Active Users:477 Time:01/07/2025 03:49:25 AM
Personally... Legolas Send a noteboard - 15/11/2009 12:11:50 AM
I never really had much of an opinion on it, until just now when reading Leigh Butler's WoT reread, because reading a synopsis like that helps with seeing the bigger pictures in the plot and not just what happens from chapter to chapter. And the thing is, Rahvin had that plan with Graendal and Lanfear (and Sammael, sort of). When Rand came for him, they were to be there. They're the only two candidates who we know had a good reason to be there. And then as for choosing between the two, well, obviously Lanfear would make the most sense with regard to dramatic tension and the "You?! No!", but considering what happened earlier that day, Graendal seems more logical, as any theory involving Lanfear requires massive assumptions that have little support in the text to explain her getting back so fast; it's not impossible, but RJ's claims that the clues are all there would be a little strange then. If Cyndane ever gives us some more substantive insight into what happened to her, that should settle the debate once and for all either way, even if Asmodean is never mentioned.
Reply to message
Another blow to the Graendaldunnit-theory - 14/11/2009 10:41:32 AM 1278 Views
I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. - 14/11/2009 02:53:25 PM 726 Views
He has stated that they will put the mystery to rest in the final books... - 14/11/2009 04:02:53 PM 841 Views
I actually figured a way that this could come up quite naturally without Graendal - 14/11/2009 04:11:24 PM 830 Views
RJ said it will probably revealed in the killer's PoV - 14/11/2009 04:46:20 PM 682 Views
And Brandon said Harriet gave him the freedom to tell the story as he wishes. - 14/11/2009 06:05:40 PM 644 Views
We (you, me & RJ) agree that it would be best to reveal it in the killer's PoV - 14/11/2009 06:40:33 PM 653 Views
Wait...wait...this is funny. - 20/11/2009 02:05:26 AM 571 Views
I often explained it, because many don't seem to get it - 20/11/2009 12:17:21 PM 530 Views
So maybe Graendal didn't care enough about Asmodean, either. - 20/11/2009 02:07:02 PM 557 Views
Neither Graendal nor Slayer mention killing Asmo... - 20/11/2009 02:46:40 PM 696 Views
I'm sure you can see... - 20/11/2009 03:25:41 PM 710 Views
Well... - 20/11/2009 05:23:28 PM 556 Views
It seems you think I don't read any posts and you certainly haven't read this board much. - 14/11/2009 04:30:06 PM 625 Views
That's wrong - 14/11/2009 04:45:02 PM 740 Views
Not one word of what I wrote is wrong. - 15/11/2009 01:41:18 AM 701 Views
right here - 15/11/2009 03:04:57 AM 618 Views
BS just said that Graendal will be mentioned, not appear as a character in ToM. *NM* - 15/11/2009 09:58:53 AM 266 Views
I never said "appear as a character." *NM* - 15/11/2009 12:14:16 PM 247 Views
- 15/11/2009 12:44:07 PM 700 Views
Re: I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. - 19/11/2009 12:07:25 AM 831 Views
Just once it would be nice to get a blow from Graendal. *NM* - 14/11/2009 03:50:41 PM 248 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 14/11/2009 04:46:33 PM 238 Views
Nope, that's not a blow against it at all - 14/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 550 Views
I don't agree with this interpretation at all - your grasping for straws... - 14/11/2009 07:34:58 PM 628 Views
Agreed *NM* - 15/11/2009 06:55:44 AM 242 Views
I disagree... - 15/11/2009 09:57:23 AM 657 Views
Only if you make the assumption that she was the most obvious to Sanderson. - 14/11/2009 07:37:39 PM 689 Views
Personally... - 15/11/2009 12:11:50 AM 682 Views
I think... - 15/11/2009 09:55:42 AM 556 Views
No. Try again. - 14/11/2009 11:35:59 PM 699 Views
Actually this is more against the Slayer theory - 15/11/2009 01:49:08 PM 618 Views
Nonsense... - 15/11/2009 02:06:04 PM 588 Views
Your tenacity is impressive. - 15/11/2009 03:14:50 PM 645 Views
Absolut statements in such discussions... - 15/11/2009 03:53:22 PM 578 Views
Re: Absolut statements in such discussions... - 15/11/2009 05:57:25 PM 518 Views
It's also possible that Lanfear gave Slayer the task. *NM* - 15/11/2009 07:55:17 PM 806 Views
Pa'ah did it. *NM* - 18/11/2009 01:02:09 AM 252 Views
It is not gone, I have a copy of it *NM* - 15/11/2009 06:19:11 PM 242 Views
I agree with Etzel. - 20/11/2009 02:59:44 AM 564 Views

Reply to Message