Active Users:1119 Time:06/08/2026 09:48:33 PM
Yes, but... Logain Send a noteboard - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM
Basically, you can't prove that there is a connection between how Graendal died and how Asmodean died, especially since it seems no amount of balefire can remove a month or more from the Pattern. Rand used an incredible amount of saidin, more than anyone else could use unaided, and all he could manage was 15 minutes burned from the Pattern. Basically, Asmodean wouldn't come back even if Graendal was hit with balefire because he was killed too long ago.

And, even moreso, B.S. says nothing about the identity of Asmodean's killer.



Graendal cannot reveal herself as Asmodean's killer directly (because she is balefired) or indirectly (by Asmodean reappearing).

Ergo, somebody else killed Asmodean, not Graendal. Somebody else will have to reveal themselves as the killer.
Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 2057 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 998 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 1045 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 521 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 1042 Views
It eliminates for the following - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 1046 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 1095 Views
Re: - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 1071 Views
You make a faulty assumption - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 1010 Views
NO! - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 920 Views
Why? - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 878 Views
Re: Why? - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 936 Views
Logical? - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 926 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 928 Views
I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 876 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 957 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 905 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 948 Views
Yes, but... - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 932 Views
That is still erroneous. - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 901 Views
your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 942 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 942 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 962 Views
I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 1040 Views
Re: I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 1014 Views
I'm not a writer... - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 948 Views
Agree - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 890 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 960 Views
This logic is lacking as well - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 993 Views
Your comments make sense. - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 860 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 836 Views
Two Things - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 887 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 945 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 473 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 984 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 463 Views
What? Did you double post? - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 859 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 917 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 464 Views
I don't say it's impossible... - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 946 Views
This was done in the series before... - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 866 Views
I meant... - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 921 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 894 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 913 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 437 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 396 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 919 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 908 Views
there was a bit more before it - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 848 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 896 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 463 Views
Maybe I missed something. - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 875 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 430 Views

Reply to Message