Active Users:2584 Time:18/06/2026 02:30:36 PM
Yeah I am malekithe Send a noteboard - 05/12/2010 09:17:48 AM
You were saying that it should have been impossible for her to show the Seanchan the gateway.

"The oath against using the OP as a weapon should have prevented Elaida or any captive Aes Sedai from showing the Seanchan Travelling."


Yeah, it COULD have been an Accepted who saw the Travelling weave. It didnt HAVE to be Elaida (or any Aes Sedai) who knew the weave was going to cause death.

Explain the actions of Perrin's Aes Sedai in ToM. The weave Perrin asked them to do was NOT going to cause any direct deaths, yet they refused saying they could not help.
Reply to message
Elaida, oh no you didn't! - 04/12/2010 06:38:22 AM 2222 Views
The weave will not directly result in death - 04/12/2010 06:54:20 AM 1134 Views
Re: The weave will not directly result in death - 04/12/2010 07:08:50 AM 1019 Views
Wrong for two reasons - 04/12/2010 09:10:03 AM 1195 Views
Only two? Usually he's wrong for eight reasons. *NM* - 04/12/2010 09:47:37 AM 534 Views
Go jump in a lake - 05/12/2010 08:32:18 AM 931 Views
I wanted to be polite and mentioned just the major ones *NM* - 05/12/2010 10:44:25 AM 491 Views
Thank you, Voscaia Sedai *NM* - 04/12/2010 08:51:58 PM 438 Views
Re: Wrong for two reasons - 05/12/2010 08:39:02 AM 939 Views
you're forgetting she was collared. - 05/12/2010 09:01:27 AM 823 Views
Re: you're forgetting she was collared. - 05/12/2010 09:08:30 AM 911 Views
uhm, no that's not all you're saying. - 05/12/2010 09:14:47 AM 922 Views
Yeah I am - 05/12/2010 09:17:48 AM 841 Views
no. dude i gave you a direct quote from your own statement. that is not what you said - 05/12/2010 09:20:14 AM 985 Views
Go dude yourself brother. - 05/12/2010 09:27:33 AM 841 Views
wow i just...wow. - 05/12/2010 09:33:41 AM 928 Views
Re: wow i just...wow. - 05/12/2010 09:45:47 AM 922 Views
yes well you genuinely seem to be having a problem comprehending your own statements. - 05/12/2010 09:51:18 AM 779 Views
Well you genuinely seem to be retarded. - 05/12/2010 09:59:19 AM 842 Views
I judge this based off your own reactions to other's statements - 05/12/2010 10:05:58 AM 949 Views
I judge you based on your own statements towards me - 05/12/2010 10:16:18 AM 871 Views
if all you did was disagree with me, we would not be having this discussion. - 05/12/2010 10:25:36 AM 819 Views
This is why I replied the way I did *NM* - 05/12/2010 10:51:54 AM 403 Views
go read the boooks more closely - 05/12/2010 02:34:11 PM 1244 Views
Plain wrong. The weave doesn't kill in itself. - 04/12/2010 02:34:00 PM 1022 Views
Wrong - 05/12/2010 08:40:40 AM 839 Views
This - 04/12/2010 12:35:04 PM 862 Views
Seconded "This"^ *NM* - 04/12/2010 07:09:17 PM 413 Views
Thirded "This"^ *NM* - 05/12/2010 10:47:56 AM 443 Views
Re: Fourthed "This"^ *NM* - 05/12/2010 08:08:15 PM 411 Views
yep, he was just trolling I guess *NM* - 05/12/2010 01:58:32 PM 414 Views
the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death - 04/12/2010 02:55:13 PM 873 Views
Re: the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death - 05/12/2010 08:43:48 AM 918 Views
just because they didn't want to doesn't mean they weren't able. - 05/12/2010 09:07:08 AM 869 Views
Re: just because they didn't want to doesn't mean they weren't able. - 05/12/2010 09:11:28 AM 901 Views
well that would explain how santa is able to make his rounds in one night! *NM* - 05/12/2010 09:13:43 AM 357 Views
Yup, I guess that was what Elaida was thinking *NM* - 05/12/2010 09:15:21 AM 419 Views
It's actually come up in the books themselves - 04/12/2010 03:00:03 PM 1023 Views
Re: Elaida, oh no you didn't! - 04/12/2010 03:30:57 PM 909 Views
Elaida could teach them balefire and not break the Oaths. *NM* - 04/12/2010 07:24:55 PM 394 Views
Re: Elaida, oh no you didn't! - 05/12/2010 08:32:50 AM 1114 Views
There's another way she could have avoided it - 05/12/2010 11:37:09 AM 814 Views
Re: There's another way she could have avoided it - 05/12/2010 01:51:06 PM 1176 Views
Re: There's another way she could have avoided it - 06/12/2010 01:43:45 PM 800 Views
I disagree - 06/12/2010 02:29:46 PM 889 Views

Reply to Message