Aviendha - her second trip thru the columns - is this just a good possibility or can she do something to change that future? Can Rand and Mat change that future? Mat being married to Fortuone (Tuon), they should have children, hopefully, and should teach that child the proper ways of dealing with Aes Sedai and Asha'men. Tuon, being what she is, should remove all collars and let the damane go to the White tower or back to the Wise Ones or the Sea Folk. I see a different use for the a'dam. That should be used to capture and control the remaining black ajah first off, but later, used only for teaching. But doesn't Tuon need to go back to Seanchan and reclaim her homeland? Are they going to try to conquer Shara also?
If the columns are true and no possibility to change that future, then the Aiel are doomed to become the true Aiel again. The Dragon will be reborn to destroy the Seanchan and send them back across the ocean, and bind the Aiel back to him for rescuing them from the evil Seanchan invaders.
If the columns are true and no possibility to change that future, then the Aiel are doomed to become the true Aiel again. The Dragon will be reborn to destroy the Seanchan and send them back across the ocean, and bind the Aiel back to him for rescuing them from the evil Seanchan invaders.
Aviendha, the columns, and the Seanchan
- 03/04/2012 04:29:31 PM
2115 Views
The entire point, I believe, is to give Avienda the opportunity to change that future
- 03/04/2012 05:13:48 PM
1478 Views
As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway.
- 03/04/2012 07:30:52 PM
1130 Views
Depends on how one defines Aiel
- 04/04/2012 04:11:11 AM
1085 Views
There are more than there were before.
- 04/04/2012 07:03:27 AM
1083 Views
But when the prophesy was made there many followers
- 04/04/2012 10:10:54 AM
1016 Views
The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 04/04/2012 06:28:47 PM
1098 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 05/04/2012 01:41:23 AM
1335 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 05/04/2012 07:39:04 AM
1156 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 05/04/2012 02:14:37 PM
1398 Views
Yes, I was thinking of the Aiel's suicidal traditions as well.
- 05/04/2012 06:24:56 PM
997 Views
Re: Yes, I was thinking of the Aiel's suicidal traditions as well.
- 06/04/2012 12:20:31 AM
1162 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 06/04/2012 10:38:24 PM
1323 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 07/04/2012 06:27:27 AM
1017 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 07/04/2012 07:23:03 PM
946 Views
So what you're saying...
- 07/04/2012 10:07:59 PM
887 Views
What I am saying is that it's not a "pure bloodline" that makes one an Aiel
- 08/04/2012 12:16:10 AM
993 Views
I never said it was.
- 08/04/2012 12:43:26 AM
1088 Views
Actually you did In your above post you speak of the Tinkers as not Aiel because they have been
- 08/04/2012 06:09:01 AM
1026 Views
No...
- 08/04/2012 07:12:22 AM
1120 Views
You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc
- 08/04/2012 05:16:54 PM
1111 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc
- 08/04/2012 06:43:27 PM
1122 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc
- 08/04/2012 07:52:10 PM
900 Views
Red hair is double recessive ... Doesn't take much to eliminate it from the gene pool. There could
- 08/04/2012 11:22:36 PM
1028 Views
You are consistently making the same mistake.
- 09/04/2012 02:45:46 AM
901 Views
They are the same thing. The remnant of a remnant are Aiel
- 10/04/2012 05:04:55 AM
1058 Views
No. They are not.
- 10/04/2012 05:42:29 AM
930 Views
Never said the remnant of the remnant was the whole of the Aiel
- 10/04/2012 05:45:47 PM
934 Views
You said that redefining the Aiel would allow Aviendha's vision to be possible.
- 10/04/2012 06:53:51 PM
1119 Views
No , I said there were many ways to interpret the statement based on how one defines Aiel
- 10/04/2012 07:36:11 PM
895 Views
All of which is entirely irrelevant.
- 10/04/2012 07:38:29 PM
914 Views
Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant
- 10/04/2012 07:47:04 PM
963 Views
Re: Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant
- 11/04/2012 01:40:36 AM
979 Views
That is what I just said
- 14/04/2012 01:41:56 AM
934 Views
What is important about that?
- 14/04/2012 04:35:55 AM
911 Views
The importance is that the prophesy says that Rand
- 14/04/2012 06:06:31 PM
1076 Views
So what you're saying is...
- 14/04/2012 09:45:36 PM
974 Views
That's exactly it
- 14/04/2012 11:21:25 PM
1031 Views
- 14/04/2012 11:21:25 PM
1031 Views
Good.
- 15/04/2012 02:01:14 AM
1054 Views
He sets it in motion, thus his actions lead to it
- 15/04/2012 02:55:13 PM
898 Views
Yes, but in that case, he is responsible for everything, ever.
- 15/04/2012 05:29:31 PM
996 Views
We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing
- 15/04/2012 07:21:29 PM
942 Views
Re: We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing
- 17/04/2012 04:18:32 AM
1139 Views
Of course, but the point of my example was...
- 17/04/2012 06:08:09 PM
913 Views
Where are you getting this happens over thousands of years?
- 18/04/2012 01:47:42 PM
868 Views
Re: As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway.
- 04/04/2012 07:16:13 AM
1133 Views
Re: As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway.
- 06/04/2012 10:33:00 PM
1031 Views
