Active Users:1720 Time:18/03/2026 11:34:28 AM
Of course, they should still be guarded with restricted access. Cannoli Send a noteboard - 03/10/2009 09:02:21 PM

There are too many people who know how to Heal stilling. If Semirhage, for instance, can no longer channel, people will let their guard up. This will allow some darkfriend to Heal her.
But if they are going to get that kind of access to your prisoner, a shield wouldn't have done any good anyway. I would, of course, keep channelers guarding them as I would anything I thought might be a target of interest to Shadow channelers, or else use wards of some kind on their cell.

The best thing is to kill them immediately.
I am talking about severing as a simple security precaution if political necessity or whatever reason precludes this. My point is basically that if they are going to hold them prisoner, hold them severed, rather than shielded. If I had been in charge in Caemlyn, I'd have given all the sisters a very fast trial and a long drop on a short rope before Pelivar & co's note requesting safe passage arrived. But Elayne anticipates a reprimand for merely stripping them of their Great Serpent rings. If I had been a person of any influence in Rand's inner-circle, I'd have Semirhage dead already - by naming herself Semirhage, she forfeits even the basic civil right to a trial. But for whatever (idiotic) reason, the characters have chosen to hold them prisoner. If you are going to do that, IMO, stilling is safer.
Cannoli
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless

“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
Reply to message
Still the Darkfriends. - 03/10/2009 05:25:29 PM 2276 Views
ya this does work - 03/10/2009 06:32:22 PM 846 Views
Totally Agree. *NM* - 03/10/2009 06:38:27 PM 425 Views
Makes sense, but... - 03/10/2009 07:04:27 PM 1010 Views
Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know how - 03/10/2009 07:16:03 PM 1232 Views
Is this the real stilling? - 04/10/2009 09:06:32 AM 1362 Views
It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 02:55:35 PM 961 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:46:58 PM 1518 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:53:52 PM 994 Views
I think Egwene took longer because it was the first time. *NM* - 04/10/2009 07:20:26 PM 399 Views
Not in my opinion - 05/10/2009 05:00:30 AM 1244 Views
How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 05:15:57 AM 814 Views
Re: How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 09:07:16 PM 866 Views
Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 12:20:21 AM 795 Views
Re: Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 07:30:04 AM 894 Views
I disagree. - 04/10/2009 10:03:56 PM 891 Views
Re: I disagree. - 05/10/2009 04:58:04 AM 923 Views
Then... - 05/10/2009 05:12:45 AM 817 Views
Re: Then... - 05/10/2009 09:09:04 PM 830 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 12:25:22 AM 920 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 07:51:48 AM 836 Views
I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 02:18:01 AM 891 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 07:50:33 AM 1041 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 02:28:34 AM 945 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 08:20:34 AM 879 Views
Well, you may, but I remain unconvinced . - 08/10/2009 12:22:31 AM 1008 Views
I think it's too risky - 03/10/2009 07:21:51 PM 961 Views
Of course, they should still be guarded with restricted access. - 03/10/2009 09:02:21 PM 1027 Views
Re: I think it's too risky - 05/10/2009 04:51:17 AM 864 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 04:51:58 AM 1074 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 02:06:51 PM 925 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 05:45:16 PM 1686 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 07:20:58 PM 942 Views
To Clarify... - 05/10/2009 12:30:28 AM 1029 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 05/10/2009 02:54:40 PM 1550 Views
Remember Shadar Logoth - 04/10/2009 02:49:06 PM 833 Views
Re: Remember Shadar Logoth - 05/10/2009 06:05:54 AM 942 Views
From Rand's viewpoint - 05/10/2009 01:10:18 PM 1644 Views

Reply to Message