Active Users:665 Time:08/11/2026 11:45:52 AM
Re: Your comments make sense. PatAtt Send a noteboard - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM
I approve. =) I still think my comments made more sense than you gave them credit, but I accept your argument as better logic than mine. Well done... I think we can safely lay Asmodean reincarnation/reappearance aside as a possibility.


Absolutely your comments made sense and I apologize if I implied otherwise. I just wanted to show that the math eliminated the possibility no matter how strong the Choeden Kal was because of the number of people. Actually, since many of us are new Brandon Sanderson readers, it is a good idea to parse his words because we DON'T know if he is one of those authors who likes to play Aes Sedai.
Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 2124 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 1059 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 1103 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 567 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 1111 Views
It eliminates for the following - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 1106 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 1147 Views
Re: - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 1125 Views
You make a faulty assumption - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 1075 Views
NO! - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 976 Views
Why? - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 936 Views
Re: Why? - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 1003 Views
Logical? - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 980 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 980 Views
I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 948 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 1013 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 964 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 1023 Views
Yes, but... - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 984 Views
That is still erroneous. - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 963 Views
your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 1002 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 1012 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 1019 Views
I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 1101 Views
Re: I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 1084 Views
I'm not a writer... - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 1009 Views
Agree - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 968 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 1012 Views
This logic is lacking as well - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 1060 Views
Your comments make sense. - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 915 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 901 Views
Two Things - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 943 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 1005 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 507 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 1058 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 498 Views
What? Did you double post? - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 922 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 972 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 494 Views
I don't say it's impossible... - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 1001 Views
This was done in the series before... - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 925 Views
I meant... - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 975 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 954 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 971 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 480 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 426 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 982 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 963 Views
there was a bit more before it - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 902 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 948 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 494 Views
Maybe I missed something. - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 928 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 463 Views

Reply to Message