no. dude i gave you a direct quote from your own statement. that is not what you said
LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 05/12/2010 09:20:14 AM
your opening statement was, again "The oath against using the OP as a weapon should have prevented Elaida or any captive Aes Sedai from showing the Seanchan Travelling."
If what you meant was "oh why did it have to be Elaida" that is not what that statement means.
It means you think that she should not have been able to do so. Even if you ALSO think that we should have seen some other person do it, that is PLAINLY not all you meant. And THIS is what is being discussed.
Do you have some sort of reading comprehension disability??
Oh and as far as Perrin's Aes Sedai, they probably believed what they said. Maybe THEY couldn't have. However that does not mean that ALL Aes Sedai could not have. Aes Sedai effectively lie all the time, without literally lying. Another Aes Sedai who did NOT believe as they did, could have cast the Gateway. Egwene DID. Right there is proof that it COULD be done. plain and simple. It's like you're trying to argue that water balloons can't break because all the ones you threw didn't. Okay well I just threw one and it broke. Obviously water balloons can break. Yours just didn't.
If what you meant was "oh why did it have to be Elaida" that is not what that statement means.
It means you think that she should not have been able to do so. Even if you ALSO think that we should have seen some other person do it, that is PLAINLY not all you meant. And THIS is what is being discussed.
Do you have some sort of reading comprehension disability??
Oh and as far as Perrin's Aes Sedai, they probably believed what they said. Maybe THEY couldn't have. However that does not mean that ALL Aes Sedai could not have. Aes Sedai effectively lie all the time, without literally lying. Another Aes Sedai who did NOT believe as they did, could have cast the Gateway. Egwene DID. Right there is proof that it COULD be done. plain and simple. It's like you're trying to argue that water balloons can't break because all the ones you threw didn't. Okay well I just threw one and it broke. Obviously water balloons can break. Yours just didn't.
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
This message last edited by LadyLorraine on 05/12/2010 at 09:28:05 AM
Elaida, oh no you didn't!
- 04/12/2010 06:38:22 AM
2050 Views
The weave will not directly result in death
- 04/12/2010 06:54:20 AM
951 Views
Re: The weave will not directly result in death
- 04/12/2010 07:08:50 AM
871 Views
Wrong for two reasons
- 04/12/2010 09:10:03 AM
1028 Views
Re: Wrong for two reasons
- 05/12/2010 08:39:02 AM
774 Views
you're forgetting she was collared.
- 05/12/2010 09:01:27 AM
661 Views
Re: you're forgetting she was collared.
- 05/12/2010 09:08:30 AM
755 Views
uhm, no that's not all you're saying.
- 05/12/2010 09:14:47 AM
762 Views
Yeah I am
- 05/12/2010 09:17:48 AM
694 Views
no. dude i gave you a direct quote from your own statement. that is not what you said
- 05/12/2010 09:20:14 AM
824 Views
Go dude yourself brother.
- 05/12/2010 09:27:33 AM
687 Views
wow i just...wow.
- 05/12/2010 09:33:41 AM
778 Views
Re: wow i just...wow.
- 05/12/2010 09:45:47 AM
755 Views
yes well you genuinely seem to be having a problem comprehending your own statements.
- 05/12/2010 09:51:18 AM
634 Views
Well you genuinely seem to be retarded.
- 05/12/2010 09:59:19 AM
688 Views
I judge this based off your own reactions to other's statements
- 05/12/2010 10:05:58 AM
797 Views
I judge you based on your own statements towards me
- 05/12/2010 10:16:18 AM
717 Views
if all you did was disagree with me, we would not be having this discussion.
- 05/12/2010 10:25:36 AM
630 Views
*NM*
Seconded "This"^ *NM*
- 04/12/2010 07:09:17 PM
328 Views
the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death
- 04/12/2010 02:55:13 PM
687 Views
Re: the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death
- 05/12/2010 08:43:48 AM
751 Views
just because they didn't want to doesn't mean they weren't able.
- 05/12/2010 09:07:08 AM
719 Views
Re: just because they didn't want to doesn't mean they weren't able.
- 05/12/2010 09:11:28 AM
739 Views
well that would explain how santa is able to make his rounds in one night! *NM*
- 05/12/2010 09:13:42 AM
331 Views
well that would explain how santa is able to make his rounds in one night! *NM*
- 05/12/2010 09:13:43 AM
271 Views
*NM*
Re: the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death
- 06/12/2010 03:44:33 PM
679 Views
This is ridiculous. You can teach any weave, including Balefire. You just can't always use it. *NM*
- 05/12/2010 06:37:16 AM
290 Views
You can teach a weave so long as YOU believe that the weave won't be a weapon. Elaida knows better *NM*
- 05/12/2010 09:13:57 AM
336 Views
This is false, we've seen battle weaves taught since the start of the series.
- 05/12/2010 01:49:13 PM
658 Views
Right? and every AS seems to know how to make a fireball and call lightning
- 05/12/2010 02:44:45 PM
651 Views
There's another way she could have avoided it
- 05/12/2010 11:37:09 AM
661 Views
Re: There's another way she could have avoided it
- 05/12/2010 01:51:06 PM
1031 Views