Active Users:614 Time:31/10/2024 10:42:58 PM
He has stated that they will put the mystery to rest in the final books... ursidae Send a noteboard - 14/11/2009 04:02:53 PM
It is probably hard to do that if Graendal did it considering that she is now dead. (Not too likely that some other person than the murderer would think about Asmodean at this point.)

That being said, I read somewhere that Graendal may still be in the prologue of ToM, since the prologues usually takes place before the ending of the previous book.

If anything, the lack of shock indicates that Graendal is more likely. Of course, I still think it was Lanfear.

This message last edited by ursidae on 14/11/2009 at 04:03:58 PM
Reply to message
Another blow to the Graendaldunnit-theory - 14/11/2009 10:41:32 AM 1170 Views
I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. - 14/11/2009 02:53:25 PM 617 Views
He has stated that they will put the mystery to rest in the final books... - 14/11/2009 04:02:53 PM 723 Views
I actually figured a way that this could come up quite naturally without Graendal - 14/11/2009 04:11:24 PM 731 Views
RJ said it will probably revealed in the killer's PoV - 14/11/2009 04:46:20 PM 570 Views
And Brandon said Harriet gave him the freedom to tell the story as he wishes. - 14/11/2009 06:05:40 PM 539 Views
We (you, me & RJ) agree that it would be best to reveal it in the killer's PoV - 14/11/2009 06:40:33 PM 545 Views
Wait...wait...this is funny. - 20/11/2009 02:05:26 AM 457 Views
I often explained it, because many don't seem to get it - 20/11/2009 12:17:21 PM 412 Views
So maybe Graendal didn't care enough about Asmodean, either. - 20/11/2009 02:07:02 PM 441 Views
Neither Graendal nor Slayer mention killing Asmo... - 20/11/2009 02:46:40 PM 588 Views
I'm sure you can see... - 20/11/2009 03:25:41 PM 535 Views
Well... - 20/11/2009 05:23:28 PM 447 Views
It seems you think I don't read any posts and you certainly haven't read this board much. - 14/11/2009 04:30:06 PM 518 Views
That's wrong - 14/11/2009 04:45:02 PM 637 Views
Not one word of what I wrote is wrong. - 15/11/2009 01:41:18 AM 525 Views
right here - 15/11/2009 03:04:57 AM 506 Views
BS just said that Graendal will be mentioned, not appear as a character in ToM. *NM* - 15/11/2009 09:58:53 AM 221 Views
I never said "appear as a character." *NM* - 15/11/2009 12:14:16 PM 207 Views
- 15/11/2009 12:44:07 PM 605 Views
Re: I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. - 19/11/2009 12:07:25 AM 724 Views
Just once it would be nice to get a blow from Graendal. *NM* - 14/11/2009 03:50:41 PM 210 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 14/11/2009 04:46:33 PM 195 Views
Nope, that's not a blow against it at all - 14/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 447 Views
I don't agree with this interpretation at all - your grasping for straws... - 14/11/2009 07:34:58 PM 518 Views
Agreed *NM* - 15/11/2009 06:55:44 AM 205 Views
I disagree... - 15/11/2009 09:57:23 AM 552 Views
Only if you make the assumption that she was the most obvious to Sanderson. - 14/11/2009 07:37:39 PM 577 Views
Personally... - 15/11/2009 12:11:50 AM 567 Views
I think... - 15/11/2009 09:55:42 AM 448 Views
No. Try again. - 14/11/2009 11:35:59 PM 592 Views
Actually this is more against the Slayer theory - 15/11/2009 01:49:08 PM 509 Views
Nonsense... - 15/11/2009 02:06:04 PM 486 Views
Your tenacity is impressive. - 15/11/2009 03:14:50 PM 540 Views
Absolut statements in such discussions... - 15/11/2009 03:53:22 PM 469 Views
Re: Absolut statements in such discussions... - 15/11/2009 05:57:25 PM 423 Views
It's also possible that Lanfear gave Slayer the task. *NM* - 15/11/2009 07:55:17 PM 703 Views
Pa'ah did it. *NM* - 18/11/2009 01:02:09 AM 204 Views
It is not gone, I have a copy of it *NM* - 15/11/2009 06:19:11 PM 198 Views
I agree with Etzel. - 20/11/2009 02:59:44 AM 449 Views

Reply to Message