Active Users:1476 Time:02/10/2026 09:19:15 PM
Personally... Legolas Send a noteboard - 15/11/2009 12:11:50 AM
I never really had much of an opinion on it, until just now when reading Leigh Butler's WoT reread, because reading a synopsis like that helps with seeing the bigger pictures in the plot and not just what happens from chapter to chapter. And the thing is, Rahvin had that plan with Graendal and Lanfear (and Sammael, sort of). When Rand came for him, they were to be there. They're the only two candidates who we know had a good reason to be there. And then as for choosing between the two, well, obviously Lanfear would make the most sense with regard to dramatic tension and the "You?! No!", but considering what happened earlier that day, Graendal seems more logical, as any theory involving Lanfear requires massive assumptions that have little support in the text to explain her getting back so fast; it's not impossible, but RJ's claims that the clues are all there would be a little strange then. If Cyndane ever gives us some more substantive insight into what happened to her, that should settle the debate once and for all either way, even if Asmodean is never mentioned.
Reply to message
Another blow to the Graendaldunnit-theory - 14/11/2009 10:41:32 AM 1573 Views
I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. - 14/11/2009 02:53:25 PM 1007 Views
He has stated that they will put the mystery to rest in the final books... - 14/11/2009 04:02:53 PM 1148 Views
I actually figured a way that this could come up quite naturally without Graendal - 14/11/2009 04:11:24 PM 1101 Views
RJ said it will probably revealed in the killer's PoV - 14/11/2009 04:46:20 PM 949 Views
And Brandon said Harriet gave him the freedom to tell the story as he wishes. - 14/11/2009 06:05:40 PM 895 Views
We (you, me & RJ) agree that it would be best to reveal it in the killer's PoV - 14/11/2009 06:40:33 PM 947 Views
Wait...wait...this is funny. - 20/11/2009 02:05:26 AM 814 Views
I often explained it, because many don't seem to get it - 20/11/2009 12:17:21 PM 801 Views
So maybe Graendal didn't care enough about Asmodean, either. - 20/11/2009 02:07:02 PM 849 Views
Neither Graendal nor Slayer mention killing Asmo... - 20/11/2009 02:46:40 PM 989 Views
I'm sure you can see... - 20/11/2009 03:25:41 PM 986 Views
Well... - 20/11/2009 05:23:28 PM 819 Views
It seems you think I don't read any posts and you certainly haven't read this board much. - 14/11/2009 04:30:06 PM 905 Views
That's wrong - 14/11/2009 04:45:02 PM 1031 Views
Not one word of what I wrote is wrong. - 15/11/2009 01:41:18 AM 954 Views
right here - 15/11/2009 03:04:57 AM 872 Views
BS just said that Graendal will be mentioned, not appear as a character in ToM. *NM* - 15/11/2009 09:58:53 AM 390 Views
I never said "appear as a character." *NM* - 15/11/2009 12:14:16 PM 381 Views
- 15/11/2009 12:44:07 PM 965 Views
Re: I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. - 19/11/2009 12:07:25 AM 1117 Views
Just once it would be nice to get a blow from Graendal. *NM* - 14/11/2009 03:50:41 PM 356 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 14/11/2009 04:46:33 PM 367 Views
Nope, that's not a blow against it at all - 14/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 788 Views
I don't agree with this interpretation at all - your grasping for straws... - 14/11/2009 07:34:58 PM 918 Views
Agreed *NM* - 15/11/2009 06:55:44 AM 364 Views
I disagree... - 15/11/2009 09:57:23 AM 897 Views
Only if you make the assumption that she was the most obvious to Sanderson. - 14/11/2009 07:37:39 PM 974 Views
Personally... - 15/11/2009 12:11:50 AM 985 Views
I think... - 15/11/2009 09:55:42 AM 835 Views
No. Try again. - 14/11/2009 11:35:59 PM 986 Views
Actually this is more against the Slayer theory - 15/11/2009 01:49:08 PM 898 Views
Nonsense... - 15/11/2009 02:06:04 PM 863 Views
Your tenacity is impressive. - 15/11/2009 03:14:50 PM 910 Views
Absolut statements in such discussions... - 15/11/2009 03:53:22 PM 829 Views
Re: Absolut statements in such discussions... - 15/11/2009 05:57:25 PM 790 Views
It's also possible that Lanfear gave Slayer the task. *NM* - 15/11/2009 07:55:17 PM 1072 Views
Pa'ah did it. *NM* - 18/11/2009 01:02:09 AM 389 Views
It is not gone, I have a copy of it *NM* - 15/11/2009 06:19:11 PM 361 Views
I agree with Etzel. - 20/11/2009 02:59:44 AM 833 Views

Reply to Message