Active Users:672 Time:08/11/2026 11:45:58 AM
Yes, but... Logain Send a noteboard - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM
Basically, you can't prove that there is a connection between how Graendal died and how Asmodean died, especially since it seems no amount of balefire can remove a month or more from the Pattern. Rand used an incredible amount of saidin, more than anyone else could use unaided, and all he could manage was 15 minutes burned from the Pattern. Basically, Asmodean wouldn't come back even if Graendal was hit with balefire because he was killed too long ago.

And, even moreso, B.S. says nothing about the identity of Asmodean's killer.



Graendal cannot reveal herself as Asmodean's killer directly (because she is balefired) or indirectly (by Asmodean reappearing).

Ergo, somebody else killed Asmodean, not Graendal. Somebody else will have to reveal themselves as the killer.
Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 2125 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 1060 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 1104 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 567 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 1111 Views
It eliminates for the following - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 1106 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 1148 Views
Re: - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 1125 Views
You make a faulty assumption - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 1075 Views
NO! - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 977 Views
Why? - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 936 Views
Re: Why? - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 1003 Views
Logical? - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 981 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 980 Views
I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 948 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 1013 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 964 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 1023 Views
Yes, but... - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 986 Views
That is still erroneous. - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 964 Views
your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 1002 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 1012 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 1020 Views
I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 1101 Views
Re: I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 1084 Views
I'm not a writer... - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 1009 Views
Agree - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 968 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 1013 Views
This logic is lacking as well - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 1060 Views
Your comments make sense. - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 915 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 901 Views
Two Things - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 943 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 1005 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 507 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 1059 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 498 Views
What? Did you double post? - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 922 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 973 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 494 Views
I don't say it's impossible... - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 1002 Views
This was done in the series before... - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 925 Views
I meant... - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 975 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 954 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 972 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 480 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 426 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 982 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 964 Views
there was a bit more before it - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 902 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 949 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 494 Views
Maybe I missed something. - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 929 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 463 Views

Reply to Message