Active Users:620 Time:06/05/2026 11:55:28 PM
I disagree... Etzel Send a noteboard - 15/11/2009 09:57:23 AM
This lends no weight to any of the 'major' suspects in my opinion. Only that minor suspects are less likely (and frankly, I consider Slayer a minor suspect, so if anything it takes away from that theory)


The answer it clear that the killer certainly wasn't the most popular choice, Graendal.

But of course you still have the opportunity to ask BS, whom he suspected as killer, when he was just a random WoT fan.. ;)
Reply to message
Another blow to the Graendaldunnit-theory - 14/11/2009 10:41:32 AM 1481 Views
I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. - 14/11/2009 02:53:25 PM 899 Views
He has stated that they will put the mystery to rest in the final books... - 14/11/2009 04:02:53 PM 1044 Views
I actually figured a way that this could come up quite naturally without Graendal - 14/11/2009 04:11:24 PM 999 Views
RJ said it will probably revealed in the killer's PoV - 14/11/2009 04:46:20 PM 846 Views
And Brandon said Harriet gave him the freedom to tell the story as he wishes. - 14/11/2009 06:05:40 PM 799 Views
We (you, me & RJ) agree that it would be best to reveal it in the killer's PoV - 14/11/2009 06:40:33 PM 836 Views
Wait...wait...this is funny. - 20/11/2009 02:05:26 AM 715 Views
I often explained it, because many don't seem to get it - 20/11/2009 12:17:21 PM 699 Views
So maybe Graendal didn't care enough about Asmodean, either. - 20/11/2009 02:07:02 PM 730 Views
Neither Graendal nor Slayer mention killing Asmo... - 20/11/2009 02:46:40 PM 862 Views
I'm sure you can see... - 20/11/2009 03:25:41 PM 876 Views
Well... - 20/11/2009 05:23:28 PM 723 Views
It seems you think I don't read any posts and you certainly haven't read this board much. - 14/11/2009 04:30:06 PM 790 Views
That's wrong - 14/11/2009 04:45:02 PM 907 Views
Not one word of what I wrote is wrong. - 15/11/2009 01:41:18 AM 852 Views
right here - 15/11/2009 03:04:57 AM 774 Views
BS just said that Graendal will be mentioned, not appear as a character in ToM. *NM* - 15/11/2009 09:58:53 AM 327 Views
I never said "appear as a character." *NM* - 15/11/2009 12:14:16 PM 328 Views
- 15/11/2009 12:44:07 PM 848 Views
Re: I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. - 19/11/2009 12:07:25 AM 1015 Views
Just once it would be nice to get a blow from Graendal. *NM* - 14/11/2009 03:50:41 PM 310 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 14/11/2009 04:46:33 PM 315 Views
Nope, that's not a blow against it at all - 14/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 700 Views
I don't agree with this interpretation at all - your grasping for straws... - 14/11/2009 07:34:58 PM 804 Views
Agreed *NM* - 15/11/2009 06:55:44 AM 308 Views
I disagree... - 15/11/2009 09:57:23 AM 795 Views
Only if you make the assumption that she was the most obvious to Sanderson. - 14/11/2009 07:37:39 PM 862 Views
Personally... - 15/11/2009 12:11:50 AM 862 Views
I think... - 15/11/2009 09:55:42 AM 720 Views
No. Try again. - 14/11/2009 11:35:59 PM 881 Views
Actually this is more against the Slayer theory - 15/11/2009 01:49:08 PM 779 Views
Nonsense... - 15/11/2009 02:06:04 PM 756 Views
Your tenacity is impressive. - 15/11/2009 03:14:50 PM 817 Views
Absolut statements in such discussions... - 15/11/2009 03:53:22 PM 730 Views
Re: Absolut statements in such discussions... - 15/11/2009 05:57:25 PM 682 Views
It's also possible that Lanfear gave Slayer the task. *NM* - 15/11/2009 07:55:17 PM 973 Views
Pa'ah did it. *NM* - 18/11/2009 01:02:09 AM 337 Views
It is not gone, I have a copy of it *NM* - 15/11/2009 06:19:11 PM 312 Views
I agree with Etzel. - 20/11/2009 02:59:44 AM 724 Views

Reply to Message