Active Users:784 Time:05/08/2025 10:10:54 PM
Yes, but... Logain Send a noteboard - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM
Basically, you can't prove that there is a connection between how Graendal died and how Asmodean died, especially since it seems no amount of balefire can remove a month or more from the Pattern. Rand used an incredible amount of saidin, more than anyone else could use unaided, and all he could manage was 15 minutes burned from the Pattern. Basically, Asmodean wouldn't come back even if Graendal was hit with balefire because he was killed too long ago.

And, even moreso, B.S. says nothing about the identity of Asmodean's killer.



Graendal cannot reveal herself as Asmodean's killer directly (because she is balefired) or indirectly (by Asmodean reappearing).

Ergo, somebody else killed Asmodean, not Graendal. Somebody else will have to reveal themselves as the killer.
Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 1807 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 764 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 837 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 395 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 773 Views
It eliminates for the following - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 768 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 883 Views
Re: - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 838 Views
You make a faulty assumption - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 782 Views
NO! - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 669 Views
Why? - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 686 Views
Re: Why? - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 704 Views
Logical? - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 700 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 712 Views
I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 663 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 754 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 700 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 710 Views
Yes, but... - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 701 Views
That is still erroneous. - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 668 Views
your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 727 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 694 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 708 Views
I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 789 Views
Re: I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 748 Views
I'm not a writer... - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 749 Views
Agree - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 665 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 707 Views
This logic is lacking as well - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 745 Views
Your comments make sense. - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 611 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 609 Views
Two Things - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 658 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 719 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 368 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 759 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 353 Views
What? Did you double post? - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 639 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 688 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 348 Views
I don't say it's impossible... - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 703 Views
This was done in the series before... - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 632 Views
I meant... - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 717 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 667 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 680 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 325 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 301 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 676 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 678 Views
there was a bit more before it - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 622 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 668 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 350 Views
Maybe I missed something. - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 635 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 302 Views

Reply to Message