Active Users:391 Time:18/06/2025 08:07:09 AM
The only thing worse than ignoring morality for pragmatism is moralizing a non-moral issue Cannoli Send a noteboard - 04/10/2009 09:36:43 PM
Carrying out a punishment because its convienent doesn't make it right. It boils down to a case of becoming no better then your enemies. Aridhol learned that lesson the hard way.
And what is wrong with stilling? It is not a bad thing. I was not advocating kill on sight, and I was fairly sure that my reference to the ability to Heal severing made it clear that I mean this tactic is acceptable NOW that it is a temporary restriction/punishment. If it can be so easily undone, what is the problem? Is robbing them of their free will by Compelling them with the Oath Rod to serve and obey their captors worse than taking away their ability when the ability to restore it is generally known? Severing someone now that it can be Healed with no permanent loss is no more immoral than taking away a knife or sword from a captive.
Cannoli
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless

“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
Reply to message
Still the Darkfriends. - 03/10/2009 05:25:29 PM 2092 Views
ya this does work - 03/10/2009 06:32:22 PM 686 Views
Totally Agree. *NM* - 03/10/2009 06:38:27 PM 351 Views
Makes sense, but... - 03/10/2009 07:04:27 PM 833 Views
Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know how - 03/10/2009 07:16:03 PM 1080 Views
Is this the real stilling? - 04/10/2009 09:06:32 AM 1193 Views
It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 02:55:35 PM 802 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:46:58 PM 1358 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:53:52 PM 810 Views
I think Egwene took longer because it was the first time. *NM* - 04/10/2009 07:20:26 PM 316 Views
Not in my opinion - 05/10/2009 05:00:30 AM 1096 Views
How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 05:15:57 AM 672 Views
Re: How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 09:07:16 PM 700 Views
Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 12:20:21 AM 644 Views
Re: Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 07:30:04 AM 708 Views
I disagree. - 04/10/2009 10:03:56 PM 754 Views
Re: I disagree. - 05/10/2009 04:58:04 AM 769 Views
Then... - 05/10/2009 05:12:45 AM 669 Views
Re: Then... - 05/10/2009 09:09:04 PM 686 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 12:25:22 AM 740 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 07:51:48 AM 687 Views
I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 02:18:01 AM 722 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 07:50:33 AM 891 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 02:28:34 AM 776 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 08:20:34 AM 715 Views
Well, you may, but I remain unconvinced . - 08/10/2009 12:22:31 AM 824 Views
I think it's too risky - 03/10/2009 07:21:51 PM 799 Views
Of course, they should still be guarded with restricted access. - 03/10/2009 09:02:21 PM 851 Views
Re: I think it's too risky - 05/10/2009 04:51:17 AM 680 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 04:51:58 AM 907 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 02:06:51 PM 756 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 05:45:16 PM 1473 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 07:20:58 PM 768 Views
To Clarify... - 05/10/2009 12:30:28 AM 848 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 05/10/2009 02:54:40 PM 1388 Views
Remember Shadar Logoth - 04/10/2009 02:49:06 PM 682 Views
The only thing worse than ignoring morality for pragmatism is moralizing a non-moral issue - 04/10/2009 09:36:43 PM 793 Views
Re: Remember Shadar Logoth - 05/10/2009 06:05:54 AM 798 Views
From Rand's viewpoint - 05/10/2009 01:10:18 PM 1468 Views

Reply to Message