The importance is that the prophesy says that Rand
darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 14/04/2012 06:06:31 PM
No one thinks the remnant of a remnant will die ...
The relevant part is that it contrasts the remnant of the remnant with the rest of the Aiel. If the remnant is distinct in that they shall live, then what do you think that makes the others?
Will SAVE THEM ... Not that they will survive or that they will be the ONLY survivors Rand saves, only that a remnant of the Aiel will be part of those he saves. The rest will obviously die out, but that does not mean they will die immediately following TG. We heard Aviendha's vision speak of the "Peace of the Dragon" and we then saw the Aiel of the Waste break that peace and ultimately die out. There is no mention at all of possible people who honored the Peace (i.e. went back to The Way) and thus represent the remnant spoken of in the Prophesy. In short I am saying it is possible that the remnant of the Aiel in the Prophesy will go on to be part of a new larger group who honor the Peace of the Dragon and are in essence the "reborn Aiel".
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
This message last edited by darius_sedai on 14/04/2012 at 06:08:51 PM
Aviendha, the columns, and the Seanchan
03/04/2012 04:29:31 PM
- 1989 Views
The entire point, I believe, is to give Avienda the opportunity to change that future
03/04/2012 05:13:48 PM
- 1352 Views
As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway.
03/04/2012 07:30:52 PM
- 1011 Views
Depends on how one defines Aiel
04/04/2012 04:11:11 AM
- 962 Views
There are more than there were before.
04/04/2012 07:03:27 AM
- 976 Views
But when the prophesy was made there many followers
04/04/2012 10:10:54 AM
- 889 Views
The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
04/04/2012 06:28:47 PM
- 975 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
05/04/2012 01:41:23 AM
- 1148 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
05/04/2012 07:39:04 AM
- 1020 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
05/04/2012 02:14:37 PM
- 1257 Views
Yes, I was thinking of the Aiel's suicidal traditions as well.
05/04/2012 06:24:56 PM
- 880 Views
Re: Yes, I was thinking of the Aiel's suicidal traditions as well.
06/04/2012 12:20:31 AM
- 1030 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
06/04/2012 10:38:24 PM
- 1170 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
07/04/2012 06:27:27 AM
- 874 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
07/04/2012 07:23:03 PM
- 843 Views
So what you're saying...
07/04/2012 10:07:59 PM
- 781 Views
What I am saying is that it's not a "pure bloodline" that makes one an Aiel
08/04/2012 12:16:10 AM
- 873 Views
I never said it was.
08/04/2012 12:43:26 AM
- 946 Views
Actually you did In your above post you speak of the Tinkers as not Aiel because they have been
08/04/2012 06:09:01 AM
- 886 Views
No...
08/04/2012 07:12:22 AM
- 995 Views
You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc
08/04/2012 05:16:54 PM
- 964 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc
08/04/2012 06:43:27 PM
- 986 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc
08/04/2012 07:52:10 PM
- 779 Views
Red hair is double recessive ... Doesn't take much to eliminate it from the gene pool. There could
08/04/2012 11:22:36 PM
- 918 Views
You are consistently making the same mistake.
09/04/2012 02:45:46 AM
- 771 Views
They are the same thing. The remnant of a remnant are Aiel
10/04/2012 05:04:55 AM
- 919 Views
No. They are not.
10/04/2012 05:42:29 AM
- 809 Views
Never said the remnant of the remnant was the whole of the Aiel
10/04/2012 05:45:47 PM
- 825 Views
You said that redefining the Aiel would allow Aviendha's vision to be possible.
10/04/2012 06:53:51 PM
- 1004 Views
No , I said there were many ways to interpret the statement based on how one defines Aiel
10/04/2012 07:36:11 PM
- 772 Views
All of which is entirely irrelevant.
10/04/2012 07:38:29 PM
- 797 Views
Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant
10/04/2012 07:47:04 PM
- 870 Views
Re: Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant
11/04/2012 01:40:36 AM
- 851 Views
That is what I just said
14/04/2012 01:41:56 AM
- 811 Views
What is important about that?
14/04/2012 04:35:55 AM
- 790 Views
The importance is that the prophesy says that Rand
14/04/2012 06:06:31 PM
- 959 Views
So what you're saying is...
14/04/2012 09:45:36 PM
- 839 Views
That's exactly it
14/04/2012 11:21:25 PM
- 907 Views

Good.
15/04/2012 02:01:14 AM
- 930 Views
He sets it in motion, thus his actions lead to it
15/04/2012 02:55:13 PM
- 791 Views
Yes, but in that case, he is responsible for everything, ever.
15/04/2012 05:29:31 PM
- 899 Views
We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing
15/04/2012 07:21:29 PM
- 786 Views
Re: We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing
17/04/2012 04:18:32 AM
- 988 Views
Of course, but the point of my example was...
17/04/2012 06:08:09 PM
- 781 Views
Where are you getting this happens over thousands of years?
18/04/2012 01:47:42 PM
- 778 Views
Re: As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway.
04/04/2012 07:16:13 AM
- 1010 Views