Active Users:778 Time:15/12/2025 02:25:08 AM
Yes, but... Logain Send a noteboard - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM
Basically, you can't prove that there is a connection between how Graendal died and how Asmodean died, especially since it seems no amount of balefire can remove a month or more from the Pattern. Rand used an incredible amount of saidin, more than anyone else could use unaided, and all he could manage was 15 minutes burned from the Pattern. Basically, Asmodean wouldn't come back even if Graendal was hit with balefire because he was killed too long ago.

And, even moreso, B.S. says nothing about the identity of Asmodean's killer.



Graendal cannot reveal herself as Asmodean's killer directly (because she is balefired) or indirectly (by Asmodean reappearing).

Ergo, somebody else killed Asmodean, not Graendal. Somebody else will have to reveal themselves as the killer.
Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 1894 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 838 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 905 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 446 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 876 Views
It eliminates for the following - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 895 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 950 Views
Re: - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 928 Views
You make a faulty assumption - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 871 Views
NO! - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 768 Views
Why? - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 754 Views
Re: Why? - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 782 Views
Logical? - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 780 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 778 Views
I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 729 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 820 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 782 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 805 Views
Yes, but... - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 775 Views
That is still erroneous. - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 750 Views
your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 796 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 784 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 794 Views
I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 875 Views
Re: I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 827 Views
I'm not a writer... - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 808 Views
Agree - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 745 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 804 Views
This logic is lacking as well - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 841 Views
Your comments make sense. - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 708 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 674 Views
Two Things - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 734 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 795 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 413 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 835 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 398 Views
What? Did you double post? - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 715 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 761 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 395 Views
I don't say it's impossible... - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 797 Views
This was done in the series before... - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 708 Views
I meant... - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 782 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 753 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 746 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 371 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 331 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 770 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 760 Views
there was a bit more before it - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 706 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 752 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 399 Views
Maybe I missed something. - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 733 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 356 Views

Reply to Message