Aviendha - her second trip thru the columns - is this just a good possibility or can she do something to change that future? Can Rand and Mat change that future? Mat being married to Fortuone (Tuon), they should have children, hopefully, and should teach that child the proper ways of dealing with Aes Sedai and Asha'men. Tuon, being what she is, should remove all collars and let the damane go to the White tower or back to the Wise Ones or the Sea Folk. I see a different use for the a'dam. That should be used to capture and control the remaining black ajah first off, but later, used only for teaching. But doesn't Tuon need to go back to Seanchan and reclaim her homeland? Are they going to try to conquer Shara also?
If the columns are true and no possibility to change that future, then the Aiel are doomed to become the true Aiel again. The Dragon will be reborn to destroy the Seanchan and send them back across the ocean, and bind the Aiel back to him for rescuing them from the evil Seanchan invaders.
If the columns are true and no possibility to change that future, then the Aiel are doomed to become the true Aiel again. The Dragon will be reborn to destroy the Seanchan and send them back across the ocean, and bind the Aiel back to him for rescuing them from the evil Seanchan invaders.
Aviendha, the columns, and the Seanchan
- 03/04/2012 04:29:31 PM
2167 Views
The entire point, I believe, is to give Avienda the opportunity to change that future
- 03/04/2012 05:13:48 PM
1543 Views
As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway.
- 03/04/2012 07:30:52 PM
1176 Views
Depends on how one defines Aiel
- 04/04/2012 04:11:11 AM
1143 Views
There are more than there were before.
- 04/04/2012 07:03:27 AM
1147 Views
But when the prophesy was made there many followers
- 04/04/2012 10:10:54 AM
1078 Views
The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 04/04/2012 06:28:47 PM
1167 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 05/04/2012 01:41:23 AM
1407 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 05/04/2012 07:39:04 AM
1214 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 05/04/2012 02:14:37 PM
1509 Views
Yes, I was thinking of the Aiel's suicidal traditions as well.
- 05/04/2012 06:24:56 PM
1051 Views
Re: Yes, I was thinking of the Aiel's suicidal traditions as well.
- 06/04/2012 12:20:31 AM
1234 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 06/04/2012 10:38:24 PM
1385 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 07/04/2012 06:27:27 AM
1082 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 07/04/2012 07:23:03 PM
998 Views
So what you're saying...
- 07/04/2012 10:07:59 PM
938 Views
What I am saying is that it's not a "pure bloodline" that makes one an Aiel
- 08/04/2012 12:16:10 AM
1049 Views
I never said it was.
- 08/04/2012 12:43:26 AM
1148 Views
Actually you did In your above post you speak of the Tinkers as not Aiel because they have been
- 08/04/2012 06:09:01 AM
1089 Views
No...
- 08/04/2012 07:12:22 AM
1181 Views
You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc
- 08/04/2012 05:16:54 PM
1170 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc
- 08/04/2012 06:43:27 PM
1180 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc
- 08/04/2012 07:52:10 PM
963 Views
Red hair is double recessive ... Doesn't take much to eliminate it from the gene pool. There could
- 08/04/2012 11:22:36 PM
1075 Views
You are consistently making the same mistake.
- 09/04/2012 02:45:46 AM
955 Views
They are the same thing. The remnant of a remnant are Aiel
- 10/04/2012 05:04:55 AM
1119 Views
No. They are not.
- 10/04/2012 05:42:29 AM
980 Views
Never said the remnant of the remnant was the whole of the Aiel
- 10/04/2012 05:45:47 PM
994 Views
You said that redefining the Aiel would allow Aviendha's vision to be possible.
- 10/04/2012 06:53:51 PM
1177 Views
No , I said there were many ways to interpret the statement based on how one defines Aiel
- 10/04/2012 07:36:11 PM
935 Views
All of which is entirely irrelevant.
- 10/04/2012 07:38:29 PM
964 Views
Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant
- 10/04/2012 07:47:04 PM
1027 Views
Re: Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant
- 11/04/2012 01:40:36 AM
1041 Views
That is what I just said
- 14/04/2012 01:41:56 AM
1001 Views
What is important about that?
- 14/04/2012 04:35:55 AM
965 Views
The importance is that the prophesy says that Rand
- 14/04/2012 06:06:31 PM
1131 Views
So what you're saying is...
- 14/04/2012 09:45:36 PM
1030 Views
That's exactly it
- 14/04/2012 11:21:25 PM
1085 Views
- 14/04/2012 11:21:25 PM
1085 Views
Good.
- 15/04/2012 02:01:14 AM
1113 Views
He sets it in motion, thus his actions lead to it
- 15/04/2012 02:55:13 PM
963 Views
Yes, but in that case, he is responsible for everything, ever.
- 15/04/2012 05:29:31 PM
1047 Views
We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing
- 15/04/2012 07:21:29 PM
996 Views
Re: We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing
- 17/04/2012 04:18:32 AM
1203 Views
Of course, but the point of my example was...
- 17/04/2012 06:08:09 PM
970 Views
Where are you getting this happens over thousands of years?
- 18/04/2012 01:47:42 PM
914 Views
Re: As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway.
- 04/04/2012 07:16:13 AM
1193 Views
Re: As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway.
- 06/04/2012 10:33:00 PM
1082 Views
