Q: "Were you surprised when you found out who killed Asmodean?"
A: "Brandon had been a fan for a long time before he got to find out who killed Asmodean. He said that he had heard arguments for every possible suspect, including the really crazy ones like Tam. So when he found out the real answer, he wasn’t shocked. His reaction was more 'Oh, those guys were right'. He said that the clues are there, but he never would have figured it out himself."
1) People have been arguing this for years and he said he knew all the arguments.
2) When he found out he wasn't shocked. I think we can assume that a few of the more popular and well argued assailants are viable while nothing crazy like Tam is it or else he would have been shocked. Probably the three most realistic theories are Lanfear, Graendal, and possibly Slayer.
3) His reaction was "Oh, those guys are right." I take that to mean that one of the more popular and feasible arguments IS correct.
4) He said that the clues are there, but he never would have figured it out himself. Robert Jordan has said for years that there are sufficient clues to figure it out. That is nothing new. And realistically him saying he would never have figured it out is doing nothing but affirming why none of us can figure it out 100% for sure either.
There is nothing revealing here about who DIDN'T do it. You're really grasping at straws. And please don't state that we can't have it revealed that Graendal did it because she is now apparently dead. There are plenty of literary devices that could be used to portray her as the killer from a non-Graendal perspective as well as from her perspective.
A: "Brandon had been a fan for a long time before he got to find out who killed Asmodean. He said that he had heard arguments for every possible suspect, including the really crazy ones like Tam. So when he found out the real answer, he wasn’t shocked. His reaction was more 'Oh, those guys were right'. He said that the clues are there, but he never would have figured it out himself."
1) People have been arguing this for years and he said he knew all the arguments.
2) When he found out he wasn't shocked. I think we can assume that a few of the more popular and well argued assailants are viable while nothing crazy like Tam is it or else he would have been shocked. Probably the three most realistic theories are Lanfear, Graendal, and possibly Slayer.
3) His reaction was "Oh, those guys are right." I take that to mean that one of the more popular and feasible arguments IS correct.
4) He said that the clues are there, but he never would have figured it out himself. Robert Jordan has said for years that there are sufficient clues to figure it out. That is nothing new. And realistically him saying he would never have figured it out is doing nothing but affirming why none of us can figure it out 100% for sure either.
There is nothing revealing here about who DIDN'T do it. You're really grasping at straws. And please don't state that we can't have it revealed that Graendal did it because she is now apparently dead. There are plenty of literary devices that could be used to portray her as the killer from a non-Graendal perspective as well as from her perspective.
But wine was the great assassin of both tradition and propriety...
-Brandon Sanderson, The Way of Kings
-Brandon Sanderson, The Way of Kings
Another blow to the Graendaldunnit-theory
- 14/11/2009 10:41:32 AM
1380 Views
I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that.
- 14/11/2009 02:53:25 PM
812 Views
He has stated that they will put the mystery to rest in the final books...
- 14/11/2009 04:02:53 PM
939 Views
I actually figured a way that this could come up quite naturally without Graendal
- 14/11/2009 04:11:24 PM
915 Views
RJ said it will probably revealed in the killer's PoV
- 14/11/2009 04:46:20 PM
758 Views
And Brandon said Harriet gave him the freedom to tell the story as he wishes.
- 14/11/2009 06:05:40 PM
723 Views
We (you, me & RJ) agree that it would be best to reveal it in the killer's PoV
- 14/11/2009 06:40:33 PM
748 Views
Wait...wait...this is funny.
- 20/11/2009 02:05:26 AM
640 Views
I often explained it, because many don't seem to get it
- 20/11/2009 12:17:21 PM
614 Views
So maybe Graendal didn't care enough about Asmodean, either.
- 20/11/2009 02:07:02 PM
653 Views
Neither Graendal nor Slayer mention killing Asmo...
- 20/11/2009 02:46:40 PM
781 Views
It seems you think I don't read any posts and you certainly haven't read this board much.
- 14/11/2009 04:30:06 PM
712 Views
That's wrong
- 14/11/2009 04:45:02 PM
821 Views
Not one word of what I wrote is wrong.
- 15/11/2009 01:41:18 AM
771 Views
right here
- 15/11/2009 03:04:57 AM
695 Views
If Graendal's name is mentioned, then "Graendal" is in the book. *NM*
- 15/11/2009 12:13:57 PM
318 Views
BS just said that Graendal will be mentioned, not appear as a character in ToM. *NM*
- 15/11/2009 09:58:53 AM
295 Views
BS never would have figured it out himself that Graendal did it? *NM*
- 14/11/2009 05:20:19 PM
296 Views
Re: I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that.
- 19/11/2009 12:07:25 AM
908 Views
I don't agree with this interpretation at all - your grasping for straws...
- 14/11/2009 07:34:58 PM
714 Views
Only if you make the assumption that she was the most obvious to Sanderson.
- 14/11/2009 07:37:39 PM
777 Views
No. Try again.
- 14/11/2009 11:35:59 PM
794 Views
Ok, I will stay alert for further blows to Graendaldunnit, if this didn't already convince you!
*NM*
- 15/11/2009 10:02:26 AM
282 Views
*NM*
- 15/11/2009 10:02:26 AM
282 Views
Actually this is more against the Slayer theory
- 15/11/2009 01:49:08 PM
707 Views
Nonsense...
- 15/11/2009 02:06:04 PM
658 Views
Your tenacity is impressive.
- 15/11/2009 03:14:50 PM
737 Views
- 15/11/2009 03:14:50 PM
737 Views
Absolut statements in such discussions...
- 15/11/2009 03:53:22 PM
645 Views
Re: Absolut statements in such discussions...
- 15/11/2009 05:57:25 PM
600 Views

