In my original post I said that stilling requires a channeler capable of precision weaving i.e. razor sharp flows. There is no evidence that a channeler weaker than Egwene or Elayne can pull off such deft weaves (and there are many quotes available on this issue), and thus Moiraine couldn't either.
I'd like evidence that severing requires precision weaving. Not that I'm sure what precision weaving is either. Is this about that female-strength bit?
Also, are you saying there's no evidence that women weaker than Egwene or Elayne can sever channelers? 'Cause that'd be pretty ridiculous. Not only have the Tower been severing people long before channelers of the wondergirls' strength level came along, but if you count the illegal gentling of men following the Aiel War, you have typical pre-EotW strength women severing male channelers (typically stronger than the average women, to say nothing of 'Morgase or Sorilea'
and surely without a large circle - there is no way that you could gather, say, thirteen extremist Reds together outside the Tower any time you wanted to perform an illegal gentling.
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter
Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
~Master Splinter
Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Still the Darkfriends.
- 03/10/2009 05:25:29 PM
2203 Views
Makes sense, but...
- 03/10/2009 07:04:27 PM
943 Views
Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know how
- 03/10/2009 07:16:03 PM
1186 Views
Re: Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know h
- 04/10/2009 12:55:55 AM
1449 Views
Is this the real stilling?
- 04/10/2009 09:06:32 AM
1288 Views
It's real stilling
- 04/10/2009 02:55:35 PM
901 Views
Re: It's real stilling
- 04/10/2009 06:46:58 PM
1466 Views
Re: It's real stilling
- 04/10/2009 06:53:52 PM
933 Views
I think Egwene took longer because it was the first time. *NM*
- 04/10/2009 07:20:26 PM
373 Views
Not in my opinion
- 05/10/2009 05:00:30 AM
1185 Views
How does that respond to what I said?
- 05/10/2009 05:15:57 AM
756 Views
Re: How does that respond to what I said?
- 05/10/2009 09:07:16 PM
809 Views
I disagree.
- 04/10/2009 10:03:56 PM
840 Views
Re: I disagree.
- 05/10/2009 04:58:04 AM
873 Views
Then...
- 05/10/2009 05:12:45 AM
761 Views
Re: Then...
- 05/10/2009 09:09:04 PM
770 Views
I'd like you to clear this up...
- 06/10/2009 02:18:01 AM
831 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up...
- 06/10/2009 07:50:33 AM
990 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up...
- 07/10/2009 02:28:34 AM
885 Views
Sounds good, but the Aes Sedai aren't known for making the most logical decisions. Nice Post *NM*
- 03/10/2009 07:47:36 PM
408 Views
oops i meant to put "aren't" but i accidently put are. It's edited now. Sorry for any confusion
*NM*
- 03/10/2009 10:26:50 PM
395 Views
*NM*
- 03/10/2009 10:26:50 PM
395 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends.
- 04/10/2009 04:51:58 AM
1019 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends.
- 04/10/2009 02:06:51 PM
869 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends.
- 04/10/2009 05:45:16 PM
1626 Views
Remember Shadar Logoth
- 04/10/2009 02:49:06 PM
790 Views
The only thing worse than ignoring morality for pragmatism is moralizing a non-moral issue
- 04/10/2009 09:36:43 PM
903 Views
The only thing worse than ignoring morality for pragmatism is moralizing a non-moral issue
- 04/10/2009 09:36:43 PM
903 Views
