Active Users:2046 Time:04/05/2026 12:53:34 AM
The only thing worse than ignoring morality for pragmatism is moralizing a non-moral issue Cannoli Send a noteboard - 04/10/2009 09:36:43 PM
Carrying out a punishment because its convienent doesn't make it right. It boils down to a case of becoming no better then your enemies. Aridhol learned that lesson the hard way.
And what is wrong with stilling? It is not a bad thing. I was not advocating kill on sight, and I was fairly sure that my reference to the ability to Heal severing made it clear that I mean this tactic is acceptable NOW that it is a temporary restriction/punishment. If it can be so easily undone, what is the problem? Is robbing them of their free will by Compelling them with the Oath Rod to serve and obey their captors worse than taking away their ability when the ability to restore it is generally known? Severing someone now that it can be Healed with no permanent loss is no more immoral than taking away a knife or sword from a captive.
Cannoli
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless

“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
Reply to message
Still the Darkfriends. - 03/10/2009 05:25:29 PM 2305 Views
ya this does work - 03/10/2009 06:32:22 PM 879 Views
Totally Agree. *NM* - 03/10/2009 06:38:27 PM 442 Views
Makes sense, but... - 03/10/2009 07:04:27 PM 1040 Views
Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know how - 03/10/2009 07:16:03 PM 1260 Views
Is this the real stilling? - 04/10/2009 09:06:32 AM 1392 Views
It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 02:55:35 PM 993 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:46:58 PM 1550 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:53:52 PM 1024 Views
I think Egwene took longer because it was the first time. *NM* - 04/10/2009 07:20:26 PM 413 Views
Not in my opinion - 05/10/2009 05:00:30 AM 1281 Views
How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 05:15:57 AM 841 Views
Re: How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 09:07:16 PM 897 Views
Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 12:20:21 AM 824 Views
Re: Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 07:30:04 AM 933 Views
I disagree. - 04/10/2009 10:03:56 PM 917 Views
Re: I disagree. - 05/10/2009 04:58:04 AM 957 Views
Then... - 05/10/2009 05:12:45 AM 857 Views
Re: Then... - 05/10/2009 09:09:04 PM 861 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 12:25:22 AM 961 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 07:51:48 AM 871 Views
I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 02:18:01 AM 919 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 07:50:33 AM 1072 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 02:28:34 AM 977 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 08:20:34 AM 911 Views
Well, you may, but I remain unconvinced . - 08/10/2009 12:22:31 AM 1043 Views
I think it's too risky - 03/10/2009 07:21:51 PM 991 Views
Of course, they should still be guarded with restricted access. - 03/10/2009 09:02:21 PM 1054 Views
Re: I think it's too risky - 05/10/2009 04:51:17 AM 900 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 04:51:58 AM 1106 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 02:06:51 PM 962 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 05:45:16 PM 1716 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 07:20:58 PM 976 Views
To Clarify... - 05/10/2009 12:30:28 AM 1071 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 05/10/2009 02:54:40 PM 1586 Views
Remember Shadar Logoth - 04/10/2009 02:49:06 PM 859 Views
The only thing worse than ignoring morality for pragmatism is moralizing a non-moral issue - 04/10/2009 09:36:43 PM 992 Views
Re: Remember Shadar Logoth - 05/10/2009 06:05:54 AM 977 Views
From Rand's viewpoint - 05/10/2009 01:10:18 PM 1678 Views

Reply to Message