Active Users:410 Time:17/06/2025 07:37:25 PM
Re: Your comments make sense. PatAtt Send a noteboard - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM
I approve. =) I still think my comments made more sense than you gave them credit, but I accept your argument as better logic than mine. Well done... I think we can safely lay Asmodean reincarnation/reappearance aside as a possibility.


Absolutely your comments made sense and I apologize if I implied otherwise. I just wanted to show that the math eliminated the possibility no matter how strong the Choeden Kal was because of the number of people. Actually, since many of us are new Brandon Sanderson readers, it is a good idea to parse his words because we DON'T know if he is one of those authors who likes to play Aes Sedai.
Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 1780 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 737 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 813 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 379 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 742 Views
It eliminates for the following - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 742 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 859 Views
Re: - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 812 Views
You make a faulty assumption - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 757 Views
NO! - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 644 Views
Why? - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 661 Views
Re: Why? - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 681 Views
Logical? - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 681 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 688 Views
I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 644 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 726 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 673 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 683 Views
Yes, but... - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 673 Views
That is still erroneous. - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 647 Views
your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 706 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 674 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 685 Views
I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 764 Views
Re: I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 722 Views
I'm not a writer... - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 721 Views
Agree - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 641 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 681 Views
This logic is lacking as well - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 722 Views
Your comments make sense. - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 583 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 583 Views
Two Things - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 638 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 693 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 358 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 728 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 342 Views
What? Did you double post? - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 616 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 666 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 334 Views
I don't say it's impossible... - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 677 Views
This was done in the series before... - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 609 Views
I meant... - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 694 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 640 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 656 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 312 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 289 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 653 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 650 Views
there was a bit more before it - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 601 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 640 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 337 Views
Maybe I missed something. - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 613 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 284 Views

Reply to Message