Active Users:450 Time:18/06/2025 07:35:28 AM
It's real stilling Sidious Send a noteboard - 04/10/2009 02:55:35 PM
I think in these examples you cited the channelers lost their ability to channel, because someone else violently broke a weave (especially a shield) by them, while they were channeling. This obviously doesn't seem to be the "officially" precise stilling weave, but rather like a forced explosion of the ability to channel (in this respect rather similar to burning out). However, this form of stilling someone seems quite risky, because it requires that your opponent channels, and it probably might kill him.

I only dimly remember this, but doesn't Siuan even indicate that she was stilled by a circle of AS in a process that took some time. So, apparently the real stilling is a bit more complicated, because it's basically a very delicate "surgically" removal of the ability to channel.

Since Rand & Co. likely don't know how this exactly works (or e.g. Cadsuane doesn't want to give it away), it would explain why they don't do it.


From Nynaeve's PoV in TSR it shows that it is a very sharp shield which permanently destroys your ability to channel. Egwene describes hers as a powerful and sharp shield too when she stills Amico. It doesn't require channeling... it merely requires a powerful channeler who is capable of precision weaving.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Reply to message
Still the Darkfriends. - 03/10/2009 05:25:29 PM 2092 Views
ya this does work - 03/10/2009 06:32:22 PM 685 Views
Totally Agree. *NM* - 03/10/2009 06:38:27 PM 351 Views
Makes sense, but... - 03/10/2009 07:04:27 PM 833 Views
Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know how - 03/10/2009 07:16:03 PM 1079 Views
Is this the real stilling? - 04/10/2009 09:06:32 AM 1193 Views
It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 02:55:35 PM 801 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:46:58 PM 1358 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:53:52 PM 809 Views
I think Egwene took longer because it was the first time. *NM* - 04/10/2009 07:20:26 PM 316 Views
Not in my opinion - 05/10/2009 05:00:30 AM 1096 Views
How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 05:15:57 AM 672 Views
Re: How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 09:07:16 PM 700 Views
Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 12:20:21 AM 643 Views
Re: Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 07:30:04 AM 708 Views
I disagree. - 04/10/2009 10:03:56 PM 753 Views
Re: I disagree. - 05/10/2009 04:58:04 AM 768 Views
Then... - 05/10/2009 05:12:45 AM 668 Views
Re: Then... - 05/10/2009 09:09:04 PM 685 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 12:25:22 AM 740 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 07:51:48 AM 687 Views
I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 02:18:01 AM 721 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 07:50:33 AM 891 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 02:28:34 AM 775 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 08:20:34 AM 715 Views
Well, you may, but I remain unconvinced . - 08/10/2009 12:22:31 AM 823 Views
I think it's too risky - 03/10/2009 07:21:51 PM 798 Views
Of course, they should still be guarded with restricted access. - 03/10/2009 09:02:21 PM 851 Views
Re: I think it's too risky - 05/10/2009 04:51:17 AM 679 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 04:51:58 AM 906 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 02:06:51 PM 755 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 05:45:16 PM 1473 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 07:20:58 PM 767 Views
To Clarify... - 05/10/2009 12:30:28 AM 847 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 05/10/2009 02:54:40 PM 1388 Views
Remember Shadar Logoth - 04/10/2009 02:49:06 PM 681 Views
Re: Remember Shadar Logoth - 05/10/2009 06:05:54 AM 797 Views
From Rand's viewpoint - 05/10/2009 01:10:18 PM 1467 Views

Reply to Message