Active Users:395 Time:02/05/2025 04:32:14 AM
Re: Your comments make sense. PatAtt Send a noteboard - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM
I approve. =) I still think my comments made more sense than you gave them credit, but I accept your argument as better logic than mine. Well done... I think we can safely lay Asmodean reincarnation/reappearance aside as a possibility.


Absolutely your comments made sense and I apologize if I implied otherwise. I just wanted to show that the math eliminated the possibility no matter how strong the Choeden Kal was because of the number of people. Actually, since many of us are new Brandon Sanderson readers, it is a good idea to parse his words because we DON'T know if he is one of those authors who likes to play Aes Sedai.
Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 1751 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 726 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 794 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 375 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 716 Views
It eliminates for the following - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 732 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 845 Views
Re: - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 800 Views
You make a faulty assumption - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 747 Views
NO! - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 633 Views
Why? - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 647 Views
Re: Why? - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 666 Views
Logical? - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 666 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 677 Views
I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 633 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 711 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 657 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 669 Views
Yes, but... - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 655 Views
That is still erroneous. - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 634 Views
your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 693 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 658 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 671 Views
I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 752 Views
Re: I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 707 Views
I'm not a writer... - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 711 Views
Agree - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 628 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 668 Views
This logic is lacking as well - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 710 Views
Your comments make sense. - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 572 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 569 Views
Two Things - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 623 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 679 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 348 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 702 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 333 Views
What? Did you double post? - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 602 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 652 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 327 Views
I don't say it's impossible... - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 664 Views
This was done in the series before... - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 592 Views
I meant... - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 681 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 629 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 636 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 303 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 284 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 645 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 636 Views
there was a bit more before it - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 586 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 618 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 328 Views
Maybe I missed something. - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 601 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 277 Views

Reply to Message