You are consistently making the same mistake.
Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 09/04/2012 02:45:46 AM
i think the Aiel who will survive as the remnant will be those that accept the true heritage of the Aiel.
Nobody has argued against that possibility. As I discussed with DomA, it is in fact most probable that it will play a significant part.
The issue, if you will recall, is that I claimed that the fact that the Aiel were not destroyed in Aviendha's vision meant that it was impossible according to more reliable prophecies. You claimed that alternate definitions of the Aiel could render this possible.
Since then, I've been trying to get you to provide a definition of the Aiel that makes this possible. But you haven't. Every time it comes down to it, you are redefining the "remnant of a remnant", not the "Aiel".
The prophecy contains two parts: A remnant of a remnant of those who call themselves Aiel will be destroyed, and the rest of them will be destroyed. If you can redefine Aiel in a way that is both consistent with Aviendha's vision and with both parts of this prophecy, feel free to do so.
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter
Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
~Master Splinter
Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Aviendha, the columns, and the Seanchan
- 03/04/2012 04:29:31 PM
2141 Views
The entire point, I believe, is to give Avienda the opportunity to change that future
- 03/04/2012 05:13:48 PM
1511 Views
As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway.
- 03/04/2012 07:30:52 PM
1153 Views
Depends on how one defines Aiel
- 04/04/2012 04:11:11 AM
1116 Views
There are more than there were before.
- 04/04/2012 07:03:27 AM
1119 Views
But when the prophesy was made there many followers
- 04/04/2012 10:10:54 AM
1044 Views
The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 04/04/2012 06:28:47 PM
1133 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 05/04/2012 01:41:23 AM
1376 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 05/04/2012 07:39:04 AM
1185 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 05/04/2012 02:14:37 PM
1469 Views
Yes, I was thinking of the Aiel's suicidal traditions as well.
- 05/04/2012 06:24:56 PM
1027 Views
Re: Yes, I was thinking of the Aiel's suicidal traditions as well.
- 06/04/2012 12:20:31 AM
1194 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 06/04/2012 10:38:24 PM
1351 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 07/04/2012 06:27:27 AM
1053 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 07/04/2012 07:23:03 PM
972 Views
So what you're saying...
- 07/04/2012 10:07:59 PM
914 Views
What I am saying is that it's not a "pure bloodline" that makes one an Aiel
- 08/04/2012 12:16:10 AM
1016 Views
I never said it was.
- 08/04/2012 12:43:26 AM
1117 Views
Actually you did In your above post you speak of the Tinkers as not Aiel because they have been
- 08/04/2012 06:09:01 AM
1057 Views
No...
- 08/04/2012 07:12:22 AM
1152 Views
You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc
- 08/04/2012 05:16:54 PM
1141 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc
- 08/04/2012 06:43:27 PM
1150 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc
- 08/04/2012 07:52:10 PM
934 Views
Red hair is double recessive ... Doesn't take much to eliminate it from the gene pool. There could
- 08/04/2012 11:22:36 PM
1050 Views
You are consistently making the same mistake.
- 09/04/2012 02:45:46 AM
930 Views
They are the same thing. The remnant of a remnant are Aiel
- 10/04/2012 05:04:55 AM
1082 Views
No. They are not.
- 10/04/2012 05:42:29 AM
956 Views
Never said the remnant of the remnant was the whole of the Aiel
- 10/04/2012 05:45:47 PM
963 Views
You said that redefining the Aiel would allow Aviendha's vision to be possible.
- 10/04/2012 06:53:51 PM
1145 Views
No , I said there were many ways to interpret the statement based on how one defines Aiel
- 10/04/2012 07:36:11 PM
920 Views
All of which is entirely irrelevant.
- 10/04/2012 07:38:29 PM
938 Views
Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant
- 10/04/2012 07:47:04 PM
998 Views
Re: Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant
- 11/04/2012 01:40:36 AM
1010 Views
That is what I just said
- 14/04/2012 01:41:56 AM
968 Views
What is important about that?
- 14/04/2012 04:35:55 AM
932 Views
The importance is that the prophesy says that Rand
- 14/04/2012 06:06:31 PM
1108 Views
So what you're saying is...
- 14/04/2012 09:45:36 PM
997 Views
That's exactly it
- 14/04/2012 11:21:25 PM
1060 Views
- 14/04/2012 11:21:25 PM
1060 Views
Good.
- 15/04/2012 02:01:14 AM
1082 Views
He sets it in motion, thus his actions lead to it
- 15/04/2012 02:55:13 PM
932 Views
Yes, but in that case, he is responsible for everything, ever.
- 15/04/2012 05:29:31 PM
1019 Views
We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing
- 15/04/2012 07:21:29 PM
972 Views
Re: We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing
- 17/04/2012 04:18:32 AM
1175 Views
Of course, but the point of my example was...
- 17/04/2012 06:08:09 PM
940 Views
Where are you getting this happens over thousands of years?
- 18/04/2012 01:47:42 PM
891 Views
Re: As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway.
- 04/04/2012 07:16:13 AM
1164 Views
Re: As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway.
- 06/04/2012 10:33:00 PM
1056 Views
