Active Users:1005 Time:03/08/2025 06:03:19 PM
That is what I just said darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 14/04/2012 01:41:56 AM
The second statement is an active not a passive statement. It does not say "a remnant of a remnant will survive being broken"


"He shall spill out the blood of those who call themselves Aiel as water on sand, and he shall break them as dried twigs, yet the remnant of a remnant shall he save, and they shall live."


No one thinks the remnant of a remnant will die ... The important statement here is the remnant of a remnant shall he save
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
Aviendha, the columns, and the Seanchan - 03/04/2012 04:29:31 PM 2007 Views
As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway. - 03/04/2012 07:30:52 PM 1032 Views
Depends on how one defines Aiel - 04/04/2012 04:11:11 AM 984 Views
There are more than there were before. - 04/04/2012 07:03:27 AM 998 Views
But when the prophesy was made there many followers - 04/04/2012 10:10:54 AM 909 Views
The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 04/04/2012 06:28:47 PM 996 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 05/04/2012 01:41:23 AM 1198 Views
Well that more than covers it *NM* - 05/04/2012 04:43:53 AM 478 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 05/04/2012 07:39:04 AM 1043 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 05/04/2012 02:14:37 PM 1278 Views
For the record I agree that the visions are not true either - 05/04/2012 02:25:47 PM 976 Views
Re: For the record I agree that the visions are not true either - 05/04/2012 11:36:53 PM 950 Views
Yes, I was thinking of the Aiel's suicidal traditions as well. - 05/04/2012 06:24:56 PM 898 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 06/04/2012 10:51:00 PM 943 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 06/04/2012 10:38:24 PM 1195 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 07/04/2012 06:27:27 AM 895 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 07/04/2012 07:23:03 PM 861 Views
So what you're saying... - 07/04/2012 10:07:59 PM 798 Views
What I am saying is that it's not a "pure bloodline" that makes one an Aiel - 08/04/2012 12:16:10 AM 898 Views
I never said it was. - 08/04/2012 12:43:26 AM 966 Views
Actually you did In your above post you speak of the Tinkers as not Aiel because they have been - 08/04/2012 06:09:01 AM 903 Views
No... - 08/04/2012 07:12:22 AM 1014 Views
You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc - 08/04/2012 05:16:54 PM 982 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc - 08/04/2012 06:43:27 PM 1008 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc - 08/04/2012 07:52:10 PM 797 Views
Thanks for that. - 09/04/2012 02:38:25 AM 728 Views
Red hair is double recessive ... Doesn't take much to eliminate it from the gene pool. There could - 08/04/2012 11:22:36 PM 938 Views
You are consistently making the same mistake. - 09/04/2012 02:45:46 AM 790 Views
They are the same thing. The remnant of a remnant are Aiel - 10/04/2012 05:04:55 AM 937 Views
No. They are not. - 10/04/2012 05:42:29 AM 828 Views
Never said the remnant of the remnant was the whole of the Aiel - 10/04/2012 05:45:47 PM 846 Views
You said that redefining the Aiel would allow Aviendha's vision to be possible. - 10/04/2012 06:53:51 PM 1026 Views
No , I said there were many ways to interpret the statement based on how one defines Aiel - 10/04/2012 07:36:11 PM 795 Views
All of which is entirely irrelevant. - 10/04/2012 07:38:29 PM 815 Views
Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant - 10/04/2012 07:47:04 PM 890 Views
Re: Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant - 11/04/2012 01:40:36 AM 870 Views
That is what I just said - 14/04/2012 01:41:56 AM 830 Views
What is important about that? - 14/04/2012 04:35:55 AM 809 Views
The importance is that the prophesy says that Rand - 14/04/2012 06:06:31 PM 977 Views
So what you're saying is... - 14/04/2012 09:45:36 PM 860 Views
That's exactly it - 14/04/2012 11:21:25 PM 927 Views
Good. - 15/04/2012 02:01:14 AM 950 Views
He sets it in motion, thus his actions lead to it - 15/04/2012 02:55:13 PM 808 Views
Yes, but in that case, he is responsible for everything, ever. - 15/04/2012 05:29:31 PM 916 Views
We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing - 15/04/2012 07:21:29 PM 806 Views
Re: We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing - 17/04/2012 04:18:32 AM 1013 Views
Depends on how you look at the Prophesy - 18/04/2012 01:45:23 PM 758 Views
Of course, but the point of my example was... - 17/04/2012 06:08:09 PM 800 Views
Where are you getting this happens over thousands of years? - 18/04/2012 01:47:42 PM 797 Views
Because that was the important part of that post. - 18/04/2012 05:28:10 PM 932 Views
Don't know when this became about winning - 19/04/2012 02:08:16 AM 712 Views
Re: I never said it was. - 18/04/2012 12:37:23 AM 986 Views
Re: As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway. - 04/04/2012 07:16:13 AM 1028 Views
Re: As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway. - 06/04/2012 10:33:00 PM 923 Views
Thank you for that analysis. *NM* - 17/04/2012 12:36:08 AM 460 Views

Reply to Message