Active Users:591 Time:01/06/2026 11:50:13 PM
Where would you place Egwene though? fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 14/12/2011 09:13:46 AM
I put her at 70-75% of Lanfear's strength. I guess this may be where we differ.
Reply to message
Underestimating Forsaken strength - 11/12/2011 05:57:22 AM 2180 Views
Ah, my favourite topic makes a return... - 11/12/2011 07:45:29 AM 1070 Views
Re: Ah, my favourite topic makes a return... - 11/12/2011 10:25:03 PM 1086 Views
Yes, you are probably correct - 12/12/2011 06:26:07 AM 1242 Views
Re: and some of the information given to us is flawed - 12/12/2011 07:38:59 PM 1019 Views
The real question is - What percentage of her full strength did Nynaeve achieve by Book 4? - 12/12/2011 08:31:30 PM 1047 Views
I find that unlikely - 12/12/2011 09:28:07 PM 1005 Views
Easy question for you: Based on the evidence, what percentage of her strength was Nynaeve at in tSR? - 13/12/2011 07:09:56 AM 1059 Views
Well.... - 13/12/2011 01:12:48 PM 1062 Views
Well there we have it - 13/12/2011 01:36:45 PM 1069 Views
Re: Well there we have it - 13/12/2011 02:06:14 PM 1091 Views
Re: Well there we have it - 13/12/2011 02:12:10 PM 1038 Views
Alivia may not even be stronger than Nynaeve... - 14/12/2011 03:14:06 AM 1127 Views
That wouldn't surprise me actually *NM* - 14/12/2011 07:46:47 AM 553 Views
Where would you place Egwene though? - 14/12/2011 09:13:46 AM 997 Views
Re: Where would you place Egwene though? - 14/12/2011 12:53:49 PM 1014 Views
Bonfire next to a candle indeed. Hehehe... - 14/12/2011 05:50:34 PM 1168 Views
- 14/12/2011 06:56:40 PM 947 Views
The same "step" you refer to seperates Egwene from normal Aes Sedai according to RJ... - 14/12/2011 07:14:55 PM 1005 Views
Yes! And...? - 15/12/2011 02:53:37 AM 1002 Views
Yes I would agree with that - 14/12/2011 08:24:35 PM 1153 Views
Alivia with an angreal > > > Cyndane - 14/12/2011 08:50:41 PM 941 Views
No - 14/12/2011 09:10:34 PM 1034 Views
That makes no sense. - 14/12/2011 09:13:48 PM 1090 Views
Correct. - 14/12/2011 09:43:53 PM 1053 Views
Re: Correct. - 15/12/2011 05:54:37 AM 1015 Views
So many instances of logical laziness in that post... - 14/12/2011 10:01:45 PM 1469 Views
Re: So many instances of logical laziness in that post... - 15/12/2011 06:16:01 AM 975 Views
Only slight diffence I have is regarding general AS strength - 30/12/2011 04:45:49 PM 1037 Views
I think it was just Aes Sedai hyperbole - 15/12/2011 09:51:00 PM 857 Views
And entirely based off your shared assumption. - 14/12/2011 05:15:51 AM 1092 Views
Actually that's a lot of logical assumption. *NM* - 13/12/2011 01:28:00 PM 490 Views
But... - 14/12/2011 03:06:15 AM 862 Views
And - 30/12/2011 05:07:13 PM 973 Views
Yes - 13/12/2011 04:16:40 PM 1135 Views
Re: Yes - 13/12/2011 04:47:17 PM 1067 Views
Nah. Beyond the realm of possibility. Sorry, - 13/12/2011 05:12:40 PM 1099 Views
There are a number of comments from Q&As that shows that this is possible and more complex. - 13/12/2011 08:23:49 PM 1089 Views
None of which I disagree with, but a far cry from women being weaker just due to believing it... - 13/12/2011 08:39:40 PM 1009 Views
But that is my point: it wouldn't be merely force of will. - 13/12/2011 09:40:17 PM 973 Views
What Rand is doing... - 14/12/2011 03:43:08 AM 1100 Views
That would make sense given Min's vision - 16/12/2011 04:37:56 PM 911 Views
Wait.. I DIDN'T write that! - 14/12/2011 03:02:04 AM 970 Views
Reply to your question of - "Why use Logain gateway comparison as evidence:" - 17/12/2011 03:08:19 PM 1126 Views
You're basically saying "correlation equals causation"... - 18/12/2011 06:18:47 AM 1054 Views
On gateways - 18/12/2011 07:17:09 AM 1096 Views
Might assume that Elayne is stronger in the Power than Aviendha. - 19/12/2011 02:40:46 PM 1278 Views
I suspect he knows that... - 19/12/2011 05:53:00 PM 966 Views
Nope...some maths problems in your post. - 19/12/2011 07:41:29 PM 1012 Views
But 64 square feet is not Elayne's maximum... - 20/12/2011 02:46:50 AM 965 Views
But Shielding is also relative. - 27/12/2011 09:35:11 PM 2231 Views
Re: Underestimating Forsaken strength - 22/12/2011 05:24:53 PM 1034 Views

Reply to Message