I think it just comes down to an overall portrayal in RJ's universe of a general state of reality in his universe, in which males need to get ahead or gain status by showing fighting prowess or demonstrating/exercising their strength, while females get ahead or gain status by showing cunning and increased intelligence.
As a result, the male upper tiers are weighted towards men who possess one factor, while the female upper tiers are weighted towards another factor. Both can achieve the dominant position in the overall hierarchy, but neither side possesses an overall advantage in the long run. After all, strategy is not the same thing as being successful as a general.
After studying "The Art of War" by Sun Tzu, for example, the best victories were the ones in which the battlefield victory was determined before a battle was even fought - in this case, if Moghedien has defeated her opponents, and appropriated to herself their status, belongings and territories through superior cunning, it doesn't really matter if she was good at using her troops or accompanying them to the battlefield - the key word is "victory".
Ironically, strategically speaking, among the males named as the best generals are two that have permanently been defeated, one who was defeated by a far weaker opponent during a battle when his tactics should have given him a greater advantage and one is often criticized for planning such elaborate and risky maneouvers that often he was beaten or matched by opponents who didn't try to implement the "perfect plan" in order to gain recognition of genius.
It seems to me that the female Forsaken are the more skilled strategic and tactical thinkers - they're the ones surviving and most of them are concentrated on total victory rather than risking winning each battlefield just to lose the war.
"This person is a great general" doesn't necessarily mean much beyond a general statement that they have accomplished much on various battlefields. The "best generals" IMHO would be able to defeat their opponents before war was declared. So the terminology is rather vague - especially since we're not really aware of finer points of the duties of generals during the Age of Legends, nor the skills that were required.
As a result, the male upper tiers are weighted towards men who possess one factor, while the female upper tiers are weighted towards another factor. Both can achieve the dominant position in the overall hierarchy, but neither side possesses an overall advantage in the long run. After all, strategy is not the same thing as being successful as a general.
After studying "The Art of War" by Sun Tzu, for example, the best victories were the ones in which the battlefield victory was determined before a battle was even fought - in this case, if Moghedien has defeated her opponents, and appropriated to herself their status, belongings and territories through superior cunning, it doesn't really matter if she was good at using her troops or accompanying them to the battlefield - the key word is "victory".
Ironically, strategically speaking, among the males named as the best generals are two that have permanently been defeated, one who was defeated by a far weaker opponent during a battle when his tactics should have given him a greater advantage and one is often criticized for planning such elaborate and risky maneouvers that often he was beaten or matched by opponents who didn't try to implement the "perfect plan" in order to gain recognition of genius.
It seems to me that the female Forsaken are the more skilled strategic and tactical thinkers - they're the ones surviving and most of them are concentrated on total victory rather than risking winning each battlefield just to lose the war.
"This person is a great general" doesn't necessarily mean much beyond a general statement that they have accomplished much on various battlefields. The "best generals" IMHO would be able to defeat their opponents before war was declared. So the terminology is rather vague - especially since we're not really aware of finer points of the duties of generals during the Age of Legends, nor the skills that were required.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
This message last edited by RugbyPlayingAshaman on 01/10/2009 at 07:45:04 PM
Are women really bad generals?
- 01/10/2009 07:05:03 PM
1597 Views
No.
- 01/10/2009 07:41:35 PM
1050 Views
Or RJ just loves stacking ridiculously unfavourable odds against the male Forsaken generals...
- 01/10/2009 08:40:47 PM
1122 Views
Lol... too true
- 01/10/2009 09:32:29 PM
1050 Views
And you guys whine about the lameness of RJ's villains?
- 01/10/2009 09:41:54 PM
1066 Views
I still haven't seen proof of Demandred or Ishamael's "brilliance".
- 01/10/2009 09:56:41 PM
856 Views
but you are difficult to please
- 02/10/2009 05:10:13 AM
808 Views
But they are lame... they've done minimal damage to the Light
- 02/10/2009 05:06:05 AM
756 Views
You can't have it both ways....
- 02/10/2009 06:47:21 AM
846 Views
Why not?
- 02/10/2009 08:45:35 AM
811 Views
Yeah
- 01/10/2009 09:57:01 PM
843 Views
Re: Yeah
- 01/10/2009 10:40:28 PM
827 Views
I thought the same in the past...
- 02/10/2009 07:01:18 AM
799 Views
Gah! Hate!
- 02/10/2009 04:11:49 PM
809 Views
Ah, come on...
- 02/10/2009 04:41:37 PM
799 Views
No no, I was just being pouty that I haven't read the new stuff yet.
- 02/10/2009 05:01:15 PM
798 Views
- 02/10/2009 05:01:15 PM
798 Views
Re: Or RJ just loves stacking ridiculously unfavourable odds against the male Forsaken generals...
- 01/10/2009 09:51:30 PM
885 Views
Good points! Also, these "generals" haven't actually fielded any troops
- 01/10/2009 11:23:40 PM
768 Views
But as individuals they are meant to be deadly too
- 02/10/2009 05:09:21 AM
753 Views
Well, yeah. They're knowledgable and deadly in person. Generalship doesn't come into it.
- 04/10/2009 12:09:50 AM
737 Views
nope
- 01/10/2009 08:06:57 PM
900 Views
Tylee Kirgan, Birgitte, and one other, Egeanin
- 01/10/2009 09:47:00 PM
1195 Views
Birgitte's not a soldier though.
- 01/10/2009 10:10:50 PM
782 Views
She says she's not, but so does Mat.
- 01/10/2009 10:34:04 PM
695 Views
- 01/10/2009 10:34:04 PM
695 Views
Mat's not a soldier, either - he's a general
- 01/10/2009 10:51:29 PM
840 Views
Birgitte is too cautious to be better than an adequate tactician.
- 02/10/2009 04:22:45 AM
810 Views
My opinion
- 02/10/2009 01:30:12 AM
1207 Views
That's a poor excuse
- 02/10/2009 11:59:42 AM
718 Views
I disagree
- 02/10/2009 04:26:28 PM
807 Views
Re: I disagree
- 02/10/2009 08:31:29 PM
1038 Views
Oh, puh-lease.
- 02/10/2009 09:09:30 PM
963 Views
Re: Oh, puh-lease.
- 03/10/2009 04:52:37 PM
788 Views
Re: Oh, puh-lease.
- 05/10/2009 05:08:27 PM
3259 Views
I always know I've out-argued an idiot when they fall back on the tired old "RJ wanted it that way"
- 06/10/2009 04:42:11 AM
853 Views
And I can tell you're through when you've gotten to three+ insults per paragraph.
- 06/10/2009 05:46:24 PM
936 Views
Monday morning quarterbacking at its worst
- 04/10/2009 07:28:36 AM
901 Views
Men and football.
- 05/10/2009 04:49:35 PM
822 Views
She didn't kill anyone! Why SHOULD she feel guilty? She gave necessary orders.
- 06/10/2009 03:33:15 AM
893 Views


