Active Users:1605 Time:17/12/2025 05:21:23 AM
I think... Etzel Send a noteboard - 15/11/2009 09:55:42 AM
While the theory that Graendal did it actually has big question marks, anyone with half a brain can come up with it. People basically just (wrongly) assume that a Forsaken must have killed Asmo, that most Forsaken are ruled out and that Graendal knows that Asmo is dead (the latter two clues come from LoC and the following books, though, contrary to RJ's words that the clues can be found before LoC).
Reply to message
Another blow to the Graendaldunnit-theory - 14/11/2009 10:41:32 AM 1385 Views
I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. - 14/11/2009 02:53:25 PM 822 Views
He has stated that they will put the mystery to rest in the final books... - 14/11/2009 04:02:53 PM 941 Views
I actually figured a way that this could come up quite naturally without Graendal - 14/11/2009 04:11:24 PM 923 Views
RJ said it will probably revealed in the killer's PoV - 14/11/2009 04:46:20 PM 764 Views
And Brandon said Harriet gave him the freedom to tell the story as he wishes. - 14/11/2009 06:05:40 PM 726 Views
We (you, me & RJ) agree that it would be best to reveal it in the killer's PoV - 14/11/2009 06:40:33 PM 756 Views
Wait...wait...this is funny. - 20/11/2009 02:05:26 AM 643 Views
I often explained it, because many don't seem to get it - 20/11/2009 12:17:21 PM 616 Views
So maybe Graendal didn't care enough about Asmodean, either. - 20/11/2009 02:07:02 PM 659 Views
Neither Graendal nor Slayer mention killing Asmo... - 20/11/2009 02:46:40 PM 786 Views
I'm sure you can see... - 20/11/2009 03:25:41 PM 793 Views
Well... - 20/11/2009 05:23:28 PM 631 Views
It seems you think I don't read any posts and you certainly haven't read this board much. - 14/11/2009 04:30:06 PM 720 Views
That's wrong - 14/11/2009 04:45:02 PM 825 Views
Not one word of what I wrote is wrong. - 15/11/2009 01:41:18 AM 773 Views
right here - 15/11/2009 03:04:57 AM 700 Views
BS just said that Graendal will be mentioned, not appear as a character in ToM. *NM* - 15/11/2009 09:58:53 AM 297 Views
I never said "appear as a character." *NM* - 15/11/2009 12:14:16 PM 293 Views
- 15/11/2009 12:44:07 PM 773 Views
Re: I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. - 19/11/2009 12:07:25 AM 919 Views
Just once it would be nice to get a blow from Graendal. *NM* - 14/11/2009 03:50:41 PM 274 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 14/11/2009 04:46:33 PM 287 Views
Nope, that's not a blow against it at all - 14/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 625 Views
I don't agree with this interpretation at all - your grasping for straws... - 14/11/2009 07:34:58 PM 717 Views
Agreed *NM* - 15/11/2009 06:55:44 AM 281 Views
I disagree... - 15/11/2009 09:57:23 AM 727 Views
Only if you make the assumption that she was the most obvious to Sanderson. - 14/11/2009 07:37:39 PM 781 Views
Personally... - 15/11/2009 12:11:50 AM 772 Views
I think... - 15/11/2009 09:55:42 AM 652 Views
No. Try again. - 14/11/2009 11:35:59 PM 798 Views
Actually this is more against the Slayer theory - 15/11/2009 01:49:08 PM 711 Views
Nonsense... - 15/11/2009 02:06:04 PM 664 Views
Your tenacity is impressive. - 15/11/2009 03:14:50 PM 741 Views
Absolut statements in such discussions... - 15/11/2009 03:53:22 PM 649 Views
Re: Absolut statements in such discussions... - 15/11/2009 05:57:25 PM 604 Views
It's also possible that Lanfear gave Slayer the task. *NM* - 15/11/2009 07:55:17 PM 892 Views
Pa'ah did it. *NM* - 18/11/2009 01:02:09 AM 304 Views
It is not gone, I have a copy of it *NM* - 15/11/2009 06:19:11 PM 282 Views
I agree with Etzel. - 20/11/2009 02:59:44 AM 644 Views

Reply to Message