Active Users:698 Time:24/06/2026 08:58:20 PM
Well the point of the original poster NaClH2O Send a noteboard - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM
Technically, the narrator isn't omniscient in each individual scene - while throughout the book, we can see into everyone's thoughts, each scene is written in third-person limited. I see why you'd have a problem with the writing, though and I agree that it'd be a case of bad writing, but only in the sense that it confuses the reader. I can't believe that this wouldn't be from Rand's POV; I can't imagine any competent writer would use that kind of commentary unless it's specifically in the style of the novel to do so, and BS is definitely more competent than that.

Unfortunately that was the original point. Basically scalius is trying to say that the sword is Turak's ... ok, it fits a lot of the criteria, but why the "And not, oddly, from Lews Therin’s memories—but Rand’s own." There is no way LTT would recognise Turak's sword. Scalius's point was that maybe the "oddly" was from the narrator. ie. the narrator himself thought it odd, not Rand. Therefor NOT from Rand's POV but the narrator's. That's what I'm objecting to.

NaCl(3rd person ltd should stay that way)H2O +<img class=' />
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1545 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 1007 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 1034 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 946 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 969 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 1023 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 988 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 935 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 907 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 1006 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 1156 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 958 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 963 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 877 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 950 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 887 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 855 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 934 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 1104 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 1010 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 951 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 931 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 952 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 935 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 914 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1451 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 974 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 941 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 911 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 927 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 856 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 973 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 998 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 941 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 892 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 879 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 859 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 961 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 1020 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 970 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 908 Views

Reply to Message