Active Users:652 Time:18/12/2025 02:15:28 PM
Yes, but in that case, he is responsible for everything, ever. Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 15/04/2012 05:29:31 PM
Because Rand will save existence itself from Shai'tan, anything and everything that happens does so only because Rand allowed it to be preventing the total annihilation of everything.
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter

Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Reply to message
Aviendha, the columns, and the Seanchan - 03/04/2012 04:29:31 PM 2115 Views
As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway. - 03/04/2012 07:30:52 PM 1131 Views
Depends on how one defines Aiel - 04/04/2012 04:11:11 AM 1086 Views
There are more than there were before. - 04/04/2012 07:03:27 AM 1083 Views
But when the prophesy was made there many followers - 04/04/2012 10:10:54 AM 1016 Views
The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 04/04/2012 06:28:47 PM 1099 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 05/04/2012 01:41:23 AM 1335 Views
Well that more than covers it *NM* - 05/04/2012 04:43:53 AM 525 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 05/04/2012 07:39:04 AM 1157 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 05/04/2012 02:14:37 PM 1399 Views
For the record I agree that the visions are not true either - 05/04/2012 02:25:47 PM 1070 Views
Re: For the record I agree that the visions are not true either - 05/04/2012 11:36:53 PM 1065 Views
Yes, I was thinking of the Aiel's suicidal traditions as well. - 05/04/2012 06:24:56 PM 997 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 06/04/2012 10:51:00 PM 1032 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 06/04/2012 10:38:24 PM 1323 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 07/04/2012 06:27:27 AM 1018 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 07/04/2012 07:23:03 PM 947 Views
So what you're saying... - 07/04/2012 10:07:59 PM 887 Views
What I am saying is that it's not a "pure bloodline" that makes one an Aiel - 08/04/2012 12:16:10 AM 993 Views
I never said it was. - 08/04/2012 12:43:26 AM 1089 Views
Actually you did In your above post you speak of the Tinkers as not Aiel because they have been - 08/04/2012 06:09:01 AM 1026 Views
No... - 08/04/2012 07:12:22 AM 1121 Views
You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc - 08/04/2012 05:16:54 PM 1112 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc - 08/04/2012 06:43:27 PM 1122 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc - 08/04/2012 07:52:10 PM 900 Views
Thanks for that. - 09/04/2012 02:38:25 AM 814 Views
Red hair is double recessive ... Doesn't take much to eliminate it from the gene pool. There could - 08/04/2012 11:22:36 PM 1029 Views
You are consistently making the same mistake. - 09/04/2012 02:45:46 AM 902 Views
They are the same thing. The remnant of a remnant are Aiel - 10/04/2012 05:04:55 AM 1058 Views
No. They are not. - 10/04/2012 05:42:29 AM 931 Views
Never said the remnant of the remnant was the whole of the Aiel - 10/04/2012 05:45:47 PM 935 Views
You said that redefining the Aiel would allow Aviendha's vision to be possible. - 10/04/2012 06:53:51 PM 1120 Views
No , I said there were many ways to interpret the statement based on how one defines Aiel - 10/04/2012 07:36:11 PM 895 Views
All of which is entirely irrelevant. - 10/04/2012 07:38:29 PM 915 Views
Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant - 10/04/2012 07:47:04 PM 964 Views
Re: Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant - 11/04/2012 01:40:36 AM 980 Views
That is what I just said - 14/04/2012 01:41:56 AM 934 Views
What is important about that? - 14/04/2012 04:35:55 AM 912 Views
The importance is that the prophesy says that Rand - 14/04/2012 06:06:31 PM 1076 Views
So what you're saying is... - 14/04/2012 09:45:36 PM 974 Views
That's exactly it - 14/04/2012 11:21:25 PM 1031 Views
Good. - 15/04/2012 02:01:14 AM 1055 Views
He sets it in motion, thus his actions lead to it - 15/04/2012 02:55:13 PM 898 Views
Yes, but in that case, he is responsible for everything, ever. - 15/04/2012 05:29:31 PM 997 Views
We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing - 15/04/2012 07:21:29 PM 942 Views
Re: We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing - 17/04/2012 04:18:32 AM 1139 Views
Depends on how you look at the Prophesy - 18/04/2012 01:45:23 PM 868 Views
Of course, but the point of my example was... - 17/04/2012 06:08:09 PM 913 Views
Where are you getting this happens over thousands of years? - 18/04/2012 01:47:42 PM 868 Views
Because that was the important part of that post. - 18/04/2012 05:28:10 PM 1023 Views
Don't know when this became about winning - 19/04/2012 02:08:16 AM 813 Views
Re: I never said it was. - 18/04/2012 12:37:23 AM 1113 Views
Re: As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway. - 04/04/2012 07:16:13 AM 1133 Views
Re: As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway. - 06/04/2012 10:33:00 PM 1031 Views
Thank you for that analysis. *NM* - 17/04/2012 12:36:08 AM 504 Views

Reply to Message