Active Users:2328 Time:18/06/2026 05:26:07 AM
Is this the real stilling? Etzel Send a noteboard - 04/10/2009 09:06:32 AM
I think in these examples you cited the channelers lost their ability to channel, because someone else violently broke a weave (especially a shield) by them, while they were channeling. This obviously doesn't seem to be the "officially" precise stilling weave, but rather like a forced explosion of the ability to channel (in this respect rather similar to burning out). However, this form of stilling someone seems quite risky, because it requires that your opponent channels, and it probably might kill him.

I only dimly remember this, but doesn't Siuan even indicate that she was stilled by a circle of AS in a process that took some time. So, apparently the real stilling is a bit more complicated, because it's basically a very delicate "surgically" removal of the ability to channel.

Since Rand & Co. likely don't know how this exactly works (or e.g. Cadsuane doesn't want to give it away), it would explain why they don't do it.
Reply to message
Still the Darkfriends. - 03/10/2009 05:25:29 PM 2334 Views
ya this does work - 03/10/2009 06:32:22 PM 901 Views
Totally Agree. *NM* - 03/10/2009 06:38:27 PM 457 Views
Makes sense, but... - 03/10/2009 07:04:27 PM 1070 Views
Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know how - 03/10/2009 07:16:03 PM 1290 Views
Is this the real stilling? - 04/10/2009 09:06:32 AM 1427 Views
It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 02:55:35 PM 1019 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:46:58 PM 1581 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:53:52 PM 1047 Views
I think Egwene took longer because it was the first time. *NM* - 04/10/2009 07:20:26 PM 431 Views
Not in my opinion - 05/10/2009 05:00:30 AM 1308 Views
How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 05:15:57 AM 871 Views
Re: How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 09:07:16 PM 925 Views
Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 12:20:21 AM 849 Views
Re: Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 07:30:04 AM 964 Views
I disagree. - 04/10/2009 10:03:56 PM 943 Views
Re: I disagree. - 05/10/2009 04:58:04 AM 985 Views
Then... - 05/10/2009 05:12:45 AM 894 Views
Re: Then... - 05/10/2009 09:09:04 PM 892 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 12:25:22 AM 997 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 07:51:48 AM 903 Views
I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 02:18:01 AM 952 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 07:50:33 AM 1105 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 02:28:34 AM 1006 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 08:20:34 AM 945 Views
Well, you may, but I remain unconvinced . - 08/10/2009 12:22:31 AM 1069 Views
I think it's too risky - 03/10/2009 07:21:51 PM 1021 Views
Of course, they should still be guarded with restricted access. - 03/10/2009 09:02:21 PM 1078 Views
Re: I think it's too risky - 05/10/2009 04:51:17 AM 928 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 04:51:58 AM 1134 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 02:06:51 PM 987 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 05:45:16 PM 1752 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 07:20:58 PM 1002 Views
To Clarify... - 05/10/2009 12:30:28 AM 1098 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 05/10/2009 02:54:40 PM 1624 Views
Remember Shadar Logoth - 04/10/2009 02:49:06 PM 883 Views
Re: Remember Shadar Logoth - 05/10/2009 06:05:54 AM 1002 Views
From Rand's viewpoint - 05/10/2009 01:10:18 PM 1706 Views

Reply to Message