Active Users:734 Time:05/08/2025 11:39:25 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
the other reason NaClH2O Send a noteboard - 13/09/2009 03:24:24 PM
Agree. Part of the reason ishy is naeblis.

Is that Ishy is Shaitan's "fancy pants boy". After all Ishy failed badly on two separate instances. One he failed to prevent (or even try to prevent) the use of the Bowl of Winds. That was a Major setback for the Dark. The other failure is of course the Cleansing. We always hear (and in some instances see) that the Shadow is very intolerant of failure. Yet Ishy has gotten off scot free on these two massive blunders.

NaCl(the only conclusion is that Ishy is "teachers pet" )H2O +<img class=' />
Reply to message
The top 6 Forsaken - similar in the One Power Sidious - 12/09/2009 09:27:20 PM 1777 Views
Some thoughts about Semmy Lordling - 12/09/2009 09:59:50 PM 965 Views
Re: Some thoughts about Semmy Sidious - 13/09/2009 08:33:28 AM 1015 Views
Of course... Digital_Eon - 13/09/2009 08:36:39 AM 823 Views
I've been thinking the same for years Dragonsworn - 12/09/2009 11:25:02 PM 928 Views
The Big White Book says... Yvves - 12/09/2009 11:46:43 PM 996 Views
Not Aginor Sidious - 13/09/2009 08:36:37 AM 1007 Views
Re: Not Aginor NaClH2O - 13/09/2009 03:16:13 PM 895 Views
Re: Not Aginor Sidious - 13/09/2009 05:47:14 PM 945 Views
Fact is, the bwb is untrustworthy Shannow - 13/09/2009 05:54:28 PM 862 Views
We must either use all the quotes from the BWB or none of them Sidious - 13/09/2009 06:07:46 PM 908 Views
Or... Shannow - 13/09/2009 08:41:23 PM 850 Views
Re: Or... Sidious - 14/09/2009 04:46:52 AM 809 Views
But, RJ himself said that the BWB was written from the standpoint of a scholar RugbyPlayingAshaman - 14/09/2009 04:42:59 PM 840 Views
Re: Not Aginor NaClH2O - 13/09/2009 08:17:28 PM 810 Views
It all depends on how you define "powerful" Lanfear - 14/09/2009 02:30:31 AM 931 Views
I agree 101%. *NM* Yvves - 14/09/2009 03:49:51 AM 471 Views
I think power is much more than raw strength Sidious - 14/09/2009 05:00:10 AM 815 Views
I agree for the most part, but disagree on one thing. Lanfear - 14/09/2009 07:52:10 PM 943 Views
Re: The top 6 Forsaken - similar in the One Power Bulgakov - 12/09/2009 11:48:03 PM 867 Views
the other reason NaClH2O - 13/09/2009 03:24:24 PM 794 Views
So is graendal similar to lanfear then? Shannow - 13/09/2009 05:41:42 PM 797 Views
Graendal could fight Lanfear and win Sidious - 13/09/2009 06:01:57 PM 1336 Views
Graendal herself says... Shannow - 13/09/2009 09:08:46 PM 820 Views
Re: Graendal herself says... Sidious - 14/09/2009 04:48:37 AM 857 Views
Doesn't Graendal have an Angreal now? Rurouni_Kenshin - 17/09/2009 03:29:10 AM 882 Views
Re: Graendal herself says... Lanfear - 15/09/2009 05:36:53 PM 732 Views
Lanfear was more powerful than Graendal, but Cyndane has less power beetnemesis - 13/09/2009 10:19:35 PM 830 Views
Re: So is graendal similar to lanfear then? Watcher - 13/09/2009 06:05:11 PM 954 Views
I agree with this Sidious - 13/09/2009 06:15:24 PM 959 Views
Compulsion=any other deadly weave. Doesn't really change matters beetnemesis - 13/09/2009 10:23:40 PM 827 Views
Excellent point *NM* Shannow - 13/09/2009 10:35:08 PM 479 Views
But it did give her an edge, and against two forsaken. *NM* fionwe1987 - 13/09/2009 11:12:09 PM 452 Views
Hm? When? *NM* beetnemesis - 14/09/2009 09:04:10 PM 379 Views
tPoD, when she compelled Cyndane and Moghedien. *NM* fionwe1987 - 14/09/2009 10:19:23 PM 430 Views
Not at all Sidious - 14/09/2009 04:51:48 AM 881 Views
Using Compulsion on someone doesn't seem mechanically different beetnemesis - 14/09/2009 09:03:41 PM 725 Views
I'm not so sure about that Sidious - 14/09/2009 09:36:45 PM 830 Views
Totally agree Shannow - 14/09/2009 10:26:07 PM 640 Views
I don't agree. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 15/09/2009 04:33:04 PM 944 Views
Re: So is graendal similar to lanfear then? RugbyPlayingAshaman - 14/09/2009 04:34:24 PM 779 Views
But Graendal confronted her... twice! *NM* fionwe1987 - 13/09/2009 07:48:29 PM 404 Views
Apparently only the third time counts *NM* Sidious - 13/09/2009 08:00:37 PM 444 Views
But the third time's supposed to be lucky. So that won't count either. *NM* fionwe1987 - 13/09/2009 11:26:18 PM 465 Views
Really? Shannow - 13/09/2009 08:36:33 PM 793 Views
No falsely... fionwe1987 - 13/09/2009 11:25:40 PM 1009 Views
That's pretty much my opinion in a nutshell Sidious - 14/09/2009 04:56:15 AM 955 Views
And, of course, the male and female OP strength ranks might not even correlate that much RugbyPlayingAshaman - 14/09/2009 04:41:58 PM 758 Views
They correlate on some critical points Sidious - 14/09/2009 06:57:43 PM 913 Views
That's not exactly what I'm referring to. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 15/09/2009 04:36:29 PM 708 Views
But then we are discussing the same thing Sidious - 15/09/2009 06:59:04 PM 854 Views
I think, outside of semantics, our main disagreement doesn't lie amid the higher tiers RugbyPlayingAshaman - 16/09/2009 03:53:09 PM 723 Views
Probably Sidious - 16/09/2009 06:31:27 PM 870 Views
Re: Probably RugbyPlayingAshaman - 16/09/2009 07:19:03 PM 839 Views
Re: Probably Sidious - 16/09/2009 08:59:31 PM 787 Views
Re: Probably RugbyPlayingAshaman - 18/09/2009 07:03:09 PM 1120 Views
Ahh the old debate... fionwe1987 - 17/09/2009 12:42:36 AM 804 Views
Re: Ahh the old debate... Sidious - 17/09/2009 05:26:52 AM 765 Views
I only disagree on one point, I think they are all rather equal in potential, incl. Ishamael RugbyPlayingAshaman - 14/09/2009 04:28:12 PM 814 Views
I do think Ishamel is special Sidious - 14/09/2009 07:04:03 PM 904 Views
He's special the same way any individual is special. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 14/09/2009 11:36:42 PM 854 Views
Re: He's special the same way any individual is special. Sidious - 15/09/2009 08:36:20 AM 829 Views
Re: He's special the same way any individual is special. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 15/09/2009 03:48:34 PM 822 Views
Re: He's special the same way any individual is special. Sidious - 15/09/2009 04:39:39 PM 809 Views
Re: He's special the same way any individual is special. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 15/09/2009 04:53:00 PM 802 Views
Re: He's special the same way any individual is special. Sidious - 15/09/2009 06:47:45 PM 763 Views
The more interesting question is... AgentOrange - 14/09/2009 06:34:11 PM 755 Views
Hmmm Sidious - 14/09/2009 07:04:34 PM 786 Views
I think we'll see Graendal vs. Aran'gar. fionwe1987 - 14/09/2009 07:31:16 PM 855 Views
Ah yes, that makes sense, and would be great! *NM* Sidious - 14/09/2009 07:40:29 PM 666 Views
Yeah. Though I think its no competition. Graendal has got to be better than a walking tree! fionwe1987 - 14/09/2009 07:50:09 PM 751 Views
They do imply that Graendal is a lot more dangerous than she looks beetnemesis - 14/09/2009 09:08:43 PM 778 Views
I've never underestimated Graendal Sidious - 14/09/2009 09:42:49 PM 830 Views
Yeah... her frivolity was always a red flag for me too. fionwe1987 - 14/09/2009 10:18:40 PM 839 Views
To me, she is the most lethal. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 15/09/2009 05:18:10 PM 629 Views
Yup... fionwe1987 - 15/09/2009 06:39:20 PM 678 Views
I still like Lanfear more Sidious - 15/09/2009 06:51:03 PM 778 Views
Bah! She's an idiot! fionwe1987 - 15/09/2009 07:06:06 PM 774 Views
only in love *NM* Sidious - 15/09/2009 07:23:29 PM 739 Views
Graendal did not beat me and Moghedien Lanfear - 15/09/2009 05:59:39 PM 854 Views
Agreed Sidious - 15/09/2009 06:36:48 PM 750 Views
Ummm... how do we know? fionwe1987 - 15/09/2009 06:40:57 PM 875 Views
Re: Ummm... how do we know? Sidious - 15/09/2009 06:56:21 PM 797 Views
Hmmm... fionwe1987 - 15/09/2009 07:07:45 PM 966 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes