AM
Well the point of the original poster NaClH2O Send a noteboard - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM
Technically, the narrator isn't omniscient in each individual scene - while throughout the book, we can see into everyone's thoughts, each scene is written in third-person limited. I see why you'd have a problem with the writing, though and I agree that it'd be a case of bad writing, but only in the sense that it confuses the reader. I can't believe that this wouldn't be from Rand's POV; I can't imagine any competent writer would use that kind of commentary unless it's specifically in the style of the novel to do so, and BS is definitely more competent than that.

Unfortunately that was the original point. Basically scalius is trying to say that the sword is Turak's ... ok, it fits a lot of the criteria, but why the "And not, oddly, from Lews Therin’s memories—but Rand’s own." There is no way LTT would recognise Turak's sword. Scalius's point was that maybe the "oddly" was from the narrator. ie. the narrator himself thought it odd, not Rand. Therefor NOT from Rand's POV but the narrator's. That's what I'm objecting to.

NaCl(3rd person ltd should stay that way)H2O +<img class=' />
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1515 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 979 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 1004 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 915 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 936 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 995 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 955 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 908 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 873 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 973 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 1129 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 919 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 928 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 846 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 930 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 858 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 829 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 903 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 1072 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 975 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 920 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 904 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 921 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 900 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 875 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1417 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 951 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 908 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 883 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 895 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 835 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 943 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 964 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 902 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 855 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 847 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 827 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 935 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 986 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 948 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 879 Views

Reply to Message