Active Users:2282 Time:18/06/2026 04:16:45 AM
The only thing worse than ignoring morality for pragmatism is moralizing a non-moral issue Cannoli Send a noteboard - 04/10/2009 09:36:43 PM
Carrying out a punishment because its convienent doesn't make it right. It boils down to a case of becoming no better then your enemies. Aridhol learned that lesson the hard way.
And what is wrong with stilling? It is not a bad thing. I was not advocating kill on sight, and I was fairly sure that my reference to the ability to Heal severing made it clear that I mean this tactic is acceptable NOW that it is a temporary restriction/punishment. If it can be so easily undone, what is the problem? Is robbing them of their free will by Compelling them with the Oath Rod to serve and obey their captors worse than taking away their ability when the ability to restore it is generally known? Severing someone now that it can be Healed with no permanent loss is no more immoral than taking away a knife or sword from a captive.
Cannoli
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless

“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
Reply to message
Still the Darkfriends. - 03/10/2009 05:25:29 PM 2334 Views
ya this does work - 03/10/2009 06:32:22 PM 900 Views
Totally Agree. *NM* - 03/10/2009 06:38:27 PM 457 Views
Makes sense, but... - 03/10/2009 07:04:27 PM 1068 Views
Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know how - 03/10/2009 07:16:03 PM 1289 Views
Is this the real stilling? - 04/10/2009 09:06:32 AM 1425 Views
It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 02:55:35 PM 1018 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:46:58 PM 1580 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:53:52 PM 1047 Views
I think Egwene took longer because it was the first time. *NM* - 04/10/2009 07:20:26 PM 431 Views
Not in my opinion - 05/10/2009 05:00:30 AM 1306 Views
How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 05:15:57 AM 871 Views
Re: How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 09:07:16 PM 924 Views
Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 12:20:21 AM 847 Views
Re: Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 07:30:04 AM 961 Views
I disagree. - 04/10/2009 10:03:56 PM 942 Views
Re: I disagree. - 05/10/2009 04:58:04 AM 985 Views
Then... - 05/10/2009 05:12:45 AM 892 Views
Re: Then... - 05/10/2009 09:09:04 PM 892 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 12:25:22 AM 995 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 07:51:48 AM 900 Views
I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 02:18:01 AM 952 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 07:50:33 AM 1102 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 02:28:34 AM 1005 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 08:20:34 AM 945 Views
Well, you may, but I remain unconvinced . - 08/10/2009 12:22:31 AM 1068 Views
I think it's too risky - 03/10/2009 07:21:51 PM 1021 Views
Of course, they should still be guarded with restricted access. - 03/10/2009 09:02:21 PM 1077 Views
Re: I think it's too risky - 05/10/2009 04:51:17 AM 927 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 04:51:58 AM 1134 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 02:06:51 PM 986 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 05:45:16 PM 1752 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 07:20:58 PM 1002 Views
To Clarify... - 05/10/2009 12:30:28 AM 1097 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 05/10/2009 02:54:40 PM 1624 Views
Remember Shadar Logoth - 04/10/2009 02:49:06 PM 883 Views
The only thing worse than ignoring morality for pragmatism is moralizing a non-moral issue - 04/10/2009 09:36:43 PM 1019 Views
Re: Remember Shadar Logoth - 05/10/2009 06:05:54 AM 1002 Views
From Rand's viewpoint - 05/10/2009 01:10:18 PM 1705 Views

Reply to Message