Active Users:1272 Time:03/05/2026 11:16:42 PM
It's real stilling Sidious Send a noteboard - 04/10/2009 02:55:35 PM
I think in these examples you cited the channelers lost their ability to channel, because someone else violently broke a weave (especially a shield) by them, while they were channeling. This obviously doesn't seem to be the "officially" precise stilling weave, but rather like a forced explosion of the ability to channel (in this respect rather similar to burning out). However, this form of stilling someone seems quite risky, because it requires that your opponent channels, and it probably might kill him.

I only dimly remember this, but doesn't Siuan even indicate that she was stilled by a circle of AS in a process that took some time. So, apparently the real stilling is a bit more complicated, because it's basically a very delicate "surgically" removal of the ability to channel.

Since Rand & Co. likely don't know how this exactly works (or e.g. Cadsuane doesn't want to give it away), it would explain why they don't do it.


From Nynaeve's PoV in TSR it shows that it is a very sharp shield which permanently destroys your ability to channel. Egwene describes hers as a powerful and sharp shield too when she stills Amico. It doesn't require channeling... it merely requires a powerful channeler who is capable of precision weaving.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Reply to message
Still the Darkfriends. - 03/10/2009 05:25:29 PM 2305 Views
ya this does work - 03/10/2009 06:32:22 PM 877 Views
Totally Agree. *NM* - 03/10/2009 06:38:27 PM 442 Views
Makes sense, but... - 03/10/2009 07:04:27 PM 1039 Views
Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know how - 03/10/2009 07:16:03 PM 1258 Views
Is this the real stilling? - 04/10/2009 09:06:32 AM 1390 Views
It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 02:55:35 PM 992 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:46:58 PM 1549 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:53:52 PM 1022 Views
I think Egwene took longer because it was the first time. *NM* - 04/10/2009 07:20:26 PM 413 Views
Not in my opinion - 05/10/2009 05:00:30 AM 1280 Views
How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 05:15:57 AM 840 Views
Re: How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 09:07:16 PM 895 Views
Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 12:20:21 AM 822 Views
Re: Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 07:30:04 AM 931 Views
I disagree. - 04/10/2009 10:03:56 PM 915 Views
Re: I disagree. - 05/10/2009 04:58:04 AM 956 Views
Then... - 05/10/2009 05:12:45 AM 856 Views
Re: Then... - 05/10/2009 09:09:04 PM 859 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 12:25:22 AM 959 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 07:51:48 AM 869 Views
I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 02:18:01 AM 918 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 07:50:33 AM 1070 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 02:28:34 AM 976 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 08:20:34 AM 910 Views
Well, you may, but I remain unconvinced . - 08/10/2009 12:22:31 AM 1041 Views
I think it's too risky - 03/10/2009 07:21:51 PM 989 Views
Of course, they should still be guarded with restricted access. - 03/10/2009 09:02:21 PM 1053 Views
Re: I think it's too risky - 05/10/2009 04:51:17 AM 899 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 04:51:58 AM 1103 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 02:06:51 PM 961 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 05:45:16 PM 1716 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 07:20:58 PM 975 Views
To Clarify... - 05/10/2009 12:30:28 AM 1069 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 05/10/2009 02:54:40 PM 1585 Views
Remember Shadar Logoth - 04/10/2009 02:49:06 PM 858 Views
Re: Remember Shadar Logoth - 05/10/2009 06:05:54 AM 976 Views
From Rand's viewpoint - 05/10/2009 01:10:18 PM 1677 Views

Reply to Message