Active Users:572 Time:03/08/2025 08:10:29 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Go dude yourself brother. malekithe Send a noteboard - 05/12/2010 09:27:33 AM
your opening statement was, again "The oath against using the OP as a weapon should have prevented Elaida or any captive Aes Sedai from showing the Seanchan Travelling."

If what you meant was "oh why did it have to be Elaida" that is not what that statement means.

It means you think that she should not have been able to do so.

Do you have some sort of reading comprehension disability??


Maybe you have a reading disability bitch.

"It just shouldnt have been an Aes Sedai to do it."

Not an Aes Sedai, meaning not Elaida - an Aes Sedai.

Don't flame me because you disagree, I will gladly flame you back. Just disagree.
Reply to message
Elaida, oh no you didn't! malekithe - 04/12/2010 06:38:22 AM 2066 Views
The weave will not directly result in death Helene - 04/12/2010 06:54:20 AM 970 Views
Re: The weave will not directly result in death malekithe - 04/12/2010 07:08:50 AM 888 Views
Wrong for two reasons Voscaia Sedai - 04/12/2010 09:10:03 AM 1044 Views
Only two? Usually he's wrong for eight reasons. *NM* Deadsy - 04/12/2010 09:47:37 AM 467 Views
Go jump in a lake malekithe - 05/12/2010 08:32:18 AM 770 Views
I wanted to be polite and mentioned just the major ones *NM* Voscaia Sedai - 05/12/2010 10:44:25 AM 426 Views
Thank you, Voscaia Sedai *NM* Evil_Monkey - 04/12/2010 08:51:58 PM 373 Views
Re: Wrong for two reasons malekithe - 05/12/2010 08:39:02 AM 790 Views
you're forgetting she was collared. LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:01:27 AM 677 Views
Re: you're forgetting she was collared. malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:08:30 AM 773 Views
uhm, no that's not all you're saying. LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:14:47 AM 774 Views
Yeah I am malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:17:48 AM 709 Views
no. dude i gave you a direct quote from your own statement. that is not what you said LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:20:14 AM 838 Views
Go dude yourself brother. malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:27:33 AM 703 Views
wow i just...wow. LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:33:41 AM 793 Views
Re: wow i just...wow. malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:45:47 AM 771 Views
yes well you genuinely seem to be having a problem comprehending your own statements. LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:51:18 AM 647 Views
Well you genuinely seem to be retarded. malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:59:19 AM 703 Views
I judge this based off your own reactions to other's statements LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 10:05:58 AM 809 Views
I judge you based on your own statements towards me malekithe - 05/12/2010 10:16:18 AM 729 Views
if all you did was disagree with me, we would not be having this discussion. LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 10:25:36 AM 647 Views
This is why I replied the way I did *NM* Deadsy - 05/12/2010 10:51:54 AM 334 Views
go read the boooks more closely darius_sedai - 05/12/2010 02:34:11 PM 1073 Views
Plain wrong. The weave doesn't kill in itself. Ashaman_Luc - 04/12/2010 02:34:00 PM 864 Views
Wrong malekithe - 05/12/2010 08:40:40 AM 698 Views
This redqueen - 04/12/2010 12:35:04 PM 727 Views
Seconded "This"^ *NM* LadyLorraine - 04/12/2010 07:09:17 PM 335 Views
Thirded "This"^ *NM* Voscaia Sedai - 05/12/2010 10:47:56 AM 382 Views
Re: Fourthed "This"^ *NM* alanna aes sedai - 05/12/2010 08:08:15 PM 338 Views
yep, he was just trolling I guess *NM* Lo'oris - 05/12/2010 01:58:32 PM 335 Views
the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death Ava - 04/12/2010 02:55:13 PM 702 Views
Re: the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death malekithe - 05/12/2010 08:43:48 AM 766 Views
just because they didn't want to doesn't mean they weren't able. LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:07:08 AM 731 Views
Re: just because they didn't want to doesn't mean they weren't able. malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:11:28 AM 755 Views
well that would explain how santa is able to make his rounds in one night! *NM* LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:13:42 AM 340 Views
well that would explain how santa is able to make his rounds in one night! *NM* LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:13:43 AM 279 Views
Yup, I guess that was what Elaida was thinking *NM* malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:15:21 AM 354 Views
Re: the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death HyogaRott - 06/12/2010 03:44:33 PM 699 Views
It's actually come up in the books themselves darius_sedai - 04/12/2010 03:00:03 PM 849 Views
Re: Elaida, oh no you didn't! Zeratul - 04/12/2010 03:30:57 PM 773 Views
Elaida could teach them balefire and not break the Oaths. *NM* Gher - 04/12/2010 07:24:55 PM 324 Views
This is ridiculous. You can teach any weave, including Balefire. You just can't always use it. *NM* Marshall - 05/12/2010 06:37:16 AM 296 Views
You can teach a weave so long as YOU believe that the weave won't be a weapon. Elaida knows better *NM* malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:13:57 AM 342 Views
This is false, we've seen battle weaves taught since the start of the series. Lord Haart - 05/12/2010 01:49:13 PM 673 Views
Right? and every AS seems to know how to make a fireball and call lightning darius_sedai - 05/12/2010 02:44:45 PM 664 Views
that's where you are wrong darius_sedai - 05/12/2010 02:43:21 PM 675 Views
Re: Elaida, oh no you didn't! benxtaron - 05/12/2010 08:32:50 AM 889 Views
There's another way she could have avoided it redqueen - 05/12/2010 11:37:09 AM 675 Views
Re: There's another way she could have avoided it Lord Haart - 05/12/2010 01:51:06 PM 1042 Views
Re: There's another way she could have avoided it Watcher - 06/12/2010 01:43:45 PM 670 Views
I disagree redqueen - 06/12/2010 02:29:46 PM 727 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes