Active Users:687 Time:03/08/2026 08:55:36 AM
Is this the real stilling? Etzel Send a noteboard - 04/10/2009 09:06:32 AM
I think in these examples you cited the channelers lost their ability to channel, because someone else violently broke a weave (especially a shield) by them, while they were channeling. This obviously doesn't seem to be the "officially" precise stilling weave, but rather like a forced explosion of the ability to channel (in this respect rather similar to burning out). However, this form of stilling someone seems quite risky, because it requires that your opponent channels, and it probably might kill him.

I only dimly remember this, but doesn't Siuan even indicate that she was stilled by a circle of AS in a process that took some time. So, apparently the real stilling is a bit more complicated, because it's basically a very delicate "surgically" removal of the ability to channel.

Since Rand & Co. likely don't know how this exactly works (or e.g. Cadsuane doesn't want to give it away), it would explain why they don't do it.
Reply to message
Still the Darkfriends. - 03/10/2009 05:25:29 PM 2382 Views
ya this does work - 03/10/2009 06:32:22 PM 932 Views
Totally Agree. *NM* - 03/10/2009 06:38:27 PM 481 Views
Makes sense, but... - 03/10/2009 07:04:27 PM 1096 Views
Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know how - 03/10/2009 07:16:03 PM 1340 Views
Is this the real stilling? - 04/10/2009 09:06:32 AM 1469 Views
It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 02:55:35 PM 1056 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:46:58 PM 1610 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:53:52 PM 1084 Views
I think Egwene took longer because it was the first time. *NM* - 04/10/2009 07:20:26 PM 450 Views
Not in my opinion - 05/10/2009 05:00:30 AM 1338 Views
How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 05:15:57 AM 904 Views
Re: How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 09:07:16 PM 966 Views
Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 12:20:21 AM 889 Views
Re: Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 07:30:04 AM 1009 Views
I disagree. - 04/10/2009 10:03:56 PM 971 Views
Re: I disagree. - 05/10/2009 04:58:04 AM 1021 Views
Then... - 05/10/2009 05:12:45 AM 928 Views
Re: Then... - 05/10/2009 09:09:04 PM 931 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 12:25:22 AM 1032 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 07:51:48 AM 944 Views
I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 02:18:01 AM 992 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 07:50:33 AM 1154 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 02:28:34 AM 1048 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 08:20:34 AM 986 Views
Well, you may, but I remain unconvinced . - 08/10/2009 12:22:31 AM 1099 Views
I think it's too risky - 03/10/2009 07:21:51 PM 1051 Views
Of course, they should still be guarded with restricted access. - 03/10/2009 09:02:21 PM 1118 Views
Re: I think it's too risky - 05/10/2009 04:51:17 AM 963 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 04:51:58 AM 1180 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 02:06:51 PM 1022 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 05:45:16 PM 1792 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 07:20:58 PM 1043 Views
To Clarify... - 05/10/2009 12:30:28 AM 1134 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 05/10/2009 02:54:40 PM 1665 Views
Remember Shadar Logoth - 04/10/2009 02:49:06 PM 923 Views
Re: Remember Shadar Logoth - 05/10/2009 06:05:54 AM 1036 Views
From Rand's viewpoint - 05/10/2009 01:10:18 PM 1744 Views

Reply to Message