I think in these examples you cited the channelers lost their ability to channel, because someone else violently broke a weave (especially a shield) by them, while they were channeling. This obviously doesn't seem to be the "officially" precise stilling weave, but rather like a forced explosion of the ability to channel (in this respect rather similar to burning out). However, this form of stilling someone seems quite risky, because it requires that your opponent channels, and it probably might kill him.
I only dimly remember this, but doesn't Siuan even indicate that she was stilled by a circle of AS in a process that took some time. So, apparently the real stilling is a bit more complicated, because it's basically a very delicate "surgically" removal of the ability to channel.
Since Rand & Co. likely don't know how this exactly works (or e.g. Cadsuane doesn't want to give it away), it would explain why they don't do it.
I only dimly remember this, but doesn't Siuan even indicate that she was stilled by a circle of AS in a process that took some time. So, apparently the real stilling is a bit more complicated, because it's basically a very delicate "surgically" removal of the ability to channel.
Since Rand & Co. likely don't know how this exactly works (or e.g. Cadsuane doesn't want to give it away), it would explain why they don't do it.
Still the Darkfriends.
- 03/10/2009 05:25:29 PM
2305 Views
Makes sense, but...
- 03/10/2009 07:04:27 PM
1039 Views
Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know how
- 03/10/2009 07:16:03 PM
1258 Views
Re: Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know h
- 04/10/2009 12:55:55 AM
1536 Views
Is this the real stilling?
- 04/10/2009 09:06:32 AM
1391 Views
It's real stilling
- 04/10/2009 02:55:35 PM
992 Views
Re: It's real stilling
- 04/10/2009 06:46:58 PM
1550 Views
Re: It's real stilling
- 04/10/2009 06:53:52 PM
1023 Views
I think Egwene took longer because it was the first time. *NM*
- 04/10/2009 07:20:26 PM
413 Views
Not in my opinion
- 05/10/2009 05:00:30 AM
1280 Views
How does that respond to what I said?
- 05/10/2009 05:15:57 AM
840 Views
Re: How does that respond to what I said?
- 05/10/2009 09:07:16 PM
895 Views
I disagree.
- 04/10/2009 10:03:56 PM
916 Views
Re: I disagree.
- 05/10/2009 04:58:04 AM
956 Views
Then...
- 05/10/2009 05:12:45 AM
856 Views
Re: Then...
- 05/10/2009 09:09:04 PM
860 Views
I'd like you to clear this up...
- 06/10/2009 02:18:01 AM
918 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up...
- 06/10/2009 07:50:33 AM
1070 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up...
- 07/10/2009 02:28:34 AM
976 Views
Sounds good, but the Aes Sedai aren't known for making the most logical decisions. Nice Post *NM*
- 03/10/2009 07:47:36 PM
440 Views
oops i meant to put "aren't" but i accidently put are. It's edited now. Sorry for any confusion
*NM*
- 03/10/2009 10:26:50 PM
433 Views
*NM*
- 03/10/2009 10:26:50 PM
433 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends.
- 04/10/2009 04:51:58 AM
1103 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends.
- 04/10/2009 02:06:51 PM
961 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends.
- 04/10/2009 05:45:16 PM
1716 Views
Remember Shadar Logoth
- 04/10/2009 02:49:06 PM
858 Views
The only thing worse than ignoring morality for pragmatism is moralizing a non-moral issue
- 04/10/2009 09:36:43 PM
990 Views
The only thing worse than ignoring morality for pragmatism is moralizing a non-moral issue
- 04/10/2009 09:36:43 PM
990 Views

.