Active Users:766 Time:22/03/2026 07:20:57 PM
Well the point of the original poster NaClH2O Send a noteboard - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM
Technically, the narrator isn't omniscient in each individual scene - while throughout the book, we can see into everyone's thoughts, each scene is written in third-person limited. I see why you'd have a problem with the writing, though and I agree that it'd be a case of bad writing, but only in the sense that it confuses the reader. I can't believe that this wouldn't be from Rand's POV; I can't imagine any competent writer would use that kind of commentary unless it's specifically in the style of the novel to do so, and BS is definitely more competent than that.

Unfortunately that was the original point. Basically scalius is trying to say that the sword is Turak's ... ok, it fits a lot of the criteria, but why the "And not, oddly, from Lews Therin’s memories—but Rand’s own." There is no way LTT would recognise Turak's sword. Scalius's point was that maybe the "oddly" was from the narrator. ie. the narrator himself thought it odd, not Rand. Therefor NOT from Rand's POV but the narrator's. That's what I'm objecting to.

NaCl(3rd person ltd should stay that way)H2O +<img class=' />
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1478 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 946 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 967 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 880 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 905 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 963 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 920 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 872 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 838 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 940 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 1094 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 885 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 885 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 812 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 894 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 822 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 793 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 867 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 1039 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 939 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 881 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 864 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 886 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 859 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 834 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1377 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 912 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 859 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 842 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 860 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 797 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 907 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 929 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 870 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 815 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 809 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 793 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 897 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 952 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 913 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 848 Views

Reply to Message