Active Users:1301 Time:03/05/2026 11:16:01 PM
The only thing worse than ignoring morality for pragmatism is moralizing a non-moral issue Cannoli Send a noteboard - 04/10/2009 09:36:43 PM
Carrying out a punishment because its convienent doesn't make it right. It boils down to a case of becoming no better then your enemies. Aridhol learned that lesson the hard way.
And what is wrong with stilling? It is not a bad thing. I was not advocating kill on sight, and I was fairly sure that my reference to the ability to Heal severing made it clear that I mean this tactic is acceptable NOW that it is a temporary restriction/punishment. If it can be so easily undone, what is the problem? Is robbing them of their free will by Compelling them with the Oath Rod to serve and obey their captors worse than taking away their ability when the ability to restore it is generally known? Severing someone now that it can be Healed with no permanent loss is no more immoral than taking away a knife or sword from a captive.
Cannoli
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless

“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
Reply to message
Still the Darkfriends. - 03/10/2009 05:25:29 PM 2305 Views
ya this does work - 03/10/2009 06:32:22 PM 877 Views
Totally Agree. *NM* - 03/10/2009 06:38:27 PM 442 Views
Makes sense, but... - 03/10/2009 07:04:27 PM 1038 Views
Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know how - 03/10/2009 07:16:03 PM 1258 Views
Is this the real stilling? - 04/10/2009 09:06:32 AM 1390 Views
It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 02:55:35 PM 991 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:46:58 PM 1549 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:53:52 PM 1022 Views
I think Egwene took longer because it was the first time. *NM* - 04/10/2009 07:20:26 PM 413 Views
Not in my opinion - 05/10/2009 05:00:30 AM 1280 Views
How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 05:15:57 AM 840 Views
Re: How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 09:07:16 PM 895 Views
Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 12:20:21 AM 822 Views
Re: Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 07:30:04 AM 931 Views
I disagree. - 04/10/2009 10:03:56 PM 915 Views
Re: I disagree. - 05/10/2009 04:58:04 AM 955 Views
Then... - 05/10/2009 05:12:45 AM 856 Views
Re: Then... - 05/10/2009 09:09:04 PM 859 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 12:25:22 AM 959 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 07:51:48 AM 869 Views
I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 02:18:01 AM 918 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 07:50:33 AM 1070 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 02:28:34 AM 976 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 08:20:34 AM 909 Views
Well, you may, but I remain unconvinced . - 08/10/2009 12:22:31 AM 1040 Views
I think it's too risky - 03/10/2009 07:21:51 PM 989 Views
Of course, they should still be guarded with restricted access. - 03/10/2009 09:02:21 PM 1053 Views
Re: I think it's too risky - 05/10/2009 04:51:17 AM 898 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 04:51:58 AM 1103 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 02:06:51 PM 960 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 05:45:16 PM 1716 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 07:20:58 PM 975 Views
To Clarify... - 05/10/2009 12:30:28 AM 1068 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 05/10/2009 02:54:40 PM 1585 Views
Remember Shadar Logoth - 04/10/2009 02:49:06 PM 858 Views
The only thing worse than ignoring morality for pragmatism is moralizing a non-moral issue - 04/10/2009 09:36:43 PM 990 Views
Re: Remember Shadar Logoth - 05/10/2009 06:05:54 AM 976 Views
From Rand's viewpoint - 05/10/2009 01:10:18 PM 1676 Views

Reply to Message