Active Users:1553 Time:19/09/2026 11:32:46 AM
The only thing worse than ignoring morality for pragmatism is moralizing a non-moral issue Cannoli Send a noteboard - 04/10/2009 09:36:43 PM
Carrying out a punishment because its convienent doesn't make it right. It boils down to a case of becoming no better then your enemies. Aridhol learned that lesson the hard way.
And what is wrong with stilling? It is not a bad thing. I was not advocating kill on sight, and I was fairly sure that my reference to the ability to Heal severing made it clear that I mean this tactic is acceptable NOW that it is a temporary restriction/punishment. If it can be so easily undone, what is the problem? Is robbing them of their free will by Compelling them with the Oath Rod to serve and obey their captors worse than taking away their ability when the ability to restore it is generally known? Severing someone now that it can be Healed with no permanent loss is no more immoral than taking away a knife or sword from a captive.
Cannoli
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless

“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
Reply to message
Still the Darkfriends. - 03/10/2009 05:25:29 PM 2417 Views
ya this does work - 03/10/2009 06:32:22 PM 952 Views
Totally Agree. *NM* - 03/10/2009 06:38:27 PM 497 Views
Makes sense, but... - 03/10/2009 07:04:27 PM 1118 Views
Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know how - 03/10/2009 07:16:03 PM 1368 Views
Is this the real stilling? - 04/10/2009 09:06:32 AM 1498 Views
It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 02:55:35 PM 1082 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:46:58 PM 1637 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:53:52 PM 1111 Views
I think Egwene took longer because it was the first time. *NM* - 04/10/2009 07:20:26 PM 462 Views
Not in my opinion - 05/10/2009 05:00:30 AM 1359 Views
How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 05:15:57 AM 927 Views
Re: How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 09:07:16 PM 990 Views
Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 12:20:21 AM 907 Views
Re: Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 07:30:04 AM 1033 Views
I disagree. - 04/10/2009 10:03:56 PM 995 Views
Re: I disagree. - 05/10/2009 04:58:04 AM 1042 Views
Then... - 05/10/2009 05:12:45 AM 949 Views
Re: Then... - 05/10/2009 09:09:04 PM 951 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 12:25:22 AM 1059 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 07:51:48 AM 968 Views
I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 02:18:01 AM 1028 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 07:50:33 AM 1179 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 02:28:34 AM 1075 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 08:20:34 AM 1010 Views
Well, you may, but I remain unconvinced . - 08/10/2009 12:22:31 AM 1129 Views
I think it's too risky - 03/10/2009 07:21:51 PM 1072 Views
Of course, they should still be guarded with restricted access. - 03/10/2009 09:02:21 PM 1142 Views
Re: I think it's too risky - 05/10/2009 04:51:17 AM 989 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 04:51:58 AM 1213 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 02:06:51 PM 1049 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 05:45:16 PM 1823 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 07:20:58 PM 1067 Views
To Clarify... - 05/10/2009 12:30:28 AM 1153 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 05/10/2009 02:54:40 PM 1703 Views
Remember Shadar Logoth - 04/10/2009 02:49:06 PM 947 Views
The only thing worse than ignoring morality for pragmatism is moralizing a non-moral issue - 04/10/2009 09:36:43 PM 1101 Views
Re: Remember Shadar Logoth - 05/10/2009 06:05:54 AM 1066 Views
From Rand's viewpoint - 05/10/2009 01:10:18 PM 1765 Views

Reply to Message