I never really had much of an opinion on it, until just now when reading Leigh Butler's WoT reread, because reading a synopsis like that helps with seeing the bigger pictures in the plot and not just what happens from chapter to chapter. And the thing is, Rahvin had that plan with Graendal and Lanfear (and Sammael, sort of). When Rand came for him, they were to be there. They're the only two candidates who we know had a good reason to be there. And then as for choosing between the two, well, obviously Lanfear would make the most sense with regard to dramatic tension and the "You?! No!", but considering what happened earlier that day, Graendal seems more logical, as any theory involving Lanfear requires massive assumptions that have little support in the text to explain her getting back so fast; it's not impossible, but RJ's claims that the clues are all there would be a little strange then. If Cyndane ever gives us some more substantive insight into what happened to her, that should settle the debate once and for all either way, even if Asmodean is never mentioned.
Another blow to the Graendaldunnit-theory
- 14/11/2009 10:41:32 AM
1377 Views
I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that.
- 14/11/2009 02:53:25 PM
809 Views
He has stated that they will put the mystery to rest in the final books...
- 14/11/2009 04:02:53 PM
936 Views
I actually figured a way that this could come up quite naturally without Graendal
- 14/11/2009 04:11:24 PM
914 Views
RJ said it will probably revealed in the killer's PoV
- 14/11/2009 04:46:20 PM
758 Views
And Brandon said Harriet gave him the freedom to tell the story as he wishes.
- 14/11/2009 06:05:40 PM
720 Views
We (you, me & RJ) agree that it would be best to reveal it in the killer's PoV
- 14/11/2009 06:40:33 PM
747 Views
Wait...wait...this is funny.
- 20/11/2009 02:05:26 AM
637 Views
I often explained it, because many don't seem to get it
- 20/11/2009 12:17:21 PM
611 Views
So maybe Graendal didn't care enough about Asmodean, either.
- 20/11/2009 02:07:02 PM
650 Views
Neither Graendal nor Slayer mention killing Asmo...
- 20/11/2009 02:46:40 PM
778 Views
It seems you think I don't read any posts and you certainly haven't read this board much.
- 14/11/2009 04:30:06 PM
709 Views
That's wrong
- 14/11/2009 04:45:02 PM
818 Views
Not one word of what I wrote is wrong.
- 15/11/2009 01:41:18 AM
770 Views
right here
- 15/11/2009 03:04:57 AM
694 Views
If Graendal's name is mentioned, then "Graendal" is in the book. *NM*
- 15/11/2009 12:13:57 PM
317 Views
BS just said that Graendal will be mentioned, not appear as a character in ToM. *NM*
- 15/11/2009 09:58:53 AM
294 Views
BS never would have figured it out himself that Graendal did it? *NM*
- 14/11/2009 05:20:19 PM
295 Views
Re: I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that.
- 19/11/2009 12:07:25 AM
907 Views
I don't agree with this interpretation at all - your grasping for straws...
- 14/11/2009 07:34:58 PM
711 Views
Only if you make the assumption that she was the most obvious to Sanderson.
- 14/11/2009 07:37:39 PM
774 Views
Personally...
- 15/11/2009 12:11:50 AM
769 Views
No. Try again.
- 14/11/2009 11:35:59 PM
791 Views
Ok, I will stay alert for further blows to Graendaldunnit, if this didn't already convince you!
*NM*
- 15/11/2009 10:02:26 AM
281 Views
*NM*
- 15/11/2009 10:02:26 AM
281 Views
Actually this is more against the Slayer theory
- 15/11/2009 01:49:08 PM
704 Views
Nonsense...
- 15/11/2009 02:06:04 PM
655 Views
Your tenacity is impressive.
- 15/11/2009 03:14:50 PM
734 Views
- 15/11/2009 03:14:50 PM
734 Views
Absolut statements in such discussions...
- 15/11/2009 03:53:22 PM
643 Views
Re: Absolut statements in such discussions...
- 15/11/2009 05:57:25 PM
597 Views

