Yes, that is what you said at the end of your post.
but you said "The oath against using the OP as a weapon should have prevented Elaida or any captive Aes Sedai from showing the Seanchan Travelling."
I don't disagree with you that we probably didn't have to have Elaida be the one to do it. We didn't. But your first statements are what is under discussion, not the other ones. The fact that you said that an Aes Sedai should not have been able to show Travelling to the Seanchan is what this sub thread is about.
NO ONE has argued that "Oh we DEFINITELY had to see an Aes Sedai do it, PARTICULARLY Elaida!!"
this statement. this one right here: "The oath against using the OP as a weapon should have prevented Elaida or any captive Aes Sedai from showing the Seanchan Travelling. " is the one that people are arguing with you about.
And you know what, I may have called into question your reading comprehension ability but that's only because you are not showing any. I never stooped to name calling so if you're going to go there, then that certainly says a lot about you, doesn't it?
but you said "The oath against using the OP as a weapon should have prevented Elaida or any captive Aes Sedai from showing the Seanchan Travelling."
I don't disagree with you that we probably didn't have to have Elaida be the one to do it. We didn't. But your first statements are what is under discussion, not the other ones. The fact that you said that an Aes Sedai should not have been able to show Travelling to the Seanchan is what this sub thread is about.
NO ONE has argued that "Oh we DEFINITELY had to see an Aes Sedai do it, PARTICULARLY Elaida!!"
this statement. this one right here: "The oath against using the OP as a weapon should have prevented Elaida or any captive Aes Sedai from showing the Seanchan Travelling. " is the one that people are arguing with you about.
And you know what, I may have called into question your reading comprehension ability but that's only because you are not showing any. I never stooped to name calling so if you're going to go there, then that certainly says a lot about you, doesn't it?
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Elaida, oh no you didn't!
- 04/12/2010 06:38:22 AM
2204 Views
The weave will not directly result in death
- 04/12/2010 06:54:20 AM
1116 Views
Re: The weave will not directly result in death
- 04/12/2010 07:08:50 AM
1005 Views
Wrong for two reasons
- 04/12/2010 09:10:03 AM
1179 Views
Re: Wrong for two reasons
- 05/12/2010 08:39:02 AM
920 Views
you're forgetting she was collared.
- 05/12/2010 09:01:27 AM
801 Views
Re: you're forgetting she was collared.
- 05/12/2010 09:08:30 AM
895 Views
uhm, no that's not all you're saying.
- 05/12/2010 09:14:47 AM
898 Views
Yeah I am
- 05/12/2010 09:17:48 AM
819 Views
no. dude i gave you a direct quote from your own statement. that is not what you said
- 05/12/2010 09:20:14 AM
965 Views
Go dude yourself brother.
- 05/12/2010 09:27:33 AM
817 Views
wow i just...wow.
- 05/12/2010 09:33:41 AM
909 Views
Re: wow i just...wow.
- 05/12/2010 09:45:47 AM
901 Views
yes well you genuinely seem to be having a problem comprehending your own statements.
- 05/12/2010 09:51:18 AM
757 Views
Well you genuinely seem to be retarded.
- 05/12/2010 09:59:19 AM
827 Views
I judge this based off your own reactions to other's statements
- 05/12/2010 10:05:58 AM
932 Views
I judge you based on your own statements towards me
- 05/12/2010 10:16:18 AM
858 Views
if all you did was disagree with me, we would not be having this discussion.
- 05/12/2010 10:25:36 AM
799 Views
*NM*
Seconded "This"^ *NM*
- 04/12/2010 07:09:17 PM
401 Views
the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death
- 04/12/2010 02:55:13 PM
854 Views
Re: the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death
- 05/12/2010 08:43:48 AM
898 Views
just because they didn't want to doesn't mean they weren't able.
- 05/12/2010 09:07:08 AM
848 Views
Re: just because they didn't want to doesn't mean they weren't able.
- 05/12/2010 09:11:28 AM
881 Views
well that would explain how santa is able to make his rounds in one night! *NM*
- 05/12/2010 09:13:42 AM
395 Views
well that would explain how santa is able to make his rounds in one night! *NM*
- 05/12/2010 09:13:43 AM
347 Views
*NM*
Re: the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death
- 06/12/2010 03:44:33 PM
807 Views
This is ridiculous. You can teach any weave, including Balefire. You just can't always use it. *NM*
- 05/12/2010 06:37:16 AM
352 Views
You can teach a weave so long as YOU believe that the weave won't be a weapon. Elaida knows better *NM*
- 05/12/2010 09:13:57 AM
396 Views
This is false, we've seen battle weaves taught since the start of the series.
- 05/12/2010 01:49:13 PM
782 Views
Right? and every AS seems to know how to make a fireball and call lightning
- 05/12/2010 02:44:45 PM
787 Views
There's another way she could have avoided it
- 05/12/2010 11:37:09 AM
799 Views
Re: There's another way she could have avoided it
- 05/12/2010 01:51:06 PM
1156 Views