Active Users:626 Time:02/02/2026 11:44:53 AM
It's real stilling Sidious Send a noteboard - 04/10/2009 02:55:35 PM
I think in these examples you cited the channelers lost their ability to channel, because someone else violently broke a weave (especially a shield) by them, while they were channeling. This obviously doesn't seem to be the "officially" precise stilling weave, but rather like a forced explosion of the ability to channel (in this respect rather similar to burning out). However, this form of stilling someone seems quite risky, because it requires that your opponent channels, and it probably might kill him.

I only dimly remember this, but doesn't Siuan even indicate that she was stilled by a circle of AS in a process that took some time. So, apparently the real stilling is a bit more complicated, because it's basically a very delicate "surgically" removal of the ability to channel.

Since Rand & Co. likely don't know how this exactly works (or e.g. Cadsuane doesn't want to give it away), it would explain why they don't do it.


From Nynaeve's PoV in TSR it shows that it is a very sharp shield which permanently destroys your ability to channel. Egwene describes hers as a powerful and sharp shield too when she stills Amico. It doesn't require channeling... it merely requires a powerful channeler who is capable of precision weaving.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Reply to message
Still the Darkfriends. - 03/10/2009 05:25:29 PM 2249 Views
ya this does work - 03/10/2009 06:32:22 PM 826 Views
Totally Agree. *NM* - 03/10/2009 06:38:27 PM 419 Views
Makes sense, but... - 03/10/2009 07:04:27 PM 980 Views
Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know how - 03/10/2009 07:16:03 PM 1218 Views
Is this the real stilling? - 04/10/2009 09:06:32 AM 1332 Views
It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 02:55:35 PM 940 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:46:58 PM 1502 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:53:52 PM 971 Views
I think Egwene took longer because it was the first time. *NM* - 04/10/2009 07:20:26 PM 390 Views
Not in my opinion - 05/10/2009 05:00:30 AM 1223 Views
How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 05:15:57 AM 790 Views
Re: How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 09:07:16 PM 844 Views
Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 12:20:21 AM 776 Views
Re: Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 07:30:04 AM 872 Views
I disagree. - 04/10/2009 10:03:56 PM 873 Views
Re: I disagree. - 05/10/2009 04:58:04 AM 907 Views
Then... - 05/10/2009 05:12:45 AM 797 Views
Re: Then... - 05/10/2009 09:09:04 PM 810 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 12:25:22 AM 897 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 07:51:48 AM 817 Views
I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 02:18:01 AM 866 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 07:50:33 AM 1023 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 02:28:34 AM 921 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 08:20:34 AM 854 Views
Well, you may, but I remain unconvinced . - 08/10/2009 12:22:31 AM 977 Views
I think it's too risky - 03/10/2009 07:21:51 PM 945 Views
Of course, they should still be guarded with restricted access. - 03/10/2009 09:02:21 PM 1003 Views
Re: I think it's too risky - 05/10/2009 04:51:17 AM 845 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 04:51:58 AM 1050 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 02:06:51 PM 903 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 05:45:16 PM 1662 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 07:20:58 PM 925 Views
To Clarify... - 05/10/2009 12:30:28 AM 1009 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 05/10/2009 02:54:40 PM 1538 Views
Remember Shadar Logoth - 04/10/2009 02:49:06 PM 817 Views
Re: Remember Shadar Logoth - 05/10/2009 06:05:54 AM 927 Views
From Rand's viewpoint - 05/10/2009 01:10:18 PM 1626 Views

Reply to Message