Active Users:1389 Time:04/05/2026 09:33:44 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Go dude yourself brother. malekithe Send a noteboard - 05/12/2010 09:27:33 AM
your opening statement was, again "The oath against using the OP as a weapon should have prevented Elaida or any captive Aes Sedai from showing the Seanchan Travelling."

If what you meant was "oh why did it have to be Elaida" that is not what that statement means.

It means you think that she should not have been able to do so.

Do you have some sort of reading comprehension disability??


Maybe you have a reading disability bitch.

"It just shouldnt have been an Aes Sedai to do it."

Not an Aes Sedai, meaning not Elaida - an Aes Sedai.

Don't flame me because you disagree, I will gladly flame you back. Just disagree.
Reply to message
Elaida, oh no you didn't! malekithe - 04/12/2010 06:38:22 AM 2204 Views
The weave will not directly result in death Helene - 04/12/2010 06:54:20 AM 1116 Views
Re: The weave will not directly result in death malekithe - 04/12/2010 07:08:50 AM 1005 Views
Wrong for two reasons Voscaia Sedai - 04/12/2010 09:10:03 AM 1179 Views
Only two? Usually he's wrong for eight reasons. *NM* Deadsy - 04/12/2010 09:47:37 AM 523 Views
Go jump in a lake malekithe - 05/12/2010 08:32:18 AM 909 Views
I wanted to be polite and mentioned just the major ones *NM* Voscaia Sedai - 05/12/2010 10:44:25 AM 480 Views
Thank you, Voscaia Sedai *NM* Evil_Monkey - 04/12/2010 08:51:58 PM 428 Views
Re: Wrong for two reasons malekithe - 05/12/2010 08:39:02 AM 920 Views
you're forgetting she was collared. LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:01:27 AM 801 Views
Re: you're forgetting she was collared. malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:08:30 AM 895 Views
uhm, no that's not all you're saying. LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:14:47 AM 898 Views
Yeah I am malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:17:48 AM 819 Views
no. dude i gave you a direct quote from your own statement. that is not what you said LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:20:14 AM 965 Views
Go dude yourself brother. malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:27:33 AM 817 Views
wow i just...wow. LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:33:41 AM 909 Views
Re: wow i just...wow. malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:45:47 AM 901 Views
yes well you genuinely seem to be having a problem comprehending your own statements. LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:51:18 AM 757 Views
Well you genuinely seem to be retarded. malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:59:19 AM 827 Views
I judge this based off your own reactions to other's statements LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 10:05:58 AM 932 Views
I judge you based on your own statements towards me malekithe - 05/12/2010 10:16:18 AM 858 Views
if all you did was disagree with me, we would not be having this discussion. LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 10:25:36 AM 799 Views
This is why I replied the way I did *NM* Deadsy - 05/12/2010 10:51:54 AM 390 Views
go read the boooks more closely darius_sedai - 05/12/2010 02:34:11 PM 1222 Views
Plain wrong. The weave doesn't kill in itself. Ashaman_Luc - 04/12/2010 02:34:00 PM 1001 Views
Wrong malekithe - 05/12/2010 08:40:40 AM 821 Views
This redqueen - 04/12/2010 12:35:04 PM 839 Views
Seconded "This"^ *NM* LadyLorraine - 04/12/2010 07:09:17 PM 401 Views
Thirded "This"^ *NM* Voscaia Sedai - 05/12/2010 10:47:56 AM 432 Views
Re: Fourthed "This"^ *NM* alanna aes sedai - 05/12/2010 08:08:15 PM 400 Views
yep, he was just trolling I guess *NM* Lo'oris - 05/12/2010 01:58:32 PM 401 Views
the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death Ava - 04/12/2010 02:55:13 PM 854 Views
Re: the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death malekithe - 05/12/2010 08:43:48 AM 898 Views
just because they didn't want to doesn't mean they weren't able. LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:07:08 AM 848 Views
Re: just because they didn't want to doesn't mean they weren't able. malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:11:28 AM 881 Views
well that would explain how santa is able to make his rounds in one night! *NM* LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:13:42 AM 395 Views
well that would explain how santa is able to make his rounds in one night! *NM* LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:13:43 AM 347 Views
Yup, I guess that was what Elaida was thinking *NM* malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:15:21 AM 409 Views
Re: the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death HyogaRott - 06/12/2010 03:44:33 PM 807 Views
It's actually come up in the books themselves darius_sedai - 04/12/2010 03:00:03 PM 1003 Views
Re: Elaida, oh no you didn't! Zeratul - 04/12/2010 03:30:57 PM 891 Views
Elaida could teach them balefire and not break the Oaths. *NM* Gher - 04/12/2010 07:24:55 PM 385 Views
This is ridiculous. You can teach any weave, including Balefire. You just can't always use it. *NM* Marshall - 05/12/2010 06:37:16 AM 352 Views
You can teach a weave so long as YOU believe that the weave won't be a weapon. Elaida knows better *NM* malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:13:57 AM 396 Views
This is false, we've seen battle weaves taught since the start of the series. Lord Haart - 05/12/2010 01:49:13 PM 782 Views
Right? and every AS seems to know how to make a fireball and call lightning darius_sedai - 05/12/2010 02:44:45 PM 787 Views
that's where you are wrong darius_sedai - 05/12/2010 02:43:21 PM 777 Views
Re: Elaida, oh no you didn't! benxtaron - 05/12/2010 08:32:50 AM 1088 Views
There's another way she could have avoided it redqueen - 05/12/2010 11:37:09 AM 799 Views
Re: There's another way she could have avoided it Lord Haart - 05/12/2010 01:51:06 PM 1156 Views
Re: There's another way she could have avoided it Watcher - 06/12/2010 01:43:45 PM 783 Views
I disagree redqueen - 06/12/2010 02:29:46 PM 869 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes