The oath against using the OP as a weapon should have prevented Elaida or any captive Aes Sedai from showing the Seanchan Travelling.
Elaida KNEW what they would do with Travelling, that they would use it to KILL and there is NO WAY they could have possibly made her believe they were going to use it for benign purposes.
Elaida KNEW what they would do with Travelling, that they would use it to KILL and there is NO WAY they could have possibly made her believe they were going to use it for benign purposes.
And I'm a little surprised Egwene hasn't done something like this in the Tower. All Elaida had to do was, at some point early in her captivity when she understood she wasn't going to escape, that she was going to be broken, to swear an oath to herself not to reveal Travelling (or any other Aes Sedai weave) to her captors.
She's not Black Ajah so the first oath would have made it binding. Even if she was broken and turned into a happy, obedient damane, she couldn't have revealed it.
Even better, she should have opened the gateway and then started yanking threads out of it. With any luck there would have been another Gateway!bomb that would have vaporised every Seanchan within two hundred paces

Elaida, oh no you didn't!
04/12/2010 06:38:22 AM
- 2066 Views
The weave will not directly result in death
04/12/2010 06:54:20 AM
- 970 Views
Re: The weave will not directly result in death
04/12/2010 07:08:50 AM
- 888 Views
Wrong for two reasons
04/12/2010 09:10:03 AM
- 1044 Views
Re: Wrong for two reasons
05/12/2010 08:39:02 AM
- 790 Views
you're forgetting she was collared.
05/12/2010 09:01:27 AM
- 677 Views
Re: you're forgetting she was collared.
05/12/2010 09:08:30 AM
- 773 Views
uhm, no that's not all you're saying.
05/12/2010 09:14:47 AM
- 775 Views
Yeah I am
05/12/2010 09:17:48 AM
- 710 Views
no. dude i gave you a direct quote from your own statement. that is not what you said
05/12/2010 09:20:14 AM
- 838 Views
Go dude yourself brother.
05/12/2010 09:27:33 AM
- 703 Views
wow i just...wow.
05/12/2010 09:33:41 AM
- 793 Views
Re: wow i just...wow.
05/12/2010 09:45:47 AM
- 771 Views
yes well you genuinely seem to be having a problem comprehending your own statements.
05/12/2010 09:51:18 AM
- 648 Views
Well you genuinely seem to be retarded.
05/12/2010 09:59:19 AM
- 704 Views
I judge this based off your own reactions to other's statements
05/12/2010 10:05:58 AM
- 810 Views
I judge you based on your own statements towards me
05/12/2010 10:16:18 AM
- 731 Views
if all you did was disagree with me, we would not be having this discussion.
05/12/2010 10:25:36 AM
- 648 Views
Seconded "This"^ *NM*
04/12/2010 07:09:17 PM
- 335 Views
the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death
04/12/2010 02:55:13 PM
- 703 Views
Re: the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death
05/12/2010 08:43:48 AM
- 766 Views
just because they didn't want to doesn't mean they weren't able.
05/12/2010 09:07:08 AM
- 731 Views
Re: just because they didn't want to doesn't mean they weren't able.
05/12/2010 09:11:28 AM
- 756 Views
well that would explain how santa is able to make his rounds in one night! *NM*
05/12/2010 09:13:42 AM
- 340 Views
well that would explain how santa is able to make his rounds in one night! *NM*
05/12/2010 09:13:43 AM
- 279 Views
Re: the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death
06/12/2010 03:44:33 PM
- 699 Views
This is ridiculous. You can teach any weave, including Balefire. You just can't always use it. *NM*
05/12/2010 06:37:16 AM
- 296 Views
You can teach a weave so long as YOU believe that the weave won't be a weapon. Elaida knows better *NM*
05/12/2010 09:13:57 AM
- 342 Views
This is false, we've seen battle weaves taught since the start of the series.
05/12/2010 01:49:13 PM
- 674 Views
Right? and every AS seems to know how to make a fireball and call lightning
05/12/2010 02:44:45 PM
- 665 Views
There's another way she could have avoided it
05/12/2010 11:37:09 AM
- 677 Views
Re: There's another way she could have avoided it
05/12/2010 01:51:06 PM
- 1043 Views