Active Users:877 Time:23/01/2026 12:45:18 AM
I disagree... Etzel Send a noteboard - 15/11/2009 09:57:23 AM
This lends no weight to any of the 'major' suspects in my opinion. Only that minor suspects are less likely (and frankly, I consider Slayer a minor suspect, so if anything it takes away from that theory)


The answer it clear that the killer certainly wasn't the most popular choice, Graendal.

But of course you still have the opportunity to ask BS, whom he suspected as killer, when he was just a random WoT fan.. ;)
Reply to message
Another blow to the Graendaldunnit-theory - 14/11/2009 10:41:32 AM 1412 Views
I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. - 14/11/2009 02:53:25 PM 841 Views
He has stated that they will put the mystery to rest in the final books... - 14/11/2009 04:02:53 PM 966 Views
I actually figured a way that this could come up quite naturally without Graendal - 14/11/2009 04:11:24 PM 944 Views
RJ said it will probably revealed in the killer's PoV - 14/11/2009 04:46:20 PM 787 Views
And Brandon said Harriet gave him the freedom to tell the story as he wishes. - 14/11/2009 06:05:40 PM 743 Views
We (you, me & RJ) agree that it would be best to reveal it in the killer's PoV - 14/11/2009 06:40:33 PM 776 Views
Wait...wait...this is funny. - 20/11/2009 02:05:26 AM 660 Views
I often explained it, because many don't seem to get it - 20/11/2009 12:17:21 PM 639 Views
So maybe Graendal didn't care enough about Asmodean, either. - 20/11/2009 02:07:02 PM 679 Views
Neither Graendal nor Slayer mention killing Asmo... - 20/11/2009 02:46:40 PM 804 Views
I'm sure you can see... - 20/11/2009 03:25:41 PM 814 Views
Well... - 20/11/2009 05:23:28 PM 657 Views
It seems you think I don't read any posts and you certainly haven't read this board much. - 14/11/2009 04:30:06 PM 734 Views
That's wrong - 14/11/2009 04:45:02 PM 846 Views
Not one word of what I wrote is wrong. - 15/11/2009 01:41:18 AM 796 Views
right here - 15/11/2009 03:04:57 AM 720 Views
BS just said that Graendal will be mentioned, not appear as a character in ToM. *NM* - 15/11/2009 09:58:53 AM 304 Views
I never said "appear as a character." *NM* - 15/11/2009 12:14:16 PM 302 Views
- 15/11/2009 12:44:07 PM 794 Views
Re: I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. - 19/11/2009 12:07:25 AM 943 Views
Just once it would be nice to get a blow from Graendal. *NM* - 14/11/2009 03:50:41 PM 285 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 14/11/2009 04:46:33 PM 294 Views
Nope, that's not a blow against it at all - 14/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 642 Views
I don't agree with this interpretation at all - your grasping for straws... - 14/11/2009 07:34:58 PM 740 Views
Agreed *NM* - 15/11/2009 06:55:44 AM 286 Views
I disagree... - 15/11/2009 09:57:23 AM 750 Views
Only if you make the assumption that she was the most obvious to Sanderson. - 14/11/2009 07:37:39 PM 802 Views
Personally... - 15/11/2009 12:11:50 AM 802 Views
I think... - 15/11/2009 09:55:42 AM 672 Views
No. Try again. - 14/11/2009 11:35:59 PM 821 Views
Actually this is more against the Slayer theory - 15/11/2009 01:49:08 PM 726 Views
Nonsense... - 15/11/2009 02:06:04 PM 689 Views
Your tenacity is impressive. - 15/11/2009 03:14:50 PM 768 Views
Absolut statements in such discussions... - 15/11/2009 03:53:22 PM 674 Views
Re: Absolut statements in such discussions... - 15/11/2009 05:57:25 PM 621 Views
It's also possible that Lanfear gave Slayer the task. *NM* - 15/11/2009 07:55:17 PM 915 Views
Pa'ah did it. *NM* - 18/11/2009 01:02:09 AM 314 Views
It is not gone, I have a copy of it *NM* - 15/11/2009 06:19:11 PM 292 Views
I agree with Etzel. - 20/11/2009 02:59:44 AM 664 Views

Reply to Message