Active Users:611 Time:02/08/2025 08:38:56 PM
Is this the real stilling? Etzel Send a noteboard - 04/10/2009 09:06:32 AM
I think in these examples you cited the channelers lost their ability to channel, because someone else violently broke a weave (especially a shield) by them, while they were channeling. This obviously doesn't seem to be the "officially" precise stilling weave, but rather like a forced explosion of the ability to channel (in this respect rather similar to burning out). However, this form of stilling someone seems quite risky, because it requires that your opponent channels, and it probably might kill him.

I only dimly remember this, but doesn't Siuan even indicate that she was stilled by a circle of AS in a process that took some time. So, apparently the real stilling is a bit more complicated, because it's basically a very delicate "surgically" removal of the ability to channel.

Since Rand & Co. likely don't know how this exactly works (or e.g. Cadsuane doesn't want to give it away), it would explain why they don't do it.
Reply to message
Still the Darkfriends. - 03/10/2009 05:25:29 PM 2113 Views
ya this does work - 03/10/2009 06:32:22 PM 703 Views
Totally Agree. *NM* - 03/10/2009 06:38:27 PM 359 Views
Makes sense, but... - 03/10/2009 07:04:27 PM 851 Views
Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know how - 03/10/2009 07:16:03 PM 1095 Views
Is this the real stilling? - 04/10/2009 09:06:32 AM 1211 Views
It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 02:55:35 PM 818 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:46:58 PM 1376 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:53:52 PM 831 Views
I think Egwene took longer because it was the first time. *NM* - 04/10/2009 07:20:26 PM 326 Views
Not in my opinion - 05/10/2009 05:00:30 AM 1112 Views
How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 05:15:57 AM 689 Views
Re: How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 09:07:16 PM 719 Views
Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 12:20:21 AM 663 Views
Re: Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 07:30:04 AM 729 Views
I disagree. - 04/10/2009 10:03:56 PM 773 Views
Re: I disagree. - 05/10/2009 04:58:04 AM 790 Views
Then... - 05/10/2009 05:12:45 AM 687 Views
Re: Then... - 05/10/2009 09:09:04 PM 705 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 12:25:22 AM 762 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 07:51:48 AM 708 Views
I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 02:18:01 AM 744 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 07:50:33 AM 911 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 02:28:34 AM 792 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 08:20:34 AM 732 Views
Well, you may, but I remain unconvinced . - 08/10/2009 12:22:31 AM 839 Views
I think it's too risky - 03/10/2009 07:21:51 PM 818 Views
Of course, they should still be guarded with restricted access. - 03/10/2009 09:02:21 PM 871 Views
Re: I think it's too risky - 05/10/2009 04:51:17 AM 695 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 04:51:58 AM 926 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 02:06:51 PM 772 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 05:45:16 PM 1509 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 07:20:58 PM 786 Views
To Clarify... - 05/10/2009 12:30:28 AM 868 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 05/10/2009 02:54:40 PM 1409 Views
Remember Shadar Logoth - 04/10/2009 02:49:06 PM 700 Views
Re: Remember Shadar Logoth - 05/10/2009 06:05:54 AM 815 Views
From Rand's viewpoint - 05/10/2009 01:10:18 PM 1485 Views

Reply to Message