Active Users:2287 Time:18/06/2026 03:39:19 PM
Re: Your comments make sense. PatAtt Send a noteboard - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM
I approve. =) I still think my comments made more sense than you gave them credit, but I accept your argument as better logic than mine. Well done... I think we can safely lay Asmodean reincarnation/reappearance aside as a possibility.


Absolutely your comments made sense and I apologize if I implied otherwise. I just wanted to show that the math eliminated the possibility no matter how strong the Choeden Kal was because of the number of people. Actually, since many of us are new Brandon Sanderson readers, it is a good idea to parse his words because we DON'T know if he is one of those authors who likes to play Aes Sedai.
Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 2019 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 951 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 1004 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 499 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 995 Views
It eliminates for the following - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 1011 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 1057 Views
Re: - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 1035 Views
You make a faulty assumption - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 975 Views
NO! - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 878 Views
Why? - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 848 Views
Re: Why? - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 892 Views
Logical? - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 886 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 889 Views
I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 827 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 923 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 871 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 904 Views
Yes, but... - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 885 Views
That is still erroneous. - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 855 Views
your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 897 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 901 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 911 Views
I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 985 Views
Re: I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 960 Views
I'm not a writer... - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 905 Views
Agree - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 847 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 917 Views
This logic is lacking as well - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 954 Views
Your comments make sense. - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 822 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 795 Views
Two Things - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 848 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 912 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 454 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 951 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 444 Views
What? Did you double post? - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 824 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 883 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 442 Views
I don't say it's impossible... - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 904 Views
This was done in the series before... - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 824 Views
I meant... - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 889 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 851 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 867 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 420 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 378 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 871 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 873 Views
there was a bit more before it - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 812 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 856 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 443 Views
Maybe I missed something. - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 839 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 408 Views

Reply to Message