Active Users:1133 Time:03/05/2026 11:02:49 PM
Yes, but... Logain Send a noteboard - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM
Basically, you can't prove that there is a connection between how Graendal died and how Asmodean died, especially since it seems no amount of balefire can remove a month or more from the Pattern. Rand used an incredible amount of saidin, more than anyone else could use unaided, and all he could manage was 15 minutes burned from the Pattern. Basically, Asmodean wouldn't come back even if Graendal was hit with balefire because he was killed too long ago.

And, even moreso, B.S. says nothing about the identity of Asmodean's killer.



Graendal cannot reveal herself as Asmodean's killer directly (because she is balefired) or indirectly (by Asmodean reappearing).

Ergo, somebody else killed Asmodean, not Graendal. Somebody else will have to reveal themselves as the killer.
Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 1992 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 927 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 982 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 484 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 971 Views
It eliminates for the following - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 985 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 1035 Views
Re: - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 1011 Views
You make a faulty assumption - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 949 Views
NO! - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 854 Views
Why? - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 828 Views
Re: Why? - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 866 Views
Logical? - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 864 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 862 Views
I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 807 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 903 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 854 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 883 Views
Yes, but... - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 868 Views
That is still erroneous. - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 831 Views
your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 872 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 874 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 888 Views
I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 955 Views
Re: I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 933 Views
I'm not a writer... - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 887 Views
Agree - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 824 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 896 Views
This logic is lacking as well - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 928 Views
Your comments make sense. - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 800 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 769 Views
Two Things - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 828 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 883 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 441 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 922 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 427 Views
What? Did you double post? - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 799 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 858 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 426 Views
I don't say it's impossible... - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 879 Views
This was done in the series before... - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 796 Views
I meant... - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 861 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 830 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 844 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 406 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 363 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 845 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 852 Views
there was a bit more before it - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 789 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 830 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 431 Views
Maybe I missed something. - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 819 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 393 Views

Reply to Message