You were saying that it should have been impossible for her to show the Seanchan the gateway.
"The oath against using the OP as a weapon should have prevented Elaida or any captive Aes Sedai from showing the Seanchan Travelling."
Yeah, it COULD have been an Accepted who saw the Travelling weave. It didnt HAVE to be Elaida (or any Aes Sedai) who knew the weave was going to cause death.
Explain the actions of Perrin's Aes Sedai in ToM. The weave Perrin asked them to do was NOT going to cause any direct deaths, yet they refused saying they could not help.
Elaida, oh no you didn't!
- 04/12/2010 06:38:22 AM
2273 Views
The weave will not directly result in death
- 04/12/2010 06:54:20 AM
1187 Views
Re: The weave will not directly result in death
- 04/12/2010 07:08:50 AM
1073 Views
Wrong for two reasons
- 04/12/2010 09:10:03 AM
1232 Views
Re: Wrong for two reasons
- 05/12/2010 08:39:02 AM
988 Views
you're forgetting she was collared.
- 05/12/2010 09:01:27 AM
862 Views
Re: you're forgetting she was collared.
- 05/12/2010 09:08:30 AM
951 Views
uhm, no that's not all you're saying.
- 05/12/2010 09:14:47 AM
968 Views
Yeah I am
- 05/12/2010 09:17:48 AM
902 Views
no. dude i gave you a direct quote from your own statement. that is not what you said
- 05/12/2010 09:20:14 AM
1031 Views
Go dude yourself brother.
- 05/12/2010 09:27:33 AM
883 Views
wow i just...wow.
- 05/12/2010 09:33:41 AM
974 Views
Re: wow i just...wow.
- 05/12/2010 09:45:47 AM
970 Views
yes well you genuinely seem to be having a problem comprehending your own statements.
- 05/12/2010 09:51:18 AM
820 Views
Well you genuinely seem to be retarded.
- 05/12/2010 09:59:19 AM
887 Views
I judge this based off your own reactions to other's statements
- 05/12/2010 10:05:58 AM
991 Views
I judge you based on your own statements towards me
- 05/12/2010 10:16:18 AM
914 Views
if all you did was disagree with me, we would not be having this discussion.
- 05/12/2010 10:25:36 AM
867 Views
Seconded "This"^ *NM*
- 04/12/2010 07:09:17 PM
435 Views
the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death
- 04/12/2010 02:55:13 PM
912 Views
Re: the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death
- 05/12/2010 08:43:48 AM
979 Views
just because they didn't want to doesn't mean they weren't able.
- 05/12/2010 09:07:08 AM
917 Views
Re: just because they didn't want to doesn't mean they weren't able.
- 05/12/2010 09:11:28 AM
950 Views
well that would explain how santa is able to make his rounds in one night! *NM*
- 05/12/2010 09:13:42 AM
423 Views
well that would explain how santa is able to make his rounds in one night! *NM*
- 05/12/2010 09:13:43 AM
379 Views
Re: the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death
- 06/12/2010 03:44:33 PM
876 Views
This is ridiculous. You can teach any weave, including Balefire. You just can't always use it. *NM*
- 05/12/2010 06:37:16 AM
385 Views
You can teach a weave so long as YOU believe that the weave won't be a weapon. Elaida knows better *NM*
- 05/12/2010 09:13:57 AM
425 Views
This is false, we've seen battle weaves taught since the start of the series.
- 05/12/2010 01:49:13 PM
857 Views
Right? and every AS seems to know how to make a fireball and call lightning
- 05/12/2010 02:44:45 PM
848 Views
There's another way she could have avoided it
- 05/12/2010 11:37:09 AM
867 Views
Re: There's another way she could have avoided it
- 05/12/2010 01:51:06 PM
1214 Views

*NM*
*NM*